![]() |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Go home Dooku, you're drunk.
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Solid Snake
(Post 12613837)
What the fuck are you sucking on to get that in your noggin, mate?
No. He's got his Oscars, he's in the history books, and is still loved. I think he's done well w/ himself. |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
And yes, he has two Oscars, but he didn't bank the nominations that really signify a career of achievement. |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12613667)
Exactly, so if Leonardo Dicaprio gets to that age and still doesnt have one, give him the honorary Oscar.
I don't get the obsession people have with those two and how they "deserve" an Oscar. Speaking of Hackman and deserve, he should have won the Oscar for best actor in 1989 for Mississippi Burning over Dustin Hoffman for Rain Man. |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 12613936)
Whose fault would that be? Does he not choose what roles to take? He won for French Connection and Unforgiven. Those are some fucking masterpieces. He's good.
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
What if he was? You son of a bitch, leave him alone!
http://maxcdn.fooyoh.com/files/attac...is_crocker.jpg |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 12614088)
You sound like you hate the guy. Were you gang-raped by an Indiana basketball team?
Relax, dude. You're the one with the Hackman hard on. |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 12614133)
Relax, dude. You're the one with the Hackman hard on.
I am clearly insane. |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by inri222
(Post 12613978)
Speaking of Hackman and deserve, he should have won the Oscar for best actor in 1989 for Mississippi Burning over Dustin Hoffman for Rain Man. |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 12614281)
I thought it would be nice if someone who I consider a great actor with a long and distinguished career was given a celebratory acknowledgement while he is still alive and can appreciate it.
I am clearly insane. It would be redundant. He already has TWO for his actual achievements. Those are better than some "congrats for being a cool actor" award. |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 12614290)
It would be redundant. He already has TWO for his actual achievements. Those are better than some "congrats for being a cool actor" award.
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 12613626)
Some would say the two he has are enough reward.
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
His Lex Luthor performance is severely underrated. He proved he has comedy chops along with his dramatic genius.
One of my favorite scenes of all time is when his Luthor turns from comedic to menacing at the turn of a dime when Superman opens the lead box to reveal the kryptonite. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/OkSaAhbceBk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
I'm ok with his getting an "honorary" Oscar. I don't like the term "honorary" though. Makes it sound like a consolation prize. Not quite as good as the "real thing".
It's image should be changed to the ultimate honor. Given for a career that may or may not include previous wins. The pinnacle. "I've got three best actor Oscars" "So what? I've got an honorary Oscar. Now bring my car around." |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 12614298)
Duh.
:confused: |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Super X
(Post 12613835)
Damn straight. They should go to people who gave numerous Oscar-worthy performances but were never awarded an Oscar.
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
is superduper a spam whore?
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
I think he should have his 2 Oscars taken away and then award him the honorary Oscar
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Jaymole
(Post 12614767)
I think he should have his 2 Oscars taken away and then award him the honorary Oscar
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by inri222
(Post 12613978)
Speaking of Hackman and deserve, he should have won the Oscar for best actor in 1989 for Mississippi Burning over Dustin Hoffman for Rain Man. <iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/a2XTXHKcUPY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
As has been mentioned, the Honorary Oscar isn't really meant for guys like Hackman who already have a collection of actual Oscars. Look at who has won it. The list is full of people who were nominated x number of times but never won. That's what it's for.
As far as comparisons to Nicholson (12 noms, 3 wins), Pacino (8,1), Hoffman (7,2) and DeNiro (7,2), his 5 nominations and 2 wins aren't really that far off from what those other guys have. Aside from Royal Tenenbaums, which I thought he should have been nominated for, it's not like his post-Unforgiven resume is littered with typical Academy fodder. He's great. We all like him. He doesn't need the Honorary Oscar.
Originally Posted by Double_Oh_7
(Post 12614684)
Paul Newman won an Oscar, AND got a lifetime achievement thingy.
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 12614287)
It bothers me that he wasn't even nominated for The Conversation.
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Nobody wins the Honorary Oscar. That one is awarded. The others are won.
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by MScottM
(Post 12614893)
Nobody wins the Honorary Oscar. That one is awarded. The others are won.
|
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Originally Posted by rocket1312
(Post 12614876)
Newman won the Cecille B. DeMille award, which is a Golden Globes award. He did not win the Academy Honorary Oscar.
BTW, he was given that award the year before he won his acting Oscar for The Color of Money. The same thing happened to Henry Fonda, who won his acting Oscar for On Golden Pond a year after his honorary Oscar. I'm not sure if they are the only examples, but Gary Cooper and Elia Kazan each won two "regular" Oscars before being awarded an honorary one. A likely candidate for the near future is Glenn Close, who has been nominated 6 times but never won. |
re: Gene Hackman Appreciation Thread (1930-2025)
Huh? I guess I missed that. It didn't even occur to me that he would have gotten one 30 years ago. Still follows the formula though. Gary Cooper and Elia Kazan on the other hand...
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.