View Poll Results: Inception Review Poll
Voters: 260. You may not vote on this poll
Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
#576
DVD Talk Hero
#577
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Finally saw it; really enjoyed it but not as an immediate hit with me as The Prestige, The Dark Knight, or Memento were. I agree with what was said earlier that the characters weren't as developed in relation to the audience but because of the vast amount of them, Nolan gets appreciation.
I do think that
The end was more of a "trick" than another completely plausible interpretation, emphasized by the little smirk Caine projects to the camera. I would have liked to have seen each dream in the dreamer's POV as in how real dreams are to real individuals but that would have been more of an art house take than a commercial one.
Will need to see it in IMAX as there is a definite issue with the center channel when it comes to the dialogue, particularly in the beginning of the film.
I do think that
Spoiler:
The end was more of a "trick" than another completely plausible interpretation, emphasized by the little smirk Caine projects to the camera. I would have liked to have seen each dream in the dreamer's POV as in how real dreams are to real individuals but that would have been more of an art house take than a commercial one.
Will need to see it in IMAX as there is a definite issue with the center channel when it comes to the dialogue, particularly in the beginning of the film.
#578
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Saw the film yesterday and enjoyed it although it had some flaws (the third level dragged, a couple of the action scenes were confusingly shot & Watanabe's old man make-up being 3 of them)
as for the
I would like to hear what people think of that scene and my view of it.
as for the
Spoiler:
I would like to hear what people think of that scene and my view of it.
#579
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Saw the film yesterday and enjoyed it although it had some flaws (the third level dragged, a couple of the action scenes were confusingly shot & Watanabe's old man make-up being 3 of them)
as for the
I would like to hear what people think of that scene and my view of it.
as for the
Spoiler:
I would like to hear what people think of that scene and my view of it.
pretty sure they were in the same suite...just had some visually confusing architecture.
#580
DVD Talk Legend
#581
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 9,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
^Disagree entirely. I've seen it 3 times and there is really nothing that suggests it's a dream in that part. His arm waving doesn't tell us anything other than he wants her to come inside...I don't think the scene changes drastically if he POINTED at the window behind her instead - it's just the general "get inside" idea being conveyed. If anything I'd put that blame on Leo, but it wasn't a deliberate 'clue'. People want this movie to be a lot more complex & ambiguous than it actually is.
#582
Moderator
#583
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
^Disagree entirely. I've seen it 3 times and there is really nothing that suggests it's a dream in that part. His arm waving doesn't tell us anything other than he wants her to come inside...I don't think the scene changes drastically if he POINTED at the window behind her instead - it's just the general "get inside" idea being conveyed. If anything I'd put that blame on Leo, but it wasn't a deliberate 'clue'. People want this movie to be a lot more complex & ambiguous than it actually is.
#584
DVD Talk Legend
#585
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
^Disagree entirely. I've seen it 3 times and there is really nothing that suggests it's a dream in that part. His arm waving doesn't tell us anything other than he wants her to come inside...I don't think the scene changes drastically if he POINTED at the window behind her instead - it's just the general "get inside" idea being conveyed. If anything I'd put that blame on Leo, but it wasn't a deliberate 'clue'. People want this movie to be a lot more complex & ambiguous than it actually is.
#586
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
I do think it's apparently a confusing architecture for some, which is causing them to make an assumption that isn't true (the windows are in different buildings), leading to interpretations that are thus incorrect.
Note that I don't think that the fact that the windows are part of the same building necessarily disproves that that sequence is part of a dream. However, the sequence isn't as clearly a dream as some think it is, and could easily be reality (which I think it is).
#587
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
^Disagree entirely. I've seen it 3 times and there is really nothing that suggests it's a dream in that part. His arm waving doesn't tell us anything other than he wants her to come inside...I don't think the scene changes drastically if he POINTED at the window behind her instead - it's just the general "get inside" idea being conveyed. If anything I'd put that blame on Leo, but it wasn't a deliberate 'clue'. People want this movie to be a lot more complex & ambiguous than it actually is.
#589
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
#591
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Over at Blu-Ray.com, someone noted that all the dream sequences are shot with a different lens than the reality sequences. I'll see if I can find the post. It'd be a good thing to watch out for at the end in order to lay these theories to rest.
I'm in the "not a dream" camp, by the way. But I wouldn't mind being proven wrong.
EDIT: Dammit. I can't find the post. Maybe I saw it at a different forum.
I'm in the "not a dream" camp, by the way. But I wouldn't mind being proven wrong.
EDIT: Dammit. I can't find the post. Maybe I saw it at a different forum.
Last edited by RocShemp; 07-29-10 at 01:39 PM.
#592
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Regardless, only about 1 out of a thousand movie-goers would pick up on the Cotillard/Piaf connection.
But as to the score; it is the music they hear before they're supposed to wake up (slowed down). So what the music is actually saying to the audience: wake up! wake up! Which makes it even more obvious that the movie is supposed to be entirely a dream.
#593
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Ah, an actual unintended coincidence!
Regardless, only about 1 out of a thousand movie-goers would pick up on the Cotillard/Piaf connection.
But as to the score; it is the music they hear before they're supposed to wake up (slowed down). So what the music is actually saying to the audience: wake up! wake up! Which makes it even more obvious that the movie is supposed to be entirely a dream.
Regardless, only about 1 out of a thousand movie-goers would pick up on the Cotillard/Piaf connection.
But as to the score; it is the music they hear before they're supposed to wake up (slowed down). So what the music is actually saying to the audience: wake up! wake up! Which makes it even more obvious that the movie is supposed to be entirely a dream.
Spoiler:
#594
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Over at Blu-Ray.com, someone noted that all the dream sequences are shot with a different lens than the reality sequences. I'll see if I can find the post. It'd be a good thing to watch out for at the end in order to lay these theories to rest.
I'm in the "not a dream" camp, by the way. But I wouldn't mind being proven wrong.
EDIT: Dammit. I can't find the post. Maybe I saw it at a different forum.
I'm in the "not a dream" camp, by the way. But I wouldn't mind being proven wrong.
EDIT: Dammit. I can't find the post. Maybe I saw it at a different forum.
#595
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Ah, an actual unintended coincidence!
Regardless, only about 1 out of a thousand movie-goers would pick up on the Cotillard/Piaf connection.
But as to the score; it is the music they hear before they're supposed to wake up (slowed down). So what the music is actually saying to the audience: wake up! wake up! Which makes it even more obvious that the movie is supposed to be entirely a dream.
Regardless, only about 1 out of a thousand movie-goers would pick up on the Cotillard/Piaf connection.
But as to the score; it is the music they hear before they're supposed to wake up (slowed down). So what the music is actually saying to the audience: wake up! wake up! Which makes it even more obvious that the movie is supposed to be entirely a dream.
Somebody on another forum made a point about Cobb's wedding ring -- he doesn't wear it in reality, but the second they're in a dream, there it is.
#596
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Saw the film yesterday and enjoyed it although it had some flaws (the third level dragged, a couple of the action scenes were confusingly shot & Watanabe's old man make-up being 3 of them)
as for the
I would like to hear what people think of that scene and my view of it.
as for the
Spoiler:
I would like to hear what people think of that scene and my view of it.
#597
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Over at Blu-Ray.com, someone noted that all the dream sequences are shot with a different lens than the reality sequences. I'll see if I can find the post. It'd be a good thing to watch out for at the end in order to lay these theories to rest.
I'm in the "not a dream" camp, by the way. But I wouldn't mind being proven wrong.
EDIT: Dammit. I can't find the post. Maybe I saw it at a different forum.
I'm in the "not a dream" camp, by the way. But I wouldn't mind being proven wrong.
EDIT: Dammit. I can't find the post. Maybe I saw it at a different forum.
#598
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 75 clicks above the Do Lung bridge...
Posts: 18,946
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Saw it in a theatre today.
5 stars. Loved it.
Those Hollywood guys get all the cool firepower lined up for movies. Those ACR's and SCAR's were awesome
5 stars. Loved it.
Those Hollywood guys get all the cool firepower lined up for movies. Those ACR's and SCAR's were awesome
#599
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Posts: 20,052
Received 168 Likes
on
126 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
I saw this 2 weeks ago and I've been waiting for someone to bring up the russian film Stalker. The final moment of Inception (the top) seems clearly derived from the last shot of Stalker.
Reading the last shot of Inception as an homage to Stalker pretty much solves the riddle of Inception. And the solution is:
There is no right or wrong answer. The audience can believe it's a dream or they can believe it's real. It's a test of the audiences own faith and you can decide for yourself, or wonder forever.
Reading the last shot of Inception as an homage to Stalker pretty much solves the riddle of Inception. And the solution is:
There is no right or wrong answer. The audience can believe it's a dream or they can believe it's real. It's a test of the audiences own faith and you can decide for yourself, or wonder forever.
#600
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
SPOILERS
The whole film is not a dream. The clue is the score. There's a piece of Zimmer's score where there's a second hand ticking. This ticking never shows up in any of the dream sequences, but it does in reality: Paris and Mombasa. It ties into the beginning of the movie where it shows the second hand ticking normally once we're back in reality.
The other aspect of the film is Mal's jump. Everyone seems to assume that she magically jumped across a chasm to get to the ledge she's on.
First off, they are not in their apartment. It is the suite they get to celebrate every anniversary. So it was known what room it would be. Mal got there early and trashed the place to make sure it looked like Cobb had gone crazy. Now, since the floor plan of the hotel is E-shaped, she went down the hall to a different room, but one that she knew would face the window. This way, there was no way for Cobb to stop her / pull her in. Remember, she planned it for a long time: she wrote the letter to the attorney, got tests to show she was sane, etc.
What makes it confusing is that in Cobb's "prison" for her, she's shown in the hotel suite, not across the hall. But that's in Cobb's dream, not in the reality of the past.
Another point I wanted to address was Saito(?)'s "one phone call" to rescue Cobb. Technically, he could've begun to make arrangements weeks in advance. Then, when he was on the plane, he simply said something along the lines of, "Yes, let him through" to whomever his contact was.
A few other thoughts, that may or may not be interrelated and/or true:
- Page's character was a plant by Michael Caine's character. She knew how to build dreams and was showing off to Cobb so that he would agree to bring her into the dream. Her goal was not to be the architect, but to "fix" Cobb and make him OK with his guilt.
- This could mean that the final scene is a dream of Caine's planning.
- Or that the entire team was in on it.
- Or that Cobb could always go back to the US, but his guilt prevented him from doing that and he imagined he would be persecuted.
- When Cobb is talking with his kids, we hear an exchange along the lines of:
"I told you Mom is not around."
"Oh, she's not here."
"What do you mean here?"
The "here" has a double meaning. I don't remember the exchange exactly.
The whole film is not a dream. The clue is the score. There's a piece of Zimmer's score where there's a second hand ticking. This ticking never shows up in any of the dream sequences, but it does in reality: Paris and Mombasa. It ties into the beginning of the movie where it shows the second hand ticking normally once we're back in reality.
The other aspect of the film is Mal's jump. Everyone seems to assume that she magically jumped across a chasm to get to the ledge she's on.
First off, they are not in their apartment. It is the suite they get to celebrate every anniversary. So it was known what room it would be. Mal got there early and trashed the place to make sure it looked like Cobb had gone crazy. Now, since the floor plan of the hotel is E-shaped, she went down the hall to a different room, but one that she knew would face the window. This way, there was no way for Cobb to stop her / pull her in. Remember, she planned it for a long time: she wrote the letter to the attorney, got tests to show she was sane, etc.
What makes it confusing is that in Cobb's "prison" for her, she's shown in the hotel suite, not across the hall. But that's in Cobb's dream, not in the reality of the past.
Another point I wanted to address was Saito(?)'s "one phone call" to rescue Cobb. Technically, he could've begun to make arrangements weeks in advance. Then, when he was on the plane, he simply said something along the lines of, "Yes, let him through" to whomever his contact was.
A few other thoughts, that may or may not be interrelated and/or true:
- Page's character was a plant by Michael Caine's character. She knew how to build dreams and was showing off to Cobb so that he would agree to bring her into the dream. Her goal was not to be the architect, but to "fix" Cobb and make him OK with his guilt.
- This could mean that the final scene is a dream of Caine's planning.
- Or that the entire team was in on it.
- Or that Cobb could always go back to the US, but his guilt prevented him from doing that and he imagined he would be persecuted.
- When Cobb is talking with his kids, we hear an exchange along the lines of:
"I told you Mom is not around."
"Oh, she's not here."
"What do you mean here?"
The "here" has a double meaning. I don't remember the exchange exactly.