DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Movie Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)
-   -   300 in IMAX vs RealD 3d?? anyone know the difference? (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/495204-300-imax-vs-reald-3d-anyone-know-difference.html)

StarFyre 03-14-07 07:35 AM

300 in IMAX vs RealD 3d?? anyone know the difference?
 
I saw monster house with 3d glasses in realD, and have seen films in imax (and superman in imax with that 3d options as well)..

just wondering, I notice Colossus in Toronto has 300 playing in all 3 -- normal, imax, and realD...

But I can't find info on the realD version online.

IS it fully 3D with glasses?

Regards,

Sanjay

RichC2 03-14-07 08:50 AM

That's the first I've heard it playing on RealD, maybe they meant DLP?

StarFyre 03-14-07 09:12 AM

I checked this morning and it says DLP..however, last week..it showed as real D.
I am sorry...my error :(

Sanjay

mmconhea 03-14-07 09:22 AM

I saw it in DLP, and since the film had a lot of grain and contrast to begin with, it probably doesn't look much better than a regular showing.

Giles 03-14-07 09:29 AM


Originally Posted by mmconhea
I saw it in DLP, and since the film had a lot of grain and contrast to begin with, it probably doesn't look much better than a regular showing.

although the 35mm prints will have cigarette burns and possible print imperfections. IMAX screens since their are no reel changes wont have cigarette burnes and will have a higher resolution (65mm). The DLP print I saw did have a haze of grain to it, but I would think that was intentional on the Director/DP's 'creative' decision.

TimeandTide 03-14-07 10:30 AM


Originally Posted by Giles
although the 35mm prints will have cigarette burns and possible print imperfections. IMAX screens since their are no reel changes wont have cigarette burnes and will have a higher resolution (65mm). The DLP print I saw did have a haze of grain to it, but I would think that was intentional on the Director/DP's 'creative' decision.

Giles, I already saw the film in a regular theater. Worth a second viewing on an IMAX screen or is there only a marginal difference?

Giles 03-14-07 10:34 AM


Originally Posted by TimeandTide
Giles, I already saw the film in a regular theater. Worth a second viewing on an IMAX screen or is there only a marginal difference?

any one want to chime in here who's seen the IMAX version - I would speculate yes, the print will look sharper and possibly less grainy. I only say this because I thought the 35mm print of 'Poseidon' I saw was terribly grainy, the HiDef conversion as seen on HBO, considerably cleaned up, looked better or equal in IMAX. I would assume the Digital Intermediate (master format) source is used for the DM-R conversion to the IMAX format.

StarFyre 03-14-07 12:24 PM

will be seeing imax on fri night :)

Sanjay

The Bus 03-14-07 12:57 PM

Odd. Poseidon looked great to me. V for Vendetta seemed a lot grainier.

BJacks 03-14-07 02:57 PM

IMAX is worth seeing not because it necessarily looks better, but because it's freaking huge with gigantic speakers (your theater may vary).

Giles 03-14-07 03:03 PM


Originally Posted by BJacks
IMAX is worth seeing not because it necessarily looks better, but because it's freaking huge with gigantic speakers (your theater may vary).

that also depends on the IMAX theatre, there are a few where they are smaller than say DC's Uptown or AMC's Tyson's Corner Screen 3 that make 1.85 aspect ratio films look massive.

IMRICKJAMES 03-14-07 05:42 PM

300 was awesome in IMAX.

In my opinion I don't think it would make that good of a movie in IMAX 3D or RealD 3D or whatever that is


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.