Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by GenPion
(Post 9656631)
This movie was very disappointing. It was a non-stop thrill ride but it lacked so much in logic that I felt like it was nothing more than a giant mess by the time the credits began to roll.
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Wikus was hilarious. He reminded me of Murray from Flight of the Conchords, mixed with a little bit of Michael Scott, while looking like Spike Jonez. :shrug:
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 9655312)
^ Those two things didn't bother me much, as it was a sci-fi film. In pretty much any such film you could pick out dozens of "how?" or "why?" issues.
Spoilers follow Spoiler:
While, those are all good questions, it doesn't bother me that they all go unanswered. In this movie, we are just thrown into the middle of things. So I expected to be a little lost. The sequel will surely expand the scope of this universe and probably answer most questions. If something in the sequel contradicts anything we've already seen, then we can officially call them plot holes. But for now, we have too little information. So we have to speculate. But I think that's part of the fun. For example: Why did the countries of the earth not have tons of military and scientist all over the ship? They arrived years ago. For all we know, the ship has already been picked clean. How did the ship stay suspended? In Star Wars terms, I think the "repulsor-lifts" still work, but they need the black stuff for the "hyperdrive." Two things really, 1) how does this black rocket fuel or whatever it is that powers the entire ship also turn humans into prawns and 2) how would Christopher know that the fluid would do that to a human which he obviously did when he first saw Wilkin's mutated arm. It appeared to me that the prawns' technology has a biological aspect to it. Like the goo you stick your hands into to control the ship or the weapons having to interface with the prawns' DNA in order to work. Maybe, the fuel is alive and interacts with the user. |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 9655130)
Saw it last night. It was very entertaining but definitely falls short of the 'masterpiece' everyone is claiming it to be. I really enjoyed the actor portraying Wikus and seeing his personality change throughout the film depending on extraneous circumstances.
Marching into MNU and taking the vial back was the biggest :wtf: moment. Also quite a bit splashed on Wikus in the beginning, how did they know there was anything left in the vial? Oh and Chistopher making a bomb to escape in literally 5 seconds with scrap pulled from a table? :lol: That whole bit was very reminiscent of the virus in ID4. Almost as preposterous, but it still held together somehow without totally going off the deep end despite sounding like it in text form. 3 1/2 out of 5 But I also realize that A) That's not the movie I wanted to see, and B) honestly, I would have tried it too. Life in D9 is no life at all. What made it credible for me is that Wikus had alien weapons and an alien genius with him (Christopher is capable of interstellar travel, afterall). Also, maybe I'm wrong but the way I remember it, Cristopher used a bomb. He didn't make it. |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
I just remembered something. Are the prawns chameleons? I remember seeing yellow stripes on some and white writing on others as if they were trying to blend into some of the signs around D9.
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
I don't think they're chameleons, more than likely those are gang colors of some sort or another. Also every prawn had an ID code from MNU on the back of their heads.
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by bunnydojo
(Post 9653548)
This is a rare case where I was okay with that kind of thing...
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Here is a FAQ that can help answer a lot of questions people are bringing up.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1136608/...flat/145381864 Spoiler:
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
I was hoping the kid would exclaim "this is UNIX!" before using the ship's computer.
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by RD1973
(Post 9657280)
Well, as they were contemplating breaking into MNU, I realized the more realistic decision would have been not to attempt it. They could have stayed in D9 eating garbage for the rest of the movie.
But I also realize that A) That's not the movie I wanted to see, and B) honestly, I would have tried it too. Life in D9 is no life at all.
Originally Posted by RD1973
(Post 9657280)
Also, maybe I'm wrong but the way I remember it, Cristopher used a bomb. He didn't make it.
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 9660164)
I was hoping the kid would exclaim "this is UNIX!" before using the ship's computer.
And while I liked the movie a lot and think Blomkamp is going to do amazing things, it's a bit odd that a huge FAQ is needed to make sense of the movie when it was so straightforward in a lot of ways (this isn't Eraserhead). |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9660246)
:lol:
And while I liked the movie a lot and think Blomkamp is going to do amazing things, it's a bit odd that a huge FAQ is needed to make sense of the movie when it was so straightforward in a lot of ways (this isn't Eraserhead). For example, the question about how the ship has hovered for 20 years. I didn't think about that at all. They made it very clear the fuel was for the small ship, I didn't think for a moment that the big ship was out of fuel too. That's like someone asking Han Solo to explain the hyperdrive before he uses it. Sure there might be an explanation (and one has been given in the non-movie materials) but it's not necessary for the story. |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
I feel bad for the guy who got his cellphone stolen. He wasn't very popular was he? The only person that called the phone was his wife and who knows how she got the number!
But really, this was my favorite movie this summer. I'm glad Halo didn't get made and I hope they don't continue with it since this was a hit. |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
I found it absurd that you have this giant MNU corporation dealing with these aliens and one walks in the front door and proceeds to just march down 12 stories to steal exactly what they need with no interruptions.
Originally Posted by project86
(Post 9660647)
I feel bad for the guy who got his cellphone stolen. He wasn't very popular was he? The only person that called the phone was his wife and who knows how she got the number!
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
caught a matinee of this today and have to say it's easily the best movie i've seen at the multiplex in a long long time...just riveting from the first frame and a ton of fun along the way. For those complaining it was illogical, I'm not sure how to respond...one of D9's overall strengths was the story in addition to the fantastic alternate reality it was set in...great story, great aliens, smart writing, awesome alien guns...what else could you ask for?
The best part is it is 10 times the movie Transformers 2, T4, or any of the other big budget fuck ups this year at a fraction of the budget. I hope hollywood pays attention to that part...a good story goes a long way. |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by superdeluxe
(Post 9639486)
Another case I am sure of doing a negative review to get attention.
eta: http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/1897/...isntinsane.jpg |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 9660202)
Not exactly what I was getting at. Getting the vial is essential, I understand that. I found it absurd that you have this giant MNU corporation dealing with these aliens and one walks in the front door and proceeds to just march down 12 stories to steal exactly what they need with no interruptions. Only until they got the vial were they conveniently attacked, cue cool escape sequence!
That may be but I'm pretty sure Christopher actually said (via subtitles) that he was going to make a bomb. He grabs the shit on the table, they run out the door and voila, instaBomb. As for the bomb, I'm pretty sure he just bundled some alien grenades together. The only eye-rolling parts were that Wikus' password to get into the different rooms still worked. And that a car with unlocked doors and the key in the ignition was waiting for them in the garage. But I let that stuff go. I've seen it so many times, I'd probably be thrown off if it didn't happen. |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9660246)
:lol:
And while I liked the movie a lot and think Blomkamp is going to do amazing things, it's a bit odd that a huge FAQ is needed to make sense of the movie when it was so straightforward in a lot of ways (this isn't Eraserhead). After reading the FAQ, I realized that pretty much all my assumptions were correct. Its all there in the movie. You just have to be paying attention. Also, do people really come up with these huge lists of potential plot-holes as they watch a movie? Unless a movie is just garbage (TF 2), I just assume this is the way it went down. Things could have been done differently. But this is the way it turned out. I don't second guess every move a character makes. It seems to me that some people go into a movie to nit-pick everything. |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9660246)
:lol:
And while I liked the movie a lot and think Blomkamp is going to do amazing things, it's a bit odd that a huge FAQ is needed to make sense of the movie when it was so straightforward in a lot of ways (this isn't Eraserhead). |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
finally saw it and really liked it. Had a lot more dramatic punch then I expected, so that came as a surprise, but the film overall was great science-fiction. Definate purchase.
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Good movie. A lot of it worked well. But there was plenty of 'glossing over' going on. A lot of build up and exposition seems like it was cut (whether or not it was ever filmed).
It's strong point was how ... matter-of-fact sci-fi ... it was. We're introduced after the fact that aliens came to earth. And most everything is just happening during regular life. There weren't mystical occurances. The aliens needed our help. Seems mostly original to me. |
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
I thought the biggest, most glaring plot hole was that the alien computer displayed english characters and numbers.
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
So question in the end
Spoiler:
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by superdeluxe
(Post 9664653)
So question in the end
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
Re: District 9 (Blomkamp, 2009) — Ex-Halo director fleshes out "Alive in Joburg"
Originally Posted by superdeluxe
(Post 9664653)
So question in the end
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.