Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
#1
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
One of my pet peeves with some sequels is that writers have to STRIP the "happily ever after" from the protagonist in order to propel the story forward.
Didn't you just hate it when:
(SPOILERS)
Rocky Balboa became poor again?
Laurie Strode didn't beat Michael Myers after all?
Elisabeth Shue dumped Ralph Macchio' s ass?
It's a sure fire way that the sequel can never be as good as the original. What d o y'all think?
Didn't you just hate it when:
(SPOILERS)
Rocky Balboa became poor again?
Laurie Strode didn't beat Michael Myers after all?
Elisabeth Shue dumped Ralph Macchio' s ass?
It's a sure fire way that the sequel can never be as good as the original. What d o y'all think?
#3
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
Luke Skywalker losing his hand in ESB.
#6
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
#7
Moderator
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
I dunno. I think it works for me. I once heard that writing a three-act narrative is basically:
Act I - Get your hero up in the tree.
Act II - Throw apples at him.
Act III - Get your hero down from the tree.
In a trilogy, the first sequel (Act II) would see the hero lose everything. Personally, I absolutely love the cliffhanger ending of Back to the Future II, as well as the final shot of The Godfather II.
The alternative is a rehash of the original. Men in Black II springs to mind.
Act I - Get your hero up in the tree.
Act II - Throw apples at him.
Act III - Get your hero down from the tree.
In a trilogy, the first sequel (Act II) would see the hero lose everything. Personally, I absolutely love the cliffhanger ending of Back to the Future II, as well as the final shot of The Godfather II.
The alternative is a rehash of the original. Men in Black II springs to mind.
#9
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
I dunno. I think it works for me. I once heard that writing a three-act narrative is basically:
Act I - Get your hero up in the tree.
Act II - Throw apples at him.
Act III - Get your hero down from the tree.
In a trilogy, the first sequel (Act II) would see the hero lose everything. Personally, I absolutely love the cliffhanger ending of Back to the Future II, as well as the final shot of The Godfather II.
The alternative is a rehash of the original. Men in Black II springs to mind.
Act I - Get your hero up in the tree.
Act II - Throw apples at him.
Act III - Get your hero down from the tree.
In a trilogy, the first sequel (Act II) would see the hero lose everything. Personally, I absolutely love the cliffhanger ending of Back to the Future II, as well as the final shot of The Godfather II.
The alternative is a rehash of the original. Men in Black II springs to mind.
Good point.
But what if there isn't an Act III in mind when ACT II is written?
#12
DVD Talk God
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
Not in the movies, but Jack Bauer.
Saves many American lives, stops kidnappings, assassinations, terrorist attacks, but is now a wanted fugitive and on the run.
Saves many American lives, stops kidnappings, assassinations, terrorist attacks, but is now a wanted fugitive and on the run.
#13
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
Friday The 13th Part II. Alice dies in the opening reel.
Ghostbusters 2. Sued by the city. Everyone thinks they're a joke. That it was a hoax. (Thank God for the Scolari brothers).
Ghostbusters 2. Sued by the city. Everyone thinks they're a joke. That it was a hoax. (Thank God for the Scolari brothers).
#14
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
That movie didn't go where it did because anyone thought it made any sort of narrative sense; it's because nobody had a damn clue what they were doing. Reading the history of Alien 3 is much more interesting than watching the film. The long summary on the movie's Wikipedia page is the short version. The whole process was such a giant fuck-up because, unlike Alien and Aliens, nobody had a clear vision for it. The attitude was less "now this is where the series should go next" and more "well the last one made money, so I guess we should throw together another one." Countless scripts were solicited, rejected, combined, and marinated in a casserole dish filled with piss, and the filming was constantly interfered with. The fact that it's even halfway watchable and coherent is sort of amazing.
#15
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
superman 2: gives up being a superhero
spider-Man 2: gives up being a superhero
dark knight rises: put hero in a hole for 2/3 of the movie
spider-Man 2: gives up being a superhero
dark knight rises: put hero in a hole for 2/3 of the movie
#16
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
That movie didn't go where it did because anyone thought it made any sort of narrative sense; it's because nobody had a damn clue what they were doing. Reading the history of Alien 3 is much more interesting than watching the film. The long summary on the movie's Wikipedia page is the short version. The whole process was such a giant fuck-up because, unlike Alien and Aliens, nobody had a clear vision for it. The attitude was less "now this is where the series should go next" and more "well the last one made money, so I guess we should throw together another one." Countless scripts were solicited, rejected, combined, and marinated in a casserole dish filled with piss, and the filming was constantly interfered with. The fact that it's even halfway watchable and coherent is sort of amazing.
Had they written it so that all 4 survivors from ALIENS come back and fight for at least some portion of the movie would've given the audience what they really wanted.
I could buy only Newt and Ripley surviving, bc so much of that core story is the mother/daughter relationship staying intact.
#17
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
And I'm not sure how people could suddenly dismiss the guys after they witnessed a giant marshmallow man appear in the city. Not sure how you forget that after 20 years, let alone a paltry five.
I think I could take "hero loses everything" over "let's use a flimsy excuse to tell the same story as the first movie all over again".
#18
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
A happy character doesn't make for very interesting storytelling. It's the conundrum that's plagued comics for years: anytime there's actual character development and progress and resolution, it has to be undone to make the story to back to status quo. So many sequels are just bigger-budgeted remakes that it's bound to be a chronic problem with movies too.
#19
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
I hated the beginning of Iron Eagle II (but give horror movie sequels a pass for similar openings).
#21
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
I could buy the "nobody cares anymore" if a long stretch of time had passed since they did anything, but 5 years? No.
And I'm not sure how people could suddenly dismiss the guys after they witnessed a giant marshmallow man appear in the city. Not sure how you forget that after 20 years, let alone a paltry five.
I think I could take "hero loses everything" over "let's use a flimsy excuse to tell the same story as the first movie all over again".
And I'm not sure how people could suddenly dismiss the guys after they witnessed a giant marshmallow man appear in the city. Not sure how you forget that after 20 years, let alone a paltry five.
I think I could take "hero loses everything" over "let's use a flimsy excuse to tell the same story as the first movie all over again".
#22
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
Although I heard that they brought him back in one of the later DTV sequels.
I suppose you could say the same for the GI Joe sequel as well.
#24
Political Exile
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: America
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#25
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Don't you just hate it when the hero loses EVERYTHING in the sequel?
Not a movie, but NYPD Blue's Andy "How many friends and family of mine are you going to kill?!" Sipowicz agrees with the OP.