![]() |
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
I agree with the bolded statement above.
I seek out smaller, more obscure movies, and I was still disappointed by a number of them. I've gotten to a point where I feel like there's only 1 or 2 really good movies a year. It's much easier for someone to say Transformers 2 is great, where I say nothing is great. The more I see, the more disappointed I become. |
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 9867677)
This paragraph bothered me the most. They're basing this notion solely on an analysis of Netflix reviews.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
But the point is that people who watch more obscure films are often less satisfied than those that watch blockbusters. If the only data point is Netflix ratings, how is that an accurate depiction, if you presume that a lot of people who watch more obscure titles don't use Netflix?
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 9867677)
This paragraph bothered me the most. They're basing this notion solely on an analysis of Netflix reviews.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
They find that blockbusters get better ratings from the people who have watched them than more obscure ones do. Even the critically loathed “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” is awarded four stars out of five. Revenge of the Fallen is rated just a shade over two stars on Netflix. And most of the posted reviews rate it one star. |
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by TimeandTide
(Post 9877432)
:hscratch:
Revenge of the Fallen is rated just a shade over two stars on Netflix. And most of the posted reviews rate it one star. http://i45.tinypic.com/34qplox.jpg It's rated 3.8/5 overall, but the 1/5 is a guess as to what I would rate it based on my other ratings. |
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 9867677)
This paragraph bothered me the most. They're basing this notion solely on an analysis of Netflix reviews. It doesn't seem to have occurred to them that maybe those of us who get the most pleasure out of the obscure films we've discovered don't even bother to go on Netflix. Netflix doesn't have the stuff I want, so why would I even go on that site to provide reviews? How do you measure the tastes and critical responses of those of us who function entirely outside of that system? I buy DVDs in Chinatown and I order others from CDJapan and YesAsia. And I even review stuff on CDJapan. But occasionally, I see Hollywood blockbusters in theaters. So I belong in that study in some way, but their criteria for research rules out any viable way of tabulating my responses to the mainstream releases I see and the obscure ones I purchase.
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 9867954)
But the point is that people who watch more obscure films are often less satisfied than those that watch blockbusters. If the only data point is Netflix ratings, how is that an accurate depiction, if you presume that a lot of people who watch more obscure titles don't use Netflix?
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 9867677)
This paragraph bothered me the most. They're basing this notion solely on an analysis of Netflix reviews. It doesn't seem to have occurred to them that maybe those of us who get the most pleasure out of the obscure films we've discovered don't even bother to go on Netflix. Netflix doesn't have the stuff I want, so why would I even go on that site to provide reviews? How do you measure the tastes and critical responses of those of us who function entirely outside of that system? I buy DVDs in Chinatown and I order others from CDJapan and YesAsia. And I even review stuff on CDJapan. But occasionally, I see Hollywood blockbusters in theaters. So I belong in that study in some way, but their criteria for research rules out any viable way of tabulating my responses to the mainstream releases I see and the obscure ones I purchase.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by clckworang
(Post 9878533)
I'm not saying Netflix should be the sole measure, but a big reason I use Netflix is because I can get more obscure titles that I wouldn't be able to get at Blockbuster or Hollywood Video, which are unfortunately the only real rental choices where I live. For that matter, not everyone lives near a Chinatown where they can go pick up imports or have easy access to them.
That said, Netflix does have a good variety of films, but whether or not it has a lot of obscure titles depends on how you define "obscure." Netflix isn't likely to have anything that wasn't released in the US by a major distributor. |
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
(Post 9867737)
... The more I see, the more disappointed I become.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Netflix has a huge amount of obscure/foreign/independent DVDs...I am surprised people can't find anything they want to rent there.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Greencine.com is much better than netflix for renting obscure stuff.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Jaymole
(Post 9881487)
Netflix has a huge amount of obscure/foreign/independent DVDs...I am surprised people can't find anything they want to rent there.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 9881579)
Agreed. It's all Region 1, so you won't find everything available in the world, but there's a ton there.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 9881691)
Most of the DVDs I watch/buy are R2 and R3.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 9881778)
European R2, or Japan R2, or both?
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
The newest theatre in Omaha has variable pricing (not in the sense that The Bus is talking about though). There are 5 screens at the theatre. There are 2 levels of seating for each screen. The lowest level (and closest to the screen) is the cheapest (at $7 for matinees, cheap is not the best word to use). The upper level is $1 more per ticket, but you have access to the food service. Waiters will bring you food on dishes and drinks in glasses. The 5th screen has 2 different levels of seating, with the lower level being the food service. The upper level is $5 more than the middle ticket, but you get a $5 food voucher to use on booze or concessions. You also get access to the "VIP" lounge w/ bar. All seats are assigned and all three levels have increasingly nicer seating.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 9881691)
Most of the DVDs I watch/buy are R2 and R3.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Nick Danger
(Post 9882209)
So you are a perfect example of the niche consumer that's mentioned in the article.
|
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by dan30oly
(Post 9866728)
Than you might as well say it's the top 20 movies since 1977.
Screw you if you care about movies before that as they don't matter. In 1939, TV was in the fetus stage of its life cycle and PCs were non-existent. The radio and phonograph were the only forms of technological entertainment in the home. Of course people would flock to their local movie theatres since the choices were so much more limited back then. I notice that in both lists, both unadjusted and adjusted, the vast majority of the top movies of all time are escapist fare, often set in different time periods with plenty of fantasy, sci-fi, animation, and otherworldy settings. The biggest movies serve as an escape from the mundane nature of our everyday lives and audiences will flock to those the most. |
Re: Ever-increasing choice and the modern blockbuster
Originally Posted by Dr Mabuse
(Post 9866704)
I see Supr done already covered that.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.