![]() |
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
I'll go with Inception just because I found it more entertaining. The Matrix is a well crafted action/scifi flick but the dialog and wooden delivery was just so damn boring to me when I saw it in theaters -- especially once Neo wakes up in the "real" world the first time. Anything that happend on that ship was snooze worthy, and I did almost nod off a time or two. The fight scenes were pretty laughable and the leather outfits were silly. The gun scenes and helicopter scene were great, though. I also couldn't shake the feeling of "Ghost in the Shell meets Dark City." while watching it... it didn't help that I was also watching the series Serial Experiments Lain at the time.
Inception had a boring action scene (the James Bond one) but otherwise I enjoyed it. eXistenZ was easily the best "Computer Reality" movie of 99 (competing with The Matrix and Thirteenth Floor) and was extremely enjoyable. Dark City is one of my all time favorites as well. |
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by scott1598
(Post 10530308)
truly surprised for the seemingly lack of love for Inception.
Too much explanatory exposition, too much dry conversation, too pretentious. I have a bad memory, so I think I'll just watch it every 7 or so years and be wowed by it each time. |
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by scott1598
(Post 10530308)
truly surprised for the seemingly lack of love for Inception.
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
I personally like Inception more but I guess I've just never been all that big on The Matrix. Its a good movie and I own it but I wouldn't really call it a favorite. Kinda surprised at the backlash Inception seems to be getting.
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10530371)
I'm pleasantly surprised. I practically got thrown out of the Inception thread for daring to not like it.
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
My roommate does Blu-ray QC, and he'd come home every night he worked on Inception with a whole new set of complaints about how the movie makes no sense. :lol: He doesn't hate it as much as Avatar, but it's close.
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by Sessa17
(Post 10530411)
:thumbsup: Same here, for being one of the few people not buying it this week, its seems like lemmings rushing out to get this on Blu-Ray. I don't know where these people have been hiding that suddenly are realizing that the movie isn't nearly as smart as it fools people into thinking it is, but I've seen nothing but blind love for the film here, so I don't know why people are feeling otherwise all of a sudden.
I found it to be an entertaining action/heist movie with visuals that should look fantastic on BD. :shrug: |
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by Sessa17
(Post 10530411)
:thumbsup: Same here, for being one of the few people not buying it this week, its seems like lemmings rushing out to get this on Blu-Ray. I don't know where these people have been hiding that suddenly are realizing that the movie isn't nearly as smart as it fools people into thinking it is, but I've seen nothing but blind love for the film here, so I don't know why people are feeling otherwise all of a sudden.
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by gryffinmaster
(Post 10530434)
Alright, you've mentioned many times now how Inception fools and lures people into thinking it's smart.
How are all of us sheep being coaxed by the film, and why exactly is it blind love? |
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
I agree with all of your points, Sessa. Group hug?
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by Sessa17
Its blind love because of the hardons for Nolan here that get bent out of shape if someone actually offers a different opinion and criticize him in any way. Inception has some cool visuals, all of which were in the initial full trailer and the film itself never offered anything more. The story is straight-foward and spells everything out with endless bromide exposition while sacrificing character development (or depth) and never once actually requires the audience to think, yet people get suckered into a cliched ambiguous ending that causes endless posts and about how briliant the movie was when it was anything but.
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by Sessa17
(Post 10530469)
I never called anyone sheep.
Its blind love because of the hardons for Nolan here that get bent out of shape if someone actually offers a different opinion and criticize him in any way. |
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10530481)
I agree with all of your points, Sessa. Group hug?
Spoiler:
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Oh, don't worry, there's plenty we disagree on.
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by kefrank
(Post 10530508)
In what way is calling people lemmings different? The implication is exactly the same. Arguing semantics is just a deflection.
Sure, there are Nolan fanboys around, but many DVD Talkers have offered balanced and well-articulated arguments for the merits of Inception, which is far from "blind love." Your hyperbole is unwarranted and hurts your case against the movie. It makes you appear just as irrational as the Nolan fanboys. |
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
To me it feels like comparing The Beatles & Pink Floyd. Both bands do completely different things on me and to say one had better musicians or better songs is preposterous. I love "Strawberry Fields" and "Tomorrow Never Knows" to death but I can't live without "Speak to Me" or "Arnold Lane"
There is too much greatness to diminish one in order to benefit the other |
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
That one's easy. The Beatles > Pink Floyd by a wide margin.
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10530577)
That one's easy. The Beatles > Pink Floyd by a wide margin.
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
You set 'em up, I knock 'em down...
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by fumanstan
(Post 10530559)
Another Sessa post criticizing people that like something that reached a level of mainstream popularity is unsurprising to me.
|
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
If the legacy of the Matrix hadn't been tarnished by its sequels, this would be no contest.
And its not fair throwing Videodrome into the mix. Such a different film. |
Re: Matrix vs. Inception?
Originally Posted by AnonomusBob15
(Post 10531073)
If the legacy of the Matrix hadn't been tarnished by its sequels, this would be no contest.
Originally Posted by AnonomusBob15
(Post 10531073)
And its not fair throwing Videodrome into the mix. Such a better film.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.