Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction
#51
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sesame Street (the apt. next to Bob's)
Posts: 20,195
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Sharon Stone had a bunch of small parts until B.I. hit big. After that, every movie that she's headlined has bombed. She's made a career of showing up at parties and award shows. She always was a lousy actress, but now she's really scraping the bottom with this.
#52
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only film I have ever liked her in besides BI was Total Recall. The only reason Casino isn't on my favorites list is her. I thought she brought that movie down a few notches.
#53
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Right of Atilla The Hun
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought she brought that movie down a few notches.
#54
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, i thought she was very good in Casino, she was decent in Totall Recall and a couple other films but mainly she did garbage movies after that so its tough to say. the tv trailer i saw for BI2 looked like something out of 'Hot Shots Part Deux' with the huge black box (no pun intended) over Sharons uncrossed legs..
#55
DVD Talk Legend
With the right director, Sharon can turn in a decent performance. She's just made some bad career choices by the projects she's chosen. I did enjoy her quite a bit in "The Quick and the Dead" (good film overall), "Diabolique" (guilty pleasure for sure), "Casino" (great film) and "Broken Flowers" (ditto).
#56
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by Geofferson
#59
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe Molotov
Why are they even bothering to release this in theaters? Just release the Unrated Edition DVD to begin with.
#65
DVD Talk Hero
It would have been okay if the film was about 30-45 minutes shorter, and if the leading male had any amount of fire and charisma within him, but he's such a blank, and he had so many scenes that I overheard people sighing at how stale, slow and boring the film was as it dragged on and on.
I give it 1 star, or a grade of D.
I give it 1 star, or a grade of D.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought Sharon Stone was very good in Total Recall and Casino, but that's about it. Basic Instinct gave her that five minutes of A-list fame. I think it's offensive that Sharon Stone is supposedly not hot anymore, even though she looks fantastic for 48.
#67
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S.Stone while a bad actress she was Casino and imo was the best in the film acting wise,she played the gold diggin bitch to perfection,she won Oscar for that right?or nominated at least.
#68
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where was the sex, there was practically no sex in this film? The ending was awful. I would not let michael canton-jones near any film property of mine. The film was not terrible, it was actually okay but it was not basic instinct without any sex in it. Like the jackal also directed by canton-jones, bi2 focuses on the wrong character. the jackal, bruce willis, is the interesting character not richard gere, fake irishman, once again canton-jones focuses on david morissey when we are really interested in catherine trammell, sharon stone, and the ending to both films is terrible. bi2 ending is terrible. No sex, terrible ending.
#70
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think Basic Instinct (the original) really is a modern classic. It takes Vertigo, scrambles it all up, throws in some sex, great camera work, and viola, you have a modern classic.
#71
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St. Albans, England (UK)
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with Sabre - what really lets the film down is the focus on Morrissey's character, when Stone is much more interesting. Unfortunately Morrissey is as dull as ditchwater. It wasn't too bad but nowhere near as good as the first film, very dumbed down and like a DTV sequel. The ending was crap, whereas the first film was well made and very slick and clever, considering its genre. The director and performances lifted it (Basic Instinct 1) above the norm IMO.
#72
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by grim_tales
I agree with Sabre - what really lets the film down is the focus on Morrissey's character, when Stone is much more interesting. Unfortunately Morrissey is as dull as ditchwater. It wasn't too bad but nowhere near as good as the first film, very dumbed down and like a DTV sequel. The ending was crap, whereas the first film was well made and very slick and clever, considering its genre. The director and performances lifted it (Basic Instinct 1) above the norm IMO.