View Poll Results: Inception Review Poll
Voters: 260. You may not vote on this poll
Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
#752
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
I didn't like this movie at all but it's not really my kind of thing to begin with. I'm surprised it's ranked #3 on IMDB, right below the Godfather. I expect it to sink in the ratings after a few weeks/months when the hype dies.
#753
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
But it seems that if people were generally going against Inception, it would be having larger drops and in its fourth weekend now, it only has a 32.3% drop (weekend 2: 32.0%, weekend 3: 35.7%), so I don't see it dropping that much.
Last edited by TheMovieman; 08-08-10 at 11:28 AM.
#754
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
A few questions regarding Inception...
1) How are different people supposed to be able to exist in limbo together even if they didn't all go there at the same time or by the same mechanism? Is this supposed to be some form of hive mind idea?
2) How could Cobb and Ariadne go to limbo by using one of their little dream boxes when the other characters had to die while sedated to get in there?
3) Why is everything in limbo from the imagination of Cobb? Surely he and his wife aren't the only ones who have gone there. Is the suggestion that this is an actual place that anyone can visit but that nobody has since the time Cobb and his wife were there?
4) Why is Michael Caine in the movie for only 2 minutes. And why does he appear at the airport right at the end when he hasn't been in on the mission (supposedly) at all?
5) If Cobb is in fact dreaming the entire thing then does that mean all of the other characters are constructs of his imagination as well? In that case shouldn't there be more bizarre "dreamlike" aspects to the story - people with horses heads, famous animated characters and the like? The idea of an artificial maze dream world with tightly controlled limits negates this point but not if Cobb is in fact dreaming the entire story (except perhaps the ending).
1) How are different people supposed to be able to exist in limbo together even if they didn't all go there at the same time or by the same mechanism? Is this supposed to be some form of hive mind idea?
2) How could Cobb and Ariadne go to limbo by using one of their little dream boxes when the other characters had to die while sedated to get in there?
3) Why is everything in limbo from the imagination of Cobb? Surely he and his wife aren't the only ones who have gone there. Is the suggestion that this is an actual place that anyone can visit but that nobody has since the time Cobb and his wife were there?
4) Why is Michael Caine in the movie for only 2 minutes. And why does he appear at the airport right at the end when he hasn't been in on the mission (supposedly) at all?
5) If Cobb is in fact dreaming the entire thing then does that mean all of the other characters are constructs of his imagination as well? In that case shouldn't there be more bizarre "dreamlike" aspects to the story - people with horses heads, famous animated characters and the like? The idea of an artificial maze dream world with tightly controlled limits negates this point but not if Cobb is in fact dreaming the entire story (except perhaps the ending).
#755
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hail to the Redskins!
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes
on
38 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Sort of answering BT (and I'm sure mentioned in one of the 31 pages of this thread that I didn't read since I only saw the movie 24 hours ago), but my first impression was the the WHOLE movie was a dream. When I found out that Page's character was named Ariadne, that was another big clue to me. As might have been mentioned, Ariadne let Theseus out of the labyrinth.
So here's a sort of explanation of Inception:
* Dom is stuck in limbo and refuses to leave
* A trusted avatar (his father) sends in Ariadne to help get him out
* Dom instantly trusts Ariadne because he can identify with her talents in the dreamscape
* Ariadne then leads Dom out of Limbo through the Fischer construct (by making it so Dom thinks that he is working out of Fischer's limbo, not his own)
* The ending is real, he is finally out of limbo
We'll never really know for sure unless Nolan ever says (and he won't). So my interpretation can be as right or as wrong as possible.
So here's a sort of explanation of Inception:
* Dom is stuck in limbo and refuses to leave
* A trusted avatar (his father) sends in Ariadne to help get him out
* Dom instantly trusts Ariadne because he can identify with her talents in the dreamscape
* Ariadne then leads Dom out of Limbo through the Fischer construct (by making it so Dom thinks that he is working out of Fischer's limbo, not his own)
* The ending is real, he is finally out of limbo
We'll never really know for sure unless Nolan ever says (and he won't). So my interpretation can be as right or as wrong as possible.
#756
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
#757
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
#758
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
There was a decent thread here about the Minority Report ending. Personally, I don't buy it, but its an interesting theory.
#759
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,284
Received 1,802 Likes
on
1,125 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Right. I'm not saying the ending Minority Report was a dream. I'm just saying I remember that the question did come up in the MR thread years ago and Inception's ending made me think of this.
#760
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,284
Received 1,802 Likes
on
1,125 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
A few questions regarding Inception...
1) How are different people supposed to be able to exist in limbo together even if they didn't all go there at the same time or by the same mechanism? Is this supposed to be some form of hive mind idea?
2) How could Cobb and Ariadne go to limbo by using one of their little dream boxes when the other characters had to die while sedated to get in there?
3) Why is everything in limbo from the imagination of Cobb? Surely he and his wife aren't the only ones who have gone there. Is the suggestion that this is an actual place that anyone can visit but that nobody has since the time Cobb and his wife were there?
4) Why is Michael Caine in the movie for only 2 minutes. And why does he appear at the airport right at the end when he hasn't been in on the mission (supposedly) at all?
5) If Cobb is in fact dreaming the entire thing then does that mean all of the other characters are constructs of his imagination as well? In that case shouldn't there be more bizarre "dreamlike" aspects to the story - people with horses heads, famous animated characters and the like? The idea of an artificial maze dream world with tightly controlled limits negates this point but not if Cobb is in fact dreaming the entire story (except perhaps the ending).
1) How are different people supposed to be able to exist in limbo together even if they didn't all go there at the same time or by the same mechanism? Is this supposed to be some form of hive mind idea?
2) How could Cobb and Ariadne go to limbo by using one of their little dream boxes when the other characters had to die while sedated to get in there?
3) Why is everything in limbo from the imagination of Cobb? Surely he and his wife aren't the only ones who have gone there. Is the suggestion that this is an actual place that anyone can visit but that nobody has since the time Cobb and his wife were there?
4) Why is Michael Caine in the movie for only 2 minutes. And why does he appear at the airport right at the end when he hasn't been in on the mission (supposedly) at all?
5) If Cobb is in fact dreaming the entire thing then does that mean all of the other characters are constructs of his imagination as well? In that case shouldn't there be more bizarre "dreamlike" aspects to the story - people with horses heads, famous animated characters and the like? The idea of an artificial maze dream world with tightly controlled limits negates this point but not if Cobb is in fact dreaming the entire story (except perhaps the ending).
2) I think they said that Cobb had been their before and this was why he could go again and even take someone with him.
3) See #2
4) Yeah I thought Caine was in France(A University Professor?) and the kids were with their Grandmother in America? Why was Caine suddenly in America? Reading DVD Josh's post may answer this...
5) Yeah, it's interesting that these characters had so much control. I mean we never saw a dragon or weird spaceship or anything.
Last edited by Giantrobo; 08-08-10 at 02:49 PM.
#761
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
I'm in the same boat. The times I have seen it, I never got an inkling that it was a dream either.
#762
Banned by request
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Personally I think Minority Report ends terribly unless it's a dream, in which case, it works perfectly.
Here's a good summary of why I think it has to be a dream:
http://www.flakmag.com/film/spielberg/minority.html
Here's a good summary of why I think it has to be a dream:
http://www.flakmag.com/film/spielberg/minority.html
#763
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,284
Received 1,802 Likes
on
1,125 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/...rs-within.html
#764
Banned by request
#765
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
What's wrong with Minority Report ending somewhat happily? Why is it terrible if Tom Cruise doesn't end up wasting away in that frozen prison or whatever it was?
I'm sorry but I really can't think of any other examples off the top of my head, but I know there are examples out there where people just don't like an ambigious ending if it turns out to be happy, but if it ends up as a "sad" ending then it's brilliant.
Just looking at your statement...it's the same movie. One has a happy ending and one has a sad ending. Why is the happy ending terrible and the sad ending perfect?
#766
Moderator
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
As stated in another thread, there's an adolescent/film-student mentality that likes to re-interpret every movie to be a dream. It usually paves the way for deeper film criticism, so I guess there's no harm.
#767
Banned by request
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Not necessarily calling you out or anything, but it seems like often some people only think a movie ends well if it ends on a sour or downer note.
What's wrong with Minority Report ending somewhat happily? Why is it terrible if Tom Cruise doesn't end up wasting away in that frozen prison or whatever it was?
I'm sorry but I really can't think of any other examples off the top of my head, but I know there are examples out there where people just don't like an ambigious ending if it turns out to be happy, but if it ends up as a "sad" ending then it's brilliant.
Just looking at your statement...it's the same movie. One has a happy ending and one has a sad ending. Why is the happy ending terrible and the sad ending perfect?
What's wrong with Minority Report ending somewhat happily? Why is it terrible if Tom Cruise doesn't end up wasting away in that frozen prison or whatever it was?
I'm sorry but I really can't think of any other examples off the top of my head, but I know there are examples out there where people just don't like an ambigious ending if it turns out to be happy, but if it ends up as a "sad" ending then it's brilliant.
Just looking at your statement...it's the same movie. One has a happy ending and one has a sad ending. Why is the happy ending terrible and the sad ending perfect?
Spoiler:
Minority Report is a sci-fi noir, and noirs tend to end unhappily (not always, but often), and it's also based on a story by Philip K. Dick, a man not known for being all sunshine and roses.
So it's not that all happy endings are bad and all downer endings are good, it's about the context. And in the context of Minority Report, a happy ending doesn't play. Another great example is yet another Philip K. Dick sci-fi noir adaption, Blade Runner. The theatrical cut has a tacked on happy ending that is entirely as hokey as the ending of Minority Report. Take off the happy ending, and you get a film masterpiece. With Minority Report, if the ending is a dream, the movie makes sense.
#768
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Actually, the short story Minority Report, which the movie only tangentially resembles, had a happy ending for the protagonist.
#770
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
#771
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,284
Received 1,802 Likes
on
1,125 Posts
#772
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,284
Received 1,802 Likes
on
1,125 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
But seriously, I get what you're saying.
It usually paves the way for deeper film criticism, so I guess there's no harm.
[/thread] Groucho has spoken.
#773
Banned by request
#774
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Minority Report was always pretty concrete for years until I visited DVD Talk.
#775
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,284
Received 1,802 Likes
on
1,125 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
We will agree to disagree. In my opinion it's a fair comparison.