![]() |
Movies You No Longer Defend
Basically, movies that you saw merit in when they were released, thought they were pretty good for you, and would defend them to people who disliked them. However, as time went on, you came to see that these really weren't what you thought and decided to quit putting forth the effort of making an argument in their favor.
Examples: -Van Helsing- thought it was fun, and owned the SE on DVD. However, as time went on , I saw it really was little more than a CGI mess. The third act really ruins what is a fun movie. -Matrix Revolutions- I thought it was awesome when I attended the "zero hour" event watching a new release at 9:00 in the morning. Thought it was even better on IMAX. However, IMAX can lead to an over-appraisal of movies IMO. Viewed on its own, this is quite a mess. Only if you watch it as the last third of a saga does it make sense. I still think Reloaded is a good one. -The Star Wars PT- I'll still say Revenge of the Sith was good, but only when compared to the first two. TPM was a case where I was so happy to have a new SW movie on the screen that I didn't care how crappy it seemed. However, once it hit video, the shortcomings really got amplified. AOTC just had a really strong ending that got me to leave the theater feeling excited and happy. After a point, I began to listen to my friends and realize there really was no way to make an argument in their defense that held water. |
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Lord of the Rings. Rage on, hobbits, it was good but it wasn't some kind of movie-altering experience the way Star Wars was. Master & Commander should have won best picture in '04, not RotK.
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Avatar
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by Blu Man
(Post 10449103)
Avatar
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
And within one reply the original intent of the OP is lost and this becomes yet another "overrated" thread.
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 10449169)
And within one reply the original intent of the OP is lost and this becomes yet another "overrated" thread.
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
The Boondock Saints
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Oh yeah, that's a good one. I used to love that movie. Watched it again recently and realized it was nowhere near as good as I once thought.
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
I've actually found myself becoming more defensive of movies over the last few years. There was a time when I distinguished between "good" and "bad" movies, as well as movies I liked and those I didn't. For instance, Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby would be a "bad" movie, but one I liked. In a lot of ways, I've become even more critical in my evaluation of a given film--I pay attention to little things that I once overlooked--but what I've found is that in the process I've become more accepting and forgiving.
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Face/Off
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
the Bone Collector. I really enjoyed this the first few times I saw it. I always talked it up and eventually took it to a friends house to watch it.. then flat out didn't enjoy it that time. There have been others like this.. but this is perhaps the best example in this situation.
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
<b>Gladiator</b> -I saw it 3 times in the theater, cheered when it won Best Picture, and watched the DVD over and over. Now its just silly compared to brainier epics like <b>TROY</b> (Director's Cut) and <b>Kingdom of Heaven</b> (Director's Cut).
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by Boba Fett
(Post 10449289)
The Boondock Saints
But I never needed to defend it. Everyone I know loves it. Now when it comes up in conversation, I'm the only one that's knocking it. |
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by Goat3001
(Post 10449890)
But I never needed to defend it. Everyone I know loves it. Now when it comes up in conversation, I'm the only one that's knocking it.
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by Robert
(Post 10449765)
<b>Gladiator</b> -I saw it 3 times in the theater, cheered when it won Best Picture, and watched the DVD over and over. Now its just silly compared to brainier epics like <b>TROY</b> (Director's Cut) and <b>Kingdom of Heaven</b> (Director's Cut).
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by Robert
(Post 10449765)
<b>Gladiator</b> -I saw it 3 times in the theater, cheered when it won Best Picture, and watched the DVD over and over. Now its just silly compared to brainier epics like <b>TROY</b> (Director's Cut) and <b>Kingdom of Heaven</b> (Director's Cut).
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
^hahaha
BTW I didn't know you could use the word 'brainier' while speaking about the movie 'Troy'. hehe I would have to say I don't really have any films that I vigorously defended at one point, but now cannot support. I have been pretty right on in my evaluations from the start. |
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
I was under the impression that the director's cut of Daredevil was actually enjoyed and respected by all seventeen of us who've bothered to see it. It's the theatrical cut no one bothers to defend, except as an opportunity to use the phrase, "You should see the director's cut; it's actually good."
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by foofighters7
(Post 10450077)
BTW I didn't know you could use the word 'brainier' while speaking about the movie 'Troy'. hehe
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10450124)
I was under the impression that the director's cut of Daredevil was actually enjoyed and respected by all seventeen of us who've bothered to see it. It's the theatrical cut no one bothers to defend, except as an opportunity to use the phrase, "You should see the director's cut; it's actually good."
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Having spent some time elsewhere online in the last half hour, I will say that I've grown very tired of all the Quantum of Solace haters. Their chief complaint seems to be that it wasn't Casino Royale.
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10450071)
Off-topic, but I was underwhelmed when I saw it during its theatrical release. It just felt...artificial, for lack of better word. It just felt like a studio production to me instead of the grand epic it aspired to be. It's been a decade since, though, so maybe I need to revisit it.
|
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10450219)
Having spent some time elsewhere online in the last half hour, I will say that I've grown very tired of all the Quantum of Solace haters. Their chief complaint seems to be that it wasn't Casino Royale.
Quantum of Solace is one I do not defend simply out of not wanting to put forth the effort on people who won't listen. The statement you make is accurate in that they all say it's not enough like Royale. I have to say if you watch Casino Royale and Solace back to back, it makes for one very well done story. |
Re: Movies You No Longer Defend
Originally Posted by devilshalo
(Post 10450118)
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.