View Poll Results: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
Voters: 320. You may not vote on this poll
Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
#476
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
The moon's gravity is 1/6 of earth's gravity, and appears to be a lot further away than Pandora was to its planet, relatively speaking. At least the script addressed the difference in gravity, and the atmosphere as it pertained to human habitation on Pandora.
#477
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
#478
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#479
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
I'm just saying I didn't buy the helicopter picking up the trailer. It didn't LOOK credible.
#480
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
I loved Grace's avatar. Everytime I saw it I just thought..my god...that's so fucking real looking. And I agree on it being a 1st gen Avatar. On the 2nd viewing I totally did not notice that Jake's avatar still had the 5 fingers over the Na'vi's 4 fingered hand. Neat little detail.
#481
DVD Talk Hero
#484
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 75 clicks above the Do Lung bridge...
Posts: 18,946
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
A tank is amazingly heavy, that trailer in the film is a piece of aluminum foil by comparison. Considering those things in the film had dual turboprop setups the lifting capacity is actually well within reason.
Here's an old B&W photo of a house being carried:
#485
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,287
Received 1,805 Likes
on
1,127 Posts
#488
DVD Talk Hero
#489
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
We've had helicopters, here on boring old earth, that can pick up and transport tanks, boats, jets, APCs, etc, for decades.
A tank is amazingly heavy, that trailer in the film is a piece of aluminum foil by comparison. Considering those things in the film had dual turboprop setups the lifting capacity is actually well within reason.
Here's an old B&W photo of a house being carried:
A tank is amazingly heavy, that trailer in the film is a piece of aluminum foil by comparison. Considering those things in the film had dual turboprop setups the lifting capacity is actually well within reason.
Here's an old B&W photo of a house being carried:
#491
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 75 clicks above the Do Lung bridge...
Posts: 18,946
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
You might want to familiarize yourself with what military helicopters have been doing since the Vietnam war. You'll be surprised, and understand the point I was making a little better.
A tank weighs a lot more than a mobile home with a few pods in it.
#492
Banned by request
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
I loved Grace's avatar. Everytime I saw it I just thought..my god...that's so fucking real looking. And I agree on it being a 1st gen Avatar. On the 2nd viewing I totally did not notice that Jake's avatar still had the 5 fingers over the Na'vi's 4 fingered hand. Neat little detail.
#493
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
this was one of the worst movies I've ever seen
have people forgotten what a good movie is?
this was on the level of the garbage-fest that was 10,000 BC, awful writing, one cliche after another, full of special effects but little imagination. No sense of pace, it was just a mess. Cameron who is usually a master of action set pieces and creating space, was apparently snoozing just like his main character.
I was very critical of District 9, but compared to Avatar, it is a masterpiece.
Also, it doesnt hold a candle to DANCES WITH WOLVES-- doesn't have an ounce of that movie's heart and soul, or sense of place.
One movie I can compare it to however is 10,000 BC. Give me one reason why that is a bad movie and this is good, they are nearly the same level of crap.
Watching this movie, I was embarrassed for everyone involved. It must have been written in the 90's because in the last 10 years we have seen a hundred of these.
have people forgotten what a good movie is?
this was on the level of the garbage-fest that was 10,000 BC, awful writing, one cliche after another, full of special effects but little imagination. No sense of pace, it was just a mess. Cameron who is usually a master of action set pieces and creating space, was apparently snoozing just like his main character.
I was very critical of District 9, but compared to Avatar, it is a masterpiece.
Also, it doesnt hold a candle to DANCES WITH WOLVES-- doesn't have an ounce of that movie's heart and soul, or sense of place.
One movie I can compare it to however is 10,000 BC. Give me one reason why that is a bad movie and this is good, they are nearly the same level of crap.
Watching this movie, I was embarrassed for everyone involved. It must have been written in the 90's because in the last 10 years we have seen a hundred of these.
#494
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
In terms of personal favorites, I'd rank it 6th of the year for me, behind Up, Star Trek, Watchmen, The Hurt Locker and (500)Days of Summer. Good acting all around with a very cliche'd story that was alright in most places, but a little thin from time to time. The CGI was good, but at no point did I think 'wow, those things look real!' That applies to the Navi, the animal life and the plant life. I'd agree with those who mentioned District 9 having more realistic looking CGI integration. Pandora was pretty enough, but I expected more given the time and money put into this. In terms of story, I thought it was pretty lame they had to rely on a MacGuffin as the driving point of the plot. I had other minor gripes with the writing, but that was the most glaring. Anyway, it was entertaining enough, just not the timeless masterpiece some were expecting or others are still claiming it is.
#495
DVD Talk Hero
#497
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 7,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
Wow, this thread sounds like a Star Wars prequel thread. There are people that just didn't buy this movie, and rightfully so, and wonder what the hell everyone else is smoking (although in Dr. Mabuse's place, we do know what he was smoking while watching it).
And then you have people who continually praise this movie solely because of the visuals, despite the bad acting, despite the incredibly stupid story, despite the enormous plot holes.
Here's what's wrong with the story:
And then you have people who continually praise this movie solely because of the visuals, despite the bad acting, despite the incredibly stupid story, despite the enormous plot holes.
Here's what's wrong with the story:
Spoiler:
Last edited by Superboy; 12-27-09 at 10:48 PM.
#498
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
Wow, this thread sounds like a Star Wars prequel thread. There are people that just didn't buy this movie, and rightfully so, and wonder what the hell everyone else is smoking (although in Dr. Mabuse's place, we do know what he was smoking while watching it).
And then you have people who continually praise this movie solely because of the visuals, despite the bad acting, despite the incredibly stupid story, despite the enormous plot holes.
Here's what's wrong with the story:
And then you have people who continually praise this movie solely because of the visuals, despite the bad acting, despite the incredibly stupid story, despite the enormous plot holes.
Here's what's wrong with the story:
Personally, I don't think the acting was bad at all, nor the story stupid, so it was easy for me to enjoy the movie even though I do have my own complaints about some of the plot details.
Regarding some of your points below, I just have a few of my own personal reactions.
Spoiler:
Last edited by fumanstan; 12-27-09 at 11:19 PM.
#499
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
This thread is absolutely nothing like any of the "Star Wars" prequel threads. "Avatar" is not following a trio of beloved films. It didn't have any shoes to fill. Or anything to compare to. And the majority of the people here have given "Avatar" 4 stars or higher (out of 5). I don't recall the majority of the people in any of the "Star Wars" prequel threads loving those films. Again, I said majority.
#500
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Avatar (Cameron, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
Gravity on a moon depends solely on the mass of the moon itself. The distance between the moon and the primary planet doesn't factor into it.