|
hmmm let's see, Naomi been chased by a giant ape.. birds... what's next, a big budget remake of 'Attack of the Killer Tomatoes'
|
Oh no!!! :eek:
Monsters that are scary if you can't cover your eyes until you can find a motorcycle helmet or some safety goggles. Help. I never got the first one. The scariest thing in that movie was a cigarette. They should have called it "The Guy Who Blew Up The Gas Station". I'm guessing the new one is going to have genetically engineered, bulletproof birds with poisonous beaks that fly out on strings and turn you to dust. Also they are CGI. |
Originally Posted by Kudama
I'm guessing the new one is going to have genetically engineered, bulletproof birds with poisonous beaks that fly out on strings and turn you to dust. Also they are CGI.
|
Originally Posted by Giles
hmmm let's see, Naomi been chased by a giant ape.. birds... what's next, a big budget remake of 'Attack of the Killer Tomatoes'
Watts Returns To The Water? Naomi Watts has confirmed reports that she has been offered the lead role in the remake of Steven Spielberg's 1975 blockbuster Jaws. The Island director Michael Bay's company will produce the new version of the film. Watts would play Jane Hooper, a female rendition of Matt Hooper, who was played by Richard Dreyfuss, in the original, according to moviehole.net. The script is being re-worked by Emmy award winning writer/producer David E. Kelley, whose current series, 'Boston Legal' was recently nominated for 7 Emmy awards, winning 2. Kelley's most recent movie credits include Mystery, Alaska and Lake Placid. Reports state work on the script will be begin following the completion of Kelley's latest series pilot, a US remake of the hit British TV Series 'Life on Mars'. The movie features a wealthy New England socialite who follows a potential boyfriend to a small Resort town named Amity when a series of shark attacks prompts widespread panic. I love Watts but I can't see doing a Birds remake as a good idea, at all. |
The original is far from critic proof. The attack on the kids scenes still look ridiculous. But even worse is that stupid song they sing before it starts. I think the chorus is repeated about 100 times.
:thumbsup: to the Watts rumor. |
Originally Posted by RichC2
Sharks apparently:
Kidding. (I was really bored) |
Why all the hate on the Birds? (the original)
Great piece of filmmaking - and the subtexts are classic Hitchockian. How is the ending like War of the Worlds? Spoiler:
Man that scene where Tippi gets attacked - gets me every time. |
Yes, I'm open to different points of view, but I guess I've reached my limit. People dissing on THE BIRDS? Gimme a fuckin' break. Don't vote.
|
Here's my before and after...
Before Michael Bay http://www.disobey.com/horror/movie_...oads/birds.jpg After Michael Bay http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/4240/birdspn5.jpg |
Australian actress Naomi Watts has reportedly been offered the lead role If Naomi is in this stupid movie, the birds better rip her clothes off... at least give me that. |
Put me in the boat that thinks the original is overrated. It's Hitchcock, so it still has some good scenes, but overall, the movie pales in comparison to the films he did before it.
|
Originally Posted by chanster
Why all the hate on the Birds? (the original)
Great piece of filmmaking - and the subtexts are classic Hitchockian. How is the ending like War of the Worlds? Spoiler:
Man that scene where Tippi gets attacked - gets me every time. |
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
Put me in the boat that thinks the original is overrated. It's Hitchcock, so it still has some good scenes, but overall, the movie pales in comparison to the films he did before it.
|
I just don't get all the hate for remakes. If you own a classic '67 Pontiac GTO and Pontiac comes out with the new incarnation that looks nothing like the original, it doesn't make you love your car any less. You don't have to go out and buy the new one. It's not even marketed towards you, it's for a younger crowd.
The same goes for "The Birds" or any other classic they've remade or will remake. Continue to love your classic and let the younger crowd have their remake if it's not your cup of tea. |
I like the Birds, but I wouldn't place it in the upper echelon of Hitchcock's filmography. The Birds is arguably a classic, but not because of its content, it was Hitch's approach that made it better than the simple genre flick it is.
|
bump
|
Heh, saying The Birds is a simple genre flick is like saying Moby Dick is nothing more than a fishing manual.
The remake will probably be awful, and is even more likely to be a flop (at least if they stick to the orginal audience-disconcerting plot.) And in five years it won't matter because the remake will be forgotten. How many people remember, say, the remake of The 39 Steps? |
Originally Posted by DVD King
Hitchcock put more into this film than elements of horror and suspense and composite shots of birds flying around. Like clemente said, it was his whole approach to filmmaking that made it into something interesting. What's bad about remakes is that something like Michael Bay's THE BIRDS comes out and "the younger crowd" suddenly looks at the 1963 film like it's a relic from 200 years ago and passes judgement, while only looking at what is bound to be a surface comparision. It's a small point to make but still one worth mentioning.
|
I saw something about Naomi Watts up for the lead. Is she the queen of lead female roles in remakes or something?
|
Bareit, it diminishes the respect the film deserves from the viewing audience as a whole.
|
She's the queen of my schlong, I know that much...
|
I think my thread should be merged with this one.
|
Originally Posted by Inverse
Heh, saying The Birds is a simple genre flick is like saying Moby Dick is nothing more than a fishing manual.
The remake will probably be awful, and is even more likely to be a flop (at least if they stick to the orginal audience-disconcerting plot.) And in five years it won't matter because the remake will be forgotten. How many people remember, say, the remake of The 39 Steps? I think my distaste for remakes comes from the waste of resources. They could have spent this money on something original and instead wasted it reproducing something that, in this case, was perfect the first time around. |
I think my schlong should be merged with Naomi Watts...
...okay, okay, I'll stop. :D |
Originally Posted by Filmmaker
Bareit, it diminishes the respect the film deserves from the viewing audience as a whole.
I don't mean to be snarky but this seems like the "George Lucas raped my childhood" cry when he first changed the original Star Wars. Except, in the case with The Birds or other remakes, you still have your original. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.