View Poll Results: Which of the two is the biggest failure?
Star Wars Prequels




25
46.30%
Matris Reloaded and Revolutions




29
53.70%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll
Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
#2
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
There was a lot more hype and fan-base for the SWPT. Based on that I would say the SWPT didn't live up to expectations. However I would think that the SWPT made more profits. Just a guess on that I don't have the actual Box Office in front of me. LOL
#3
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
The Matrix sequels were a disappointing misstep after a very promising start, but I never questioned the filmmakers' sanity, nor cringed at the acting or dialogue.
Can't say the same for the Star Wars prequels.
Can't say the same for the Star Wars prequels.
#4
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
The Prequels, obviously. Lucas had well over a decade to think about how he was going to make the new set of films. That they suck so much is just flat-out unforgivable.
Last edited by SkinJob; 12-27-10 at 10:02 PM.
#5
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
Which franchise is still going strong? Oh wait, that's Star Wars. What is Star Wars' main focus media wise..Clone Wars AKA PT. When was the last time you saw ANYTHING related to the Matrix?
I think we know what was a bigger failure.
I think we know what was a bigger failure.
#6
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
I don't think Matrix was intended to continue on after the movies, while Star Wars is pretty much Lucas' whore.
I wasn't a big fan of the OT, and I still felt extremely let down with the PT.
I wasn't a big fan of the OT, and I still felt extremely let down with the PT.
#7
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
Matrix crammed all of its story in the third film. If it were more evenly spread to the second, people would have been much more satisfied with the result.
The prequels are guilty of the same, with Phantom Menace amounting to very little aside from an overbuilt setting that wasn't used effectively in the following films, Attack of the Clones was a pure, mindless action film, and only Revenge of the Sith bothering to tell the story the fans wanted.
I will say I find less wrong with Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions than I do with the prequels, despite enjoying both series'
The prequels are guilty of the same, with Phantom Menace amounting to very little aside from an overbuilt setting that wasn't used effectively in the following films, Attack of the Clones was a pure, mindless action film, and only Revenge of the Sith bothering to tell the story the fans wanted.
I will say I find less wrong with Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions than I do with the prequels, despite enjoying both series'
#9
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 7,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
Star Wars. No one continues to make jokes about how bad the Matrix films were, but the PT will always live on for comedic fodder.
#10
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
Finally, a question the Matrix can win. Just on acting alone, the Matrix films take it -- this may be the only time in history when someone can say, "Keanu Reeves is a better actor," but compared to the lumber pile of the prequels, he's frickin' Olivier.
#11
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,086
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
Star Wars, no question.
Lucas had almost 2 decades to write the most potentially awesome movies ever, and he completely fucking failed in almost every repsect.
Lucas had almost 2 decades to write the most potentially awesome movies ever, and he completely fucking failed in almost every repsect.
#12
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
I don't think any of them were a failure, most people enjoyed the movies and moved on. As for popular culture Star Wars wins (in the good way) hands down, I mean I can't tell you how many of my Facebook friends who have kids have all gotten Star Wars stuff and what no movies were released since 2005? Yeah the Star Wars Prequels may not have been that good but the younger generation still loves them!
#13
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Formerly known as "orangecrush18" - still legal though
Posts: 13,844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
In terms of popular culture, Star Wars wins in a landslide. What is the Matrix's Jar Jar?
#14
Banned by request
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
Revenge of the Sith is single-handedly better than either Matrix prequel, but Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones are arguably worse.
#16
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
There was always the possibility that the prequels would turn out bad. The Matrix sequels took a great story from the first film and mangled it beyond recognition. So they ended up being bigger disappointments. Who really thought Lucas was going to be able to create another trilogy on par with the most popular franchise in movie history?
#18
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
I don't agree with that. Yes, the dialogue sucked and the plot was convoluted as hell. But some great things were in the prequels.
I just can't think of anything atm. lol
#19
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
I was never the hugest fan of the original Star Wars trilogy to begin with but my feeling (and I'm sure many other people's as well) is that the whole prequel trilogy or at least the part that most people cared about could have been summed up in one movie. The only movie of the three I enjoyed to some degree was Revenge of the Sith. Plus the other thing I hated was how they basically made Anakin/Darth Vader into a tragic figure by showing us his rise and fall. I enjoyed the sort of mystique of the character in the original trilogy more.
The Matrix on the other hand I liked but not so much so that I was bothered that the sequels weren't as good.
The Matrix on the other hand I liked but not so much so that I was bothered that the sequels weren't as good.
#21
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
I mistakenly chose Matrix. But the more I think about it, a Giant Douche is WAY cooler than a Turd Sandwich...
#22
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Posts: 22,757
Received 439 Likes
on
308 Posts
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
Matrix.
I doubt I will ever watch those again. I'll watch the Star Wars prequels again.
Both will be remembered as disappointments, though.
I doubt I will ever watch those again. I'll watch the Star Wars prequels again.
Both will be remembered as disappointments, though.
#23
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Beverly, MA
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
Matrix by far. The PT is not as good for fans of the originals, but I know lots of kids that enjoy watching the PT (my nephew loves them for example, he's 12). I don't think anyone, of any age, likes the Matrix sequals.
#24
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
For clarification, I mean which set of sequels will be remembered as an "epic fail" moreso than the other. Not which one will pop culture remember more fondly. In short, which will have been the butt of more jokes when all is said and done.
#25
Re: Star Wars PT vs. Matrix II and III: which was the bigger failure
While I personally think the Matrix sequels are a bigger failure compared to the original than the Star Wars prequels are, by the criteria you've just stated, I'd have to say that the Star Wars prequels will be more likely to be remembered as an "epic fail", principally because I don't think too many people are going to remember much about the Matrix sequels. I saw both in the theatres and don't remember too much about them beyond the feeling of utter disappointment.