Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-11, 03:33 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,806
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

I was watching Parenthood last night. Steve Martin had a flashback in which he 'failed' his son for making him play second base and at his graduation, his son was shooting up the school with a sniper rifle from a clock tower. My first thought was..."they could never get away with a scene like this now".

So what other scenes from older movies would (general) audiences these days be too sensitive to?
Old 09-15-11, 03:56 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: IN
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Most movies from the 80's that were marketed towards a younger viewer have material that would not be allowed in todays 'kids' movies.

The language in 'Bad News Bears' comes to mind.

The film 'Pretty Baby' would probably not even be made today and if it were it certainly would be MUCH tamer or have an older girl playing a younger one.

Several scenes in films that show a terrorist in a comedic situation. (although I think it's moronic to take that out simply because of peoples fears)

just a few that came to mind.
Old 09-15-11, 03:57 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Legend
 
bluetoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,710
Received 274 Likes on 206 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Wait doesn't that last part in the OP happen in If... as well? If so, that may be a candidate.
Old 09-15-11, 04:00 PM
  #4  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

I haven't paid much attention to television lately, but after Sept. 11 i did wonder whether James Bond The Living Daylights would ever be shown on tv again. Has it ?
Old 09-15-11, 04:00 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: IN
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Yeah actually just watched 'If....' and I actually said to my wife "there is no way in hell they could make this today". Certainly a good choice.
Old 09-15-11, 04:07 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Posts: 20,052
Received 168 Likes on 126 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

The scene in Parenthood would still be in a movie today. The scene is referencing the Charles Whitman shooting in Austin, TX that took place in 1966. That tragic event didn't stop them from putting it in Parenthood to begin with, why would Columbine or Virginia Tech stop someone today?

In regards to "...If" what makes you think they wouldn't make a film with a scene like that today? "...If" was a controversial film in its day. That scene would not have been put in a mainstream, studio, big budget film back then. It was so controversial in it's time that it got an X rating in England I believe. But they can and would make a film with a scene like that today...and they'd probably only get an R
Old 09-15-11, 04:08 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
islandclaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,085
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

All of Freaks?
Old 09-15-11, 04:21 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: IN
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Originally Posted by Mabuse
The scene in Parenthood would still be in a movie today. The scene is referencing the Charles Whitman shooting in Austin, TX that took place in 1966. That tragic event didn't stop them from putting it in Parenthood to begin with, why would Columbine or Virginia Tech stop someone today?

In regards to "...If" what makes you think they wouldn't make a film with a scene like that today? "...If" was a controversial film in its day. That scene would not have been put in a mainstream, studio, big budget film back then. It was so controversial in it's time that it got an X rating in England I believe. But they can and would make a film with a scene like that today...and they'd probably only get an R
I don't quite agree.

If....'s end scene was done with a kind of giddy zeal, slightly downplaying the horrific nature of the actual event and instead presenting it as a heroic action to a degree.

I do feel the end scene could, in fact, be made today but they would need to 'send a different message'. Of course, independent cinema has many films that stretch bounds (to some people) but in today's day and age, I doubt they would get much backing with the kind of message 'If....' may send to some people.

Simply showing them doing what they do at the end isn't quite the only issue, it's how the film presents it.
Old 09-15-11, 04:43 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Matthew Chmiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 13,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

A school shooting can be done in a motion picture post-Columbine. Yes, the film is inspired by the events of that day, but the last ten minutes of Elephant show all the graphic details of what a school shooting looks like.

I don't think there's material that would not be allowed by a studio today. I just don't think it would pass by with its current rating under the MPAA.

The Bad News Bears has language that can't even be said in a PG-13 film today (and you all know which specific scene I'm referring to). The language, sexual and drug content all involving young teenagers in Over the Edge wouldn't get a PG, let alone a PG-13, in today's society. Jaws? It would easily get a hard PG-13, if not an R.

It's interesting that on the flip side, a lot of films that had to be edited down to an R (from an NC-17 or X rating) years ago would probably secure an R rating in its original, uncut state if released now. Thanks Lionsgate and the Weinsteins.
Old 09-15-11, 04:46 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Posts: 20,052
Received 168 Likes on 126 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

I will conceed that the kind of "revolutionary" zeal of the scene in "If..." would probably be absent from any Hollywood version of the movie. Hollywood doesn't do revolutionary. But an indie film would and could make a scene like that today.

Here's a great example of something I don't think you'd see today: A performance like John Mills in Ryan's Daughter. He plays a villiage idiot character that is so broad and over the top (yet I think he won an Oscar) that it would be deemed offensive to retarded people today.

Same thing with Mickey Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffany's. A film can have ethnic humor today, but not something this broad and stereotyped.

Also, scenes with animals being used roughly. Disney's 20,000 Leagues and Swiss Family Robinson both use animals in ways that would not be permited in an American film today.
Old 09-15-11, 05:22 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,190
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Originally Posted by Mabuse
The scene in Parenthood would still be in a movie today. The scene is referencing the Charles Whitman shooting in Austin, TX that took place in 1966. That tragic event didn't stop them from putting it in Parenthood to begin with, why would Columbine or Virginia Tech stop someone today?

In regards to "...If" what makes you think they wouldn't make a film with a scene like that today? "...If" was a controversial film in its day. That scene would not have been put in a mainstream, studio, big budget film back then. It was so controversial in it's time that it got an X rating in England I believe. But they can and would make a film with a scene like that today...and they'd probably only get an R
Originally Posted by Matthew Chmiel
A school shooting can be done in a motion picture post-Columbine. Yes, the film is inspired by the events of that day, but the last ten minutes of Elephant show all the graphic details of what a school shooting looks like.

I don't think there's material that would not be allowed by a studio today. I just don't think it would pass by with its current rating under the MPAA.

The Bad News Bears has language that can't even be said in a PG-13 film today (and you all know which specific scene I'm referring to). The language, sexual and drug content all involving young teenagers in Over the Edge wouldn't get a PG, let alone a PG-13, in today's society. Jaws? It would easily get a hard PG-13, if not an R.

It's interesting that on the flip side, a lot of films that had to be edited down to an R (from an NC-17 or X rating) years ago would probably secure an R rating in its original, uncut state if released now. Thanks Lionsgate and the Weinsteins.
I agree the Parenthood scene would still be in the movie if it had been made today.

School shootings have still happened in films and TV shows post Columbine.Elephant is a good example.

One thing that I found to be really ridiculous was an omitted scene from the 2001 movie Sugar and Spice. The original script called for a woman to kill her husband after giving birth because he had sex with a nurse in the hospital. The studio and the producers decided to take that scene out of the movie and their excuse was the "Columbine shooting." That issue lead to falling out between the screenwriter and producers.
Old 09-15-11, 05:32 PM
  #12  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,630
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Originally Posted by Mabuse
I will conceed that the kind of "revolutionary" zeal of the scene in "If..." would probably be absent from any Hollywood version of the movie. Hollywood doesn't do revolutionary. But an indie film would and could make a scene like that today.

Here's a great example of something I don't think you'd see today: A performance like John Mills in Ryan's Daughter. He plays a villiage idiot character that is so broad and over the top (yet I think he won an Oscar) that it would be deemed offensive to retarded people today.

Same thing with Mickey Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffany's. A film can have ethnic humor today, but not something this broad and stereotyped.

Also, scenes with animals being used roughly. Disney's 20,000 Leagues and Swiss Family Robinson both use animals in ways that would not be permited in an American film today.
the frog hat scene in Bertolucci's 1900 wouldn't cut the muster either.
Old 09-15-11, 06:12 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 43,392
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,032 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

I'd say a fair amount of Blazing Saddles wouldn't make the cut today.
Old 09-15-11, 06:41 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

The entire movie Batman Returns is ridiculously dark and violent, no way would they let that in now.
Old 09-15-11, 06:42 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Pizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,136
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Originally Posted by Draven
I'd say a fair amount of Blazing Saddles wouldn't make the cut today.
I was going to say the same thing.
Old 09-15-11, 07:00 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Legend
 
JumpCutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: south of heaven
Posts: 13,540
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

The crucifix masturbation scene in The Exorcist. At least the way it's filmed and edited would be much different today. But more than likely excised completely. Also the opening dialogue by the demon when Father Merrin enters Reagan's the room for the first time.
Old 09-15-11, 07:06 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
davidh777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Home of 2013 NFL champion Seahawks
Posts: 52,625
Received 1,016 Likes on 840 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Al Jolson in blackface. The first time I saw Swing Time on network TV, they cut the Fred Astaire blackface scene.

Yeah, Robert Downey Jr....
Old 09-15-11, 07:14 PM
  #18  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Sub-basement 3b
Posts: 3,754
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Donald Sutherland and Julie Christie in "Don't Look Now"...you know the part...
Old 09-15-11, 07:20 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Posts: 18,295
Received 372 Likes on 266 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Originally Posted by CloverClover
The entire movie Batman Returns is ridiculously dark and violent, no way would they let that in now.
Did you see the Dark Knight? I don't think Returns would have any problems today.
Old 09-15-11, 07:23 PM
  #20  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
inri222's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 50,673
Received 182 Likes on 120 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

1900

The scene with Donald Sutherland and the little boy.
The threesome scene.
And a couple of others.......
Old 09-15-11, 07:25 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: IN
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

1900

The scene with Donald Sutherland and the Little boy.
The threesome scene.
And a couple of others.......


oh weird man!
Old 09-15-11, 07:27 PM
  #22  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
DarthVong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under your bed
Posts: 5,778
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now





Old 09-15-11, 08:17 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 7,436
Received 90 Likes on 70 Posts
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Originally Posted by Draven
I'd say a fair amount of Blazing Saddles wouldn't make the cut today.
First movie that came to mind.
Old 09-15-11, 09:39 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,622
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

Originally Posted by foofighters7
Several scenes in films that show a terrorist in a comedic situation. (although I think it's moronic to take that out simply because of peoples fears)
I highly recommend that you watch Four Lions. It's hilarious.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGk2TojOd-4
Old 09-15-11, 09:47 PM
  #25  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: IN
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Scenes in older movies that would never be 'allowed' by studios now

looks pretty good, i'll check it out. I had heard of it before but never looked into it.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.