![]() |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
I saw this quote on RT for Toy Story 3, it seems fitting for here:
I wish I could be one of the few to hate on this movie, it'd drive up my traffic numbers. But I can't, it has an Evil Stuffed Bear! Toy Story 3 is not perfect, but it's strong. This coming from a Pixar Hater. |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10222016)
While I disagree that Toy Story 3 is objectively fantastic and should not be criticized, I do agree that White and Cole present paper-thin arguments that rely more on outside elements than they do on Toy Story 3. White's review reads like "Toy Story 3 isn't good because Movie X is good. And you're an idiot if you disagree."
Meanwhile, Saying things like That alone makes Jonah Hex the best movie to open this week—easily overshadowing Toy Story 3. |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Never heard of this guy until yesterday. I already don't like him.
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Having a 100% rate on rotten tomatoes doesn't reflect reality. It's wrong to think everyone should love certain movies, as it's all a matter of taste.
Anyway, I find him interesting and thought provoking. |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by beer me
(Post 10222311)
Having a 100% rate on rotten tomatoes doesn't reflect reality. It's wrong to think everyone should love certain movies, as it's all a matter of taste.
Anyway, I find him interesting and thought provoking. |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
his combined review for 'The Karate Kid' and 'The Lottery' is a nearly illogical barrage of pretentious smugness from a review who thinks his opinion is superior in every possible way. For all his 'trollness' it's this type of recognition that just fuels him - he doesn't care, At least when the New Yorker reviews movies they consider 'bad' they are funny, White's reviews though, you just want to go up to him on the street and say 'fuck you' into his face.
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Indifferent. His ignorance and intellectual trolling isn't worth my time.
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by Boba Fett
(Post 10222417)
Indifferent. His ignorance and intellectual trolling isn't worth my time.
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by beer me
(Post 10222311)
Having a 100% rate on rotten tomatoes doesn't reflect reality. It's wrong to think everyone should love certain movies, as it's all a matter of taste.
Anyway, I find him interesting and thought provoking. As I said, I enjoy critics who don't pander to the mainstream and offer interesting takes on minor films...but White is nothing but a schtick - a pathetically predictable contrarian schtick. I will be you a million dollars that the next film to come out this summer sporting 90% or better reviews on RT will get a pan from White - while within the next week or two he'll call some piece of shit with less than 25% positives a "work of art" or a classic comedy in the tradition of Chaplin or some other bullshit hyperbole. that's thought provoking? |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Never heard of him. He's a film critic and not an actual filmmaker therefore he's got nothing on Uwe Boll.
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Armond White is funny and that is his shtick. I dont like Rush Limbaugh or Hannity either but I understand that they have a certain shtick that entertains people. There is always someone like this in all entertainment fields. Would I want Rush Limbaugh shot in the head? Yes, I wouldnt mind if someone took him out. Is he good addition to talk radio? Yes, he is entertaining. Maybe people feel the same towards Armond White.
I wonder if the poll should really be "who is upset that toy story 3 didnt become the most perfect reviewed movie in movie history" |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Armond White is brilliant. You guys could learn something by reading him. He's not a cheerleader for mainstream Hollywood moviemaking like A.O. Scott (New York Times), who can be brilliant at times, but too often sells his soul to be in the majority and keep his job. Being first string critic at the Times is too much of a balancing act. Because White works for a crummy giveaway weekly, he can speak his mind and tell the Emperor he has no clothes. (I remember when New York Press was a great weekly, full of superb writers and far more interesting than the Village Voice. But then Russ Smith sold it and all the good writers left. Now all it's got is White.)
The only critic I'd place above White is the Voice's J. Hoberman. Coincidentally, both of them, along with Kenneth Turan at the...LA Times?...were the only critics to compare TITANIC unfavorably with THE POSEIDON ADVENTURE. I loved them for it. |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Read his review of 'The Hurt Locker' and then his sudden change of heart on his 'Better-Than' list, AFTER it's become a critically acclaimed hit:
"Jim Sheridan finds the emotional substance of our Iraq War years while Kathryn Bigelow hides behind genre skill. By avoiding a moral or political stand, Bigelow’s movie says nothing to anyone—especially liberals." The man's a fucking idiot. |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
He lives under a bridge and eats sheep. Why would anyone care what he spews.
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 10222599)
Armond White is brilliant. You guys could learn something by reading him. He's not a cheerleader for mainstream Hollywood moviemaking like A.O. Scott (New York Times), who can be brilliant at times, but too often sells his soul to be in the majority and keep his job. Being first string critic at the Times is too much of a balancing act. Because White works for a crummy giveaway weekly, he can speak his mind and tell the Emperor he has no clothes. (I remember when New York Press was a great weekly, full of superb writers and far more interesting than the Village Voice. But then Russ Smith sold it and all the good writers left. Now all it's got is White.)
The only critic I'd place above White is the Voice's J. Hoberman. Coincidentally, both of them, along with Kenneth Turan at the...LA Times?...were the only critics to compare TITANIC unfavorably with THE POSEIDON ADVENTURE. I loved them for it. |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by arminius
(Post 10222643)
He lives under a bridge and eats sheep. Why would anyone care what he spews.
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by Dragon Tattoo
(Post 10222673)
So you think Transformers 2 is the pinnacle of action cinema as well?
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 10222781)
Oh Christ, here we go... :lol:
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10222584)
I wonder if the poll should really be "who is upset that toy story 3 didnt become the most perfect reviewed movie in movie history"
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 10222599)
Armond White is brilliant. You guys could learn something by reading him. He's not a cheerleader for mainstream Hollywood moviemaking like A.O. Scott (New York Times), who can be brilliant at times, but too often sells his soul to be in the majority and keep his job. Being first string critic at the Times is too much of a balancing act. Because White works for a crummy giveaway weekly, he can speak his mind and tell the Emperor he has no clothes. (I remember when New York Press was a great weekly, full of superb writers and far more interesting than the Village Voice. But then Russ Smith sold it and all the good writers left. Now all it's got is White.)
The only critic I'd place above White is the Voice's J. Hoberman. Coincidentally, both of them, along with Kenneth Turan at the...LA Times?...were the only critics to compare TITANIC unfavorably with THE POSEIDON ADVENTURE. I loved them for it. Also, hating obviously good movies doesn't make him brilliant it just makes him wrong. And no, "It's my opinion" is not always a valid point. |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by dx23
(Post 10222821)
He has a point though. People here that think he is a guy that calls it like he sees it are just wrong. Armond criticizes Toy Story 3 for product placement, but doesn't do the same to Transformers 2, which is a commercial masked as a film. People here that like him haven't read his reviews, much like Ebert hadn't when he wrote a piece defending him. When he found out later the way White operates and read more of White's reviews, he did a 180 and completely change his stance, since an asshole like Armond just gives film critics a bad name.
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
Originally Posted by Gunde
(Post 10222860)
Still doesn't explain his love for Transformers 2 and Jonah Hex.
Also, hating obviously good movies doesn't make him brilliant it just makes him wrong. And no, "It's my opinion" is not always a valid point. |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
After reading these, I can't wait for the Eclipse review:
http://www.nypress.com/article-18961...ever-dies.html http://www.nypress.com/article-20632...-new-moon.html |
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
It still has 100% from the "top critics"....so who cares what these two idiots have to say.
|
Re: Armond White: The Love Him or Hate Him Thread
White generates more income for his site and more attention for himself with this shtick than he could as a conventional critic. It's the same tactic used by Fred Phelps, who is better-known that pretty much any American religious leader not named Graham.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.