![]() |
Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Yea I have done a few of these before, but onto 1992 best supporting actor. Who do you think was the best out of the nominees?
Jaye Davidson- The Crying Game Gene Hackman- Unforgiven (winner) Jack Nicholson- A Few Good Men Al Pacino- Glengarry Glen Ross David Paymer- Mr Saturday Night I think the academy got it right. I hear a lot of people say Jaye Davidson deserved to win, but I think hes overrated in The Crying Game. It seemed like a performance that may have looked like it deserved to win at the time but I dont think it holds up well. I think he took a nomination that should have gone to Jack Lemmon in Glengarry Glen Ross |
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Those are some great actors up there, but Gene Hackman is the fucking man. Totally deserved it.
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Hard to argue w/ Jack's performance, although I was happy w/ how it ended up.
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Al Pacino
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Love Jack and his performance is seriously iconic (compated to Hackman), but I've got to go with Hackman. Amazing performance in a great film.
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by conscience
(Post 10748581)
Love Jack and his performance is seriously iconic (compated to Hackman), but I've got to go with Hackman. Amazing performance in a great film.
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Pacino was great in Glengarry but... over Baldwin? Ridiculous ;)
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Jack Lemmon was robbed of a nomination for the same film. Not sure what category I would put him in though
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by Unforgiven1998
(Post 10748587)
Do you think its the speech that is more iconic than his performance? I mean Jack was brilliant, but I always felt that the speech was more iconic as oppossed to the character
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by Unforgiven1998
(Post 10748657)
Jack Lemmon was robbed of a nomination for the same film. Not sure what category I would put him in though
I mean, he wasn't screaming his way through the part like Pacino in "Scent of a Woman", but we can't have it all. Where would we put it? |
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 10748809)
He was the best of an already amazing lot of actors in that film. :up: I'd say Best Actor, easy. When he was on the phone with a lead, pretending to be talking to his bullshit secretary, equally parts snake-oil salesman and desparation... perfection.
I mean, he wasn't screaming his way through the part like Pacino in "Scent of a Woman", but we can't have it all. Where would we put it? |
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
I object to the poll because it includes full movie titles instead of first initials only
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Hackman was terrific and deserved it out of that group.
Pacino was Pacino, completely over the top and a near-parody of what he used to be. Although I do enjoy his filthy rant at Kevin Spacey. Jaye Davidson was good only because he played a convinving woman. I already knew the surprise before seeing it, but my wife didn't and she was like WTF! Nicholson was one-note, but he did it well. Never saw Mr Saturday Night. |
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
I never saw Mr. Saturday Night either but Paymer is a wonderful actor so I suspect that his performance was worthy of the nomination.
Of the remaining four...yeah, Hackman. I think Charlie Goose pretty much nailed the reasons why. Nicholson chewed a lot of scenery but it wasn't really an Oscar-worthy performance. I would actually even go so far as to say that it wasn't even worthy of a nomination. But then, I have always felt that Nicholson was actually miscast for that role anyway. |
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by Charlie Goose
(Post 10749638)
Pacino was Pacino, completely over the top and a near-parody of what he used to be. Although I do enjoy his filthy rant at Kevin Spacey.
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
(Post 10748547)
Those are some great actors up there, but Gene Hackman is the fucking man. Totally deserved it.
It wasn't really much to it. Now Jack N. you never seen him act like that. He's always plays a fun guy. I voted for Jack. Al did his shouting bit and I'm sick of it. |
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by wm lopez
(Post 10750807)
Gene has given that performance before like in QUICK & DEAD.
It wasn't really much to it. Now Jack N. you never seen him act like that. He's always plays a fun guy. I voted for Jack. Al did his shouting bit and I'm sick of it. Eh, forget it. |
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by wm lopez
(Post 10750807)
Gene has given that performance before like in QUICK & DEAD.
It wasn't really much to it. Now Jack N. you never seen him act like that. He's always plays a fun guy. I voted for Jack. Al did his shouting bit and I'm sick of it. |
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by MoviePage
(Post 10750911)
:hscratch: Are you really for real?
Eh, forget it. |
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
I think Duvall may have been better in the Nicholson role in A Few Good Men
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by Unforgiven1998
(Post 10750912)
Hackman did Unforgiven before he did The Quick and the Dead
I ment to say he's given that bad guy performance before just like Jack's given that OFOTCN performance many times and that's how we know Jack. So his FEW GOOD MEN performance stands out. |
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Gene Hackman for sure!
|
Re: Best Supporting Actor 1992?
Originally Posted by davidh777
(Post 10748858)
I object to the poll because it includes full movie titles instead of first initials only
Originally Posted by wm lopez
(Post 10753679)
Yes, I know.
I ment to say he's given that bad guy performance before just like Jack's given that OFOTCN performance many times and that's how we know Jack. So his FEW GOOD MEN performance stands out. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.