Saw VI (2009)
#27
Re: Saw VI (2009)
It's just going to continue on DTV too. Even if Lionsgate stops making money theatrically, they're probably not going to change much; just cut costs and send 'em straight to disc.
#28
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Saw VI (2009)
Definitely will be seeing this on opening night.
I still have a bad taste with the fifth film (which I saw in theaters), so I hope at the very least this film is better than it.
I still have a bad taste with the fifth film (which I saw in theaters), so I hope at the very least this film is better than it.
#30
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Saw VI (2009)
I honestly have no idea if I've seen all of these or not...I'm pretty sure I have with the lst one ending
and I don't think I'll ever know as I would never watch one of these flicks again but for whatever reason...I always rent the latest installment. Definitely not looking forward to this but as always...a rental will be done.
Spoiler:
#31
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Saw VI (2009)
I will be there opening night. I love the series, and I don't really think they have jumped the shark just yet.
#32
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Saw VI (2009)
I honestly have no idea if I've seen all of these or not...I'm pretty sure I have with the lst one ending
and I don't think I'll ever know as I would never watch one of these flicks again but for whatever reason...I always rent the latest installment. Definitely not looking forward to this but as always...a rental will be done.
Spoiler:
#33
DVD Talk God
Re: Saw VI (2009)
I've enjoyed them and look forward to VI and then VII, which was already greenlighted.
I do think the series misses Darren Lynn Bousman, James Wan and Leigh Whannell.
I can't believe Lionsgate has kept the Project Greenlight writers for 4 movies!! (IV-VII)
II was probably my favorite one and IV was probably my least favorite.
I do think the series misses Darren Lynn Bousman, James Wan and Leigh Whannell.
I can't believe Lionsgate has kept the Project Greenlight writers for 4 movies!! (IV-VII)
II was probably my favorite one and IV was probably my least favorite.
#34
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Saw VI (2009)
1 and 2 I really liked
3 I thought was still fun but the story and format started showing cracks
4 was horrible and got me to give up on the series
Never saw 5, heard mostly bad. Should I give it a chance?
3 I thought was still fun but the story and format started showing cracks
4 was horrible and got me to give up on the series
Never saw 5, heard mostly bad. Should I give it a chance?
#36
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Saw VI (2009)
I think for a horror series to still move the plot along adequately this far along is pretty darn impressive.
#38
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#40
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Somewhere out there... YES THERE!!!
Posts: 7,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Saw VI (2009)
This movie needs to die seriously. It was good at the start, but talk about beating a dead horse. That horse is bloody, beaten, and bruised. Think of the poor horses people.
#41
DVD Talk God
Re: Saw VI (2009)
You can bash them all you want, but the movies make money and the producers behind the series are smart businessmen. Not counting the 1st and 2nd movies, the budget for each movie is no more than $10M and is a money making machine for Lionsgate.
#42
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Somewhere out there... YES THERE!!!
Posts: 7,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Saw VI (2009)
I can't fault them for taking advantage of people who are willing to pay for pretty much the exact same movie every time. I would do the same in their position.
Althought I will concede that this isn't much worse than the Friday the 13th movies, Nightmare on elm street, and Halloween movies. Wasn't a huge fan of those either though.
Althought I will concede that this isn't much worse than the Friday the 13th movies, Nightmare on elm street, and Halloween movies. Wasn't a huge fan of those either though.
Last edited by glassdragon; 10-06-09 at 04:52 AM.
#44
Re: Saw VI (2009)
#45
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Somewhere out there... YES THERE!!!
Posts: 7,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Saw VI (2009)
The first and second cost less than the others, I'm not sure why you're singling them out. When I saw the original at that Q+A with Wan and Whannell, they were contractually obligated not to mention how little it cost.It's kind of condescending to assume that most people are essentially tricked into watching them. Each chapter in the Saw franchise is no more or less "the same movie" as your average sequel, and even then, this is a gross generalization, since 70% of the first Saw takes place in a single room, the second one is 50-50 on two plotlines, the third one is built around flashbacks and the fourth is focused on the chronology. The only one that doesn't introduce anything new, really, is the fifth one, and it seems to be the least-popular among fans.
#46
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Saw VI (2009)
Yes, and most sequels are not that good since they are usually just a rehash of the original. To me it is rare to see a sequel that is any good since they rarely break new ground, or have some kind of original story. I personally go to movies for the story. I don't go to movies to know what is going to happen 90 percent of it since I've seen it before with 1 "twist" at the end. Same reason I don't see M. Night Shama... Shamala... that guys movies anymore.
Of course, the other side of the audience is going just to see the different death traps, and in that case there's something new every time out.
#47
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Saw VI (2009)
I: $2 million budget, $102 million worldwide gross.
II: $4 million budget, $155 million worldwide gross.
III: $10 million budget, $165 million worldwide gross.
IV: $10 million budget, $140 million worldwide gross.
V: $10 million budget, $135 million worldwide gross.
Even when you subtract the distribution costs, just think about how much money the films have made due to video rentals and sales. Even with the franchise losing steam at a progressive rate, the films still cost cheap enough that they're guaranteed a profit no matter what.
When I saw Zombieland the other night, I heard nothing but groans from the audience when the trailer for VI played. I still think it'll have a $25 - 30 million opening weekend; but I think it'll be the lowest grossing one in the franchise (domestically at least) unless there's a substantial jump in quality to get WOM better than the very lackluster perception of the last two.
#48
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Saw VI (2009)
Looks like Part VIII is the last...
http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news...s.php?id=12305
As much as I would go for more, I would like to see it end before it gets beyond far fetched I have enjoyed 1-5 very much and hope good things with VI. VII and VIII can close it up... but who will be the last apprentice? Jill? Gordon? Santa Claus?!
http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news...s.php?id=12305
As much as I would go for more, I would like to see it end before it gets beyond far fetched I have enjoyed 1-5 very much and hope good things with VI. VII and VIII can close it up... but who will be the last apprentice? Jill? Gordon? Santa Claus?!