Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

Movie:
”Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince” (2009) (Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Michael Gambon, Alan Rickman, Jim Broadbent)

Release Date:
7/15/2009

Rating:
PG (for scary images, some violence, language and mild sensuality)

Running Time:
153 min. (2h. 33m.)

Rotten Tomatoes:
Fresh:177 Rotten:34 (84% as of 7/21/09)
RT Link...

Info:
IMDb Link...

Trailer:
<object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/NEcQ3Jdld-ftOki_glLz2g"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/NEcQ3Jdld-ftOki_glLz2g" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" width="512" height="296"></embed></object>

Poster Art:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...osters/hp2.jpg

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

What a relief! I went into Half-Blood Prince with some trepidation. Order of the Phoenix was simply one of the most dreadful movies I've seen in theaters in recent years. I didn't know if I should be laying the blame on David Yates or Michael Goldenberg. Well, this movie gives me the answer: It's Goldenberg's fault. The screenplay for Phoenix excised all the things that made Phoenix palatable.

For the newest installment, Steve Klove returns. Like all adaptations, you can't fit in everything you can from the book into a film. But Klove retains, improbably, so much of the heart of the characters from the book that the movie could almost work as a stand-alone romantic comedy. My only complaint is that the ending is cut short and the



loses some of the impact. I don't think an extra 5 or 7 minutes there would've killed the film.

Overall, this is the strongest installment of the series and a great way to go into the final two films. Of the people I saw it with it, all but one loved it (she was a first time Potter viewer). Highly recommended to fans!

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

Hmm. I dunno how to feel about that review. I never read the books but Order of the Phoenix was my second favorite movie. Prisoner of Azkabhan is my favorite thus far. The one I hated the most was Goblet Of Fire. It was just so disjointed.

How does Half-Blood Prince compare to Prisoner of Azkabhan?

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

I've never seen any of the others but Priosoner of Azkabhan was damn good...Cuaron was on a role with that one.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

I liked films 1,3, and 5.
Films 2 and 4 sucked.

I swore i'd never see another Potter in theaters after 4 but 5 was very good and I may change my mind after seeing the good reviews for this one.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

I wouldn't say Chamber of Secrets sucked but it was definitely not on par with Prisoner of Azkabhan or Order of the Phoenix.

I'd rate them from best to worst:

Prisoner of Azkabhan
Order of the Phoenix
Philosopher's Stone
Chamber of Secrets
Goblet of Fire

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

Yeah, that would be my ranking as well. Chamber of Secrets isn't bad so much as it is pointless, but so is the book, so that's not the movie's fault. Goblet of Fire was just poorly made.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

I think "Half-Blood Prince" is excellent.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

"Chamber of Secrets" was always my least favorite, but they helped redeem it in the end by making its climax retroactively important.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

Chamber of Secrets is a 1.5 hour plot in a 3 hour movie. :) That film needed a better director and a shorter runtime.

Goblet of Fire wasn't terrible but it should have been better. Maybe because it's a lot of peoples' favorite book of the series... it was impossible to measure up.

I actually thought Order of the Phoenix was one of the best of the series. Not sure why people don't like that one.

As I've told my friends though... the winner hands down is Prisoner of Azkaban. Instead of making the book into an exact replica on-screen that film made a MOVIE. Great cinematography, design, and pacing... and Cuaron knew exactly what was needed in the plot and what could go to the wayside and not hurt the film. It's TIGHT.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

Great reviews so far in here and from Brian and Jamie. I'm looking forward to it. Taking my older daughter to the 9:30am tomorrow (early bird special :up:).

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

A good point.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

ALthough you're review had already swayed me, this charming picture you included sealed the deal:

http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/image...47539034_3.jpg

:D:up:

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

I caught it this morning and I'm not sure if it was because I was tired from not getting much sleep, but I found it fairly boring. I haven't read the book since it's release, so I don't really have that to compare to but i'd say about 90% of the movie is just silly relationships going back and forth, leaving a lot to be desired. The Half-Blood Prince subplot felt like it was barely touched, and the ending seemed rushed once Harry and Dumbledore seek out the Horcrux up until the end. Quidditch seemed like it was injected just to add a little bit of action in the middle of the movie but didn't serve that much more of a purpose.

I did think they did a good job with Draco and Snape, but the other characters, like Dumbledore, Ron, and Hermonie all felt on the weak end.

Also, Tonks didn't look as cute as she did in the last movie :sad:

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

Well, that's not good. :(

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

She definitely did not. I thought it was just James Phelps in a wig at one point. :lol:

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

But it's made up by the fact that Bonnie Wright is kind of hot.

(Yes, she's 18).

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

She's not supposed to.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

This opening is going to be huge, don't know if it can break Transformers Wednesday opening record but I think it will have a good shot. Here in Socal there are a lot of theaters that have 5+ midnight showings which are all sold out.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

I counted about 20 sold out midnight shows here in Pittsburgh. However, the other recent ones were always front loaded so who knows if this will have legs.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

I'll say the same thing I said to a friend-of-a-friend on Facebook:

TF2 made $300M in 14 days. No HP has made $300M since SS.

HP won't have the weekend TF2 had. My local IMAX showed TF2 every 3 hours for 72 hours straight. They did that because Dallas was doing it and they hate each other. HP has nothing like that.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

It doesn't make it suck any less! But no, wasn't there some stuff in the book about how the return of the Death Eaters had been taking it's toll on the Order?

Still, the colorful hair was gone and she had the hair cut of a dude. She was hardly recognizable, but at least there was a brief line about her relationship with Lupin.

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

The lone decenter at RT is blaming the lag time inbetween the books and the movie and not the merits of the movie itself. :down:

I'm just pissed that it wasn't released back in Nov '08.

... but I will be seeing it in the next few days. :D:up:

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

Saw it tonight, loved it. I would've liked to have seen Snape actually lose it at the end like i feel he did in the book, but I'm just being ultra picky. Can't wait to see the next one!

Re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (D. Yates, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
 

It's the third best film of the series, behind Azkaban and Phoenix.