Val Kilmer Insults Seka...and Everyone Else
10-11-07, 03:48 PM
#1
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Val Kilmer Insults Seka...and Everyone Else
What a jag-off. Would any of you pay this lump of gnat shit thirty smackeroos for a pic? I'd rather give my money to Val Lewton
This is from 42nd St. Pete's MySpace blog (http://www.42ndstreetpete.com/), which you should all subscribe to.
------------------
He Portrayed a Guy With a Big Dick and He turned Out to Be A real Big Dick himself
There were two big film conventions last weekend, one in Ohio, one in NJ. I was at the one in Ohio as I was hosting a Grindhouse Panel there. Lots of stories come out of these cons and you tend to ignore some because they are bullshit, but when over a dozen people tell me the same story, I would have to say its true.
It seems that fallen star, Val Kilmer was at the NJ con, ripping off the fans for autographs and photo ops. Pretty bad when you are charged $30 to take a picture with your own camera, but as long as fans "mark out" this dispicable practice will continue.
Mr. Kilmer was approched by another guest, adult film legend Seka, about having her picture taken with him. She was rudely refused by Kilmer as he supposedly said that he can't have his picture taken with a person such as yourself. The Platinum Princess reportedly ripped Kilmer a new asshole, in public.
For those who don't know, Kilmer played John Holmes, real life porn star and accessory to murder, in the film Wonderland. Kilmer, who reportedly looks like he's around 280lbs, completely disrespected Seka, who has always been a class act. Obviously his carreer is in a downhill slide as why else would he be selling autographs at a film con.
Instead of respecting the people who made him a star, he makes a nice unreported penny gouging his fans at $30 bucks a pop. Funny thing is that John Holmes was the first male superstar in porn because of having a foot long dick. Kilmer is so fat now that I doubt he even sees his dick anymore. So here, one again , life imitates art. Val played a guy with a big dick, but he was a bigger dick to his fans. Kudos to Seka for putting him in his place.
This is from 42nd St. Pete's MySpace blog (http://www.42ndstreetpete.com/), which you should all subscribe to.
------------------
He Portrayed a Guy With a Big Dick and He turned Out to Be A real Big Dick himself
There were two big film conventions last weekend, one in Ohio, one in NJ. I was at the one in Ohio as I was hosting a Grindhouse Panel there. Lots of stories come out of these cons and you tend to ignore some because they are bullshit, but when over a dozen people tell me the same story, I would have to say its true.
It seems that fallen star, Val Kilmer was at the NJ con, ripping off the fans for autographs and photo ops. Pretty bad when you are charged $30 to take a picture with your own camera, but as long as fans "mark out" this dispicable practice will continue.
Mr. Kilmer was approched by another guest, adult film legend Seka, about having her picture taken with him. She was rudely refused by Kilmer as he supposedly said that he can't have his picture taken with a person such as yourself. The Platinum Princess reportedly ripped Kilmer a new asshole, in public.
For those who don't know, Kilmer played John Holmes, real life porn star and accessory to murder, in the film Wonderland. Kilmer, who reportedly looks like he's around 280lbs, completely disrespected Seka, who has always been a class act. Obviously his carreer is in a downhill slide as why else would he be selling autographs at a film con.
Instead of respecting the people who made him a star, he makes a nice unreported penny gouging his fans at $30 bucks a pop. Funny thing is that John Holmes was the first male superstar in porn because of having a foot long dick. Kilmer is so fat now that I doubt he even sees his dick anymore. So here, one again , life imitates art. Val played a guy with a big dick, but he was a bigger dick to his fans. Kudos to Seka for putting him in his place.
10-11-07, 04:08 PM
#2
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 33,179
Received 525 Likes
on
376 Posts
If one is willing to pay for an autograph/photo at a scheduled appearance, why is the person charging considered an asshole? Have you never been to a con that didn't have has-beens charging for autographs and pictures?
And why does anyone care that he refused a photo with Seka? Maybe he understood that such a photo can be misconstrued. Other than Charlie Sheen, who besides JQP wants a pic with a porn star?
And why does anyone care that he refused a photo with Seka? Maybe he understood that such a photo can be misconstrued. Other than Charlie Sheen, who besides JQP wants a pic with a porn star?
10-11-07, 04:38 PM
#6
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vil Kilmer is looking a little hefty:
But I don't see a problem with charging fans with pictures. It cuts down on all the requests and limits it to your real fans. I wouldn't pay $30 to have my picture made with Val, but I'd pay $30 to have it made with some of my personal favorites like Morgan Freeman, Paul Giamatti, etc.
But I don't see a problem with charging fans with pictures. It cuts down on all the requests and limits it to your real fans. I wouldn't pay $30 to have my picture made with Val, but I'd pay $30 to have it made with some of my personal favorites like Morgan Freeman, Paul Giamatti, etc.
10-11-07, 05:08 PM
#9
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Janitor's closet in Kinnick Stadium
Posts: 15,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I remember at Wizard World Comicon in Chicago a few years ago Lou Ferigno was there and charged $20 to have your picture taken with him. So I stood about 10 ft away from the booth right in front of it and my friend made sure Lou was besides me in the picture before he took it. Charging that much for a photo is ridiculous. Autographs are different.
10-11-07, 05:29 PM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Salary:
At First Sight (1999) $9,000,000
The Saint (1997) $6,000,000
Batman Forever (1995) $7,000,000
this guy has nerve charging for pictures
if anything he should give fans back $7 for At First Sight
At First Sight (1999) $9,000,000
The Saint (1997) $6,000,000
Batman Forever (1995) $7,000,000
this guy has nerve charging for pictures
if anything he should give fans back $7 for At First Sight
10-11-07, 06:40 PM
#12
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,086
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
Val Kilmer ruled. If I were him I wouldn't show up to a place like that in the first place.
He should have charged $20 tops. The guy isn't like most washed-up celebs at these conventions in the sense that he doesn't need the money, most of them do.
And I'm sure Val has had enough indiscretions that a pic with a porn star wouldn't matter. Maybe he could get a little career resurgence if people think someone actually wants to fuck him anymore.
10-12-07, 01:24 AM
#14
Originally Posted by nickdawgy
Val Kilmer still rules.
He was in Deja Vu, wasn't he? That was recent.
He was in Deja Vu, wasn't he? That was recent.
10-12-07, 10:39 AM
#16
DVD Talk Hero
Yeah... I'm pretty indifferent to this.
10-12-07, 10:45 AM
#17
DVD Talk Legend
Val is awesome. That is all.
10-12-07, 11:00 AM
#18
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Illustrious State of Fugue
Posts: 6,257
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
This morning I had a homeless guy take my picture with a disposable camera that he got for free from Luckey's because he bought some canned fish at the right time. I see this guy all the time and when he gets the film developed I'm gonna ask for a print and I'll post it here. I charged him nothing, in fact I bought him a cup of coffee.
In a coup de grace of destiny, he turned me on to Naltrexone, which I am seriously considering looking into as alcoholism is degrading my quality of life to a degree I'm not happy with.
And if any porn stars want to take pictures with me I will buy them a cup of coffee as well. I can't see any negative results publicity wise. If anything Val would have gained hipster kudos for being seen with Seka.
In a coup de grace of destiny, he turned me on to Naltrexone, which I am seriously considering looking into as alcoholism is degrading my quality of life to a degree I'm not happy with.
And if any porn stars want to take pictures with me I will buy them a cup of coffee as well. I can't see any negative results publicity wise. If anything Val would have gained hipster kudos for being seen with Seka.
10-12-07, 11:05 AM
#19
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sesame Street (the apt. next to Bob's)
Posts: 20,198
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
That's weird that you're considered a dick for not wanting to pose with some 70s porn skank.
And charging for autographs and pictures at a convention is the norm.
I rate this story a feh.
And charging for autographs and pictures at a convention is the norm.
I rate this story a feh.
10-12-07, 11:08 AM
#20
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by RichC2
Yeah... I'm pretty indifferent to this.
das
10-12-07, 11:17 AM
#21
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by das Monkey
What? You can't get fired up about a third-hand story on some random blog about a has-been celebrity turning down a washed up porn star for a photograph?
das
das
10-12-07, 01:55 PM
#25
DVD Talk Legend
Val Kilmer is bucking for that role as Ron Jeremy from the look of things.
Even if I really, really like the person, I would not pay to have my picture taken with them.
Not even Johnny Depp. But then, he doesn't charge people for photos or his autograph.
Even if I really, really like the person, I would not pay to have my picture taken with them.
Not even Johnny Depp. But then, he doesn't charge people for photos or his autograph.
