The official I just saw "Dawn of the Dead" (04) remake thread!
#1
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,301
Received 889 Likes
on
752 Posts
The not-so official I just saw "Dawn of the Dead" (04) remake thread!
and i gotta say what a great movie! from the opening Cash song, throughout...Sure it doesn't really hold a candle to the original, but it has been updated very nicely for the milennium. Those that debate the running zombies..i see the point, but they really had to to make it relevant for the next generation viewer and I think it worked well.
The movie itself really had characters that you got into and felt for, sure some were typical horror cliche, like the jerk that you wanted to bite it and the hard ass that turns to good, but all in all it works and is a much much better class of horror than the junk that has been thrown out of the Hollywood pot lately...
...and when i say that i mean at least feel for the ones you are supposed to even if it is a little, rather than have the characters be mindless zombies with no emotion that you could care less about like the host of all other horror flicks that parade the stage lately and for the past years is all....none of them were rocket scientists by any means but it was just enough so you could cheer or jeer when you were supposed to...
also, wanted to mention..please do not compare this to "28 Days Later"...after seeing "28" before the original "Dawn" I clearly see that the comparisons are the other way around. The only thing that may be a consideration is the running aspect, but even then I think it is a stretch..
I think it is safe to say that this could very well stand on its own if the first had never been made at all. Some tense parts, creepy parts, gore parts (though I thought it could have used some more) and not too much in overall cheese factor. It remained true to the original, but with a nice updated feel that just worked all the way around.
The cameos are great, though some slightly unrecognizable, but if you listen carefully you'll get it.
Anyway, being fairly new to the whole Romero craze as I just watched "Night" (68) for the first time last month and "Dawn" first time last week I must say these films and subsequent genre are really quite surprisingly engaging me. These movies are really sticking with me and getting me to enjoy movies again..something I had missed for a bit. I have the Dutch 2-disc "Dawn" on the way with both cuts of the film and eagerly await that as well.
Way to go Romero and kudos to all for bringing life back to a subject that had been dead for some time!! ....pun intended.
Enjoy the remake all!!!
The movie itself really had characters that you got into and felt for, sure some were typical horror cliche, like the jerk that you wanted to bite it and the hard ass that turns to good, but all in all it works and is a much much better class of horror than the junk that has been thrown out of the Hollywood pot lately...
...and when i say that i mean at least feel for the ones you are supposed to even if it is a little, rather than have the characters be mindless zombies with no emotion that you could care less about like the host of all other horror flicks that parade the stage lately and for the past years is all....none of them were rocket scientists by any means but it was just enough so you could cheer or jeer when you were supposed to...
also, wanted to mention..please do not compare this to "28 Days Later"...after seeing "28" before the original "Dawn" I clearly see that the comparisons are the other way around. The only thing that may be a consideration is the running aspect, but even then I think it is a stretch..
I think it is safe to say that this could very well stand on its own if the first had never been made at all. Some tense parts, creepy parts, gore parts (though I thought it could have used some more) and not too much in overall cheese factor. It remained true to the original, but with a nice updated feel that just worked all the way around.
The cameos are great, though some slightly unrecognizable, but if you listen carefully you'll get it.
Anyway, being fairly new to the whole Romero craze as I just watched "Night" (68) for the first time last month and "Dawn" first time last week I must say these films and subsequent genre are really quite surprisingly engaging me. These movies are really sticking with me and getting me to enjoy movies again..something I had missed for a bit. I have the Dutch 2-disc "Dawn" on the way with both cuts of the film and eagerly await that as well.
Way to go Romero and kudos to all for bringing life back to a subject that had been dead for some time!! ....pun intended.
Enjoy the remake all!!!
Last edited by OldBoy; 03-22-04 at 03:18 PM.
#2
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Does a thread really need to be official?
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=346805
four pages long and no one seems to have a problem discussing it there..
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=346805
four pages long and no one seems to have a problem discussing it there..
#3
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I just saw it today as well. I enjoyed it a lot (I can't even remember the original since I haven't seen it since it was originally released). Really only two things bothered me:
1) Lack of gore- If I remember correctly the original had over-the-top gore, it was almost comical. This one was very tame in that respect.
2) Cheap scare tactics- The first half hour seemed to have about a dozen loud bangs or noises that I supposed were meant to make you jump out of your seat, they just overdid it a bit.
Great movie though!
1) Lack of gore- If I remember correctly the original had over-the-top gore, it was almost comical. This one was very tame in that respect.
2) Cheap scare tactics- The first half hour seemed to have about a dozen loud bangs or noises that I supposed were meant to make you jump out of your seat, they just overdid it a bit.
Great movie though!
#4
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
Does a thread really need to be official?
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=346805
four pages long and no one seems to have a problem discussing it there..
Does a thread really need to be official?
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=346805
four pages long and no one seems to have a problem discussing it there..
#5
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
You know, it wasn't even cause I started it why I made the comment. I just assumed that everyone took the phrase "My take" to be there own take on the film. silly rabbits!
#7
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Here is my review I posted on another forum when someone asked peoples opinions on it....
Well I just got back from seeing it & was blown away. At the moment,I would rate it a ****. Since I was totally taken by surprise with this thing.
The opening & ending credit sequences(be sure to stay through the entire end credits!) are just excellent & the coolest thing in recent memory. The opening even has Johnny Cash playing,which is kick ass & fits the apocalypic mood of what is being shown.
One word can describe the tone of the film. Bleak! Bleak Bleak!
I was surprised to see such a dark themed horror film from a major studio of all places.
Yes there is some dark humor in the film,but is it nowhere nearly as 'kick ass hilarious popcorn entertainment' as I originally thought,after previewing the opening on USA earlier in the week.
The tone is pretty serious throughout,though not without some laughs...but it never becomes an all out comedy. Another plus for the film.
Add in the fact that the camera work is more docudrama & not Micheal Bayish(as those who call it an "MTV" film claim)
Also it does spend a good majority on the charecters & less on the action. Another surprise. Sure there are some spurts of action,but it was pretty restrained for the most part. Which also surprised me,since people said it was all action,little else.
No it does not have all the social political undertones of the original. Yet that did not hurt the film for myself.
In fact,it is a completely different film from the original. So don't compare the two. This is in the same league as the remakes of Invasion of the Body Snatchers,The Thing,The Fly & The Blob. ie-takes the original source material & does it's own spin on it.
Of course if you are dead set against hating the film & all remakes in general. This film is not for you,if you can't separate the two & view with a clear open mind.
So while I may have enjoyed it,you may not. So view it at your own risk
I will say this though,it is FAR better than the TCM remake. That film was desent until the last half,where it fell off the deep end in my opinion & rates a **1/2.
Meanwhile 'Dawn..',I felt was great all the way through from the begining all the way to the final credit roll!
ps-can't wait for the unrated version which should be even more gruesome!!!
Well I just got back from seeing it & was blown away. At the moment,I would rate it a ****. Since I was totally taken by surprise with this thing.
The opening & ending credit sequences(be sure to stay through the entire end credits!) are just excellent & the coolest thing in recent memory. The opening even has Johnny Cash playing,which is kick ass & fits the apocalypic mood of what is being shown.
One word can describe the tone of the film. Bleak! Bleak Bleak!
I was surprised to see such a dark themed horror film from a major studio of all places.
Yes there is some dark humor in the film,but is it nowhere nearly as 'kick ass hilarious popcorn entertainment' as I originally thought,after previewing the opening on USA earlier in the week.
The tone is pretty serious throughout,though not without some laughs...but it never becomes an all out comedy. Another plus for the film.
Add in the fact that the camera work is more docudrama & not Micheal Bayish(as those who call it an "MTV" film claim)
Also it does spend a good majority on the charecters & less on the action. Another surprise. Sure there are some spurts of action,but it was pretty restrained for the most part. Which also surprised me,since people said it was all action,little else.
No it does not have all the social political undertones of the original. Yet that did not hurt the film for myself.
In fact,it is a completely different film from the original. So don't compare the two. This is in the same league as the remakes of Invasion of the Body Snatchers,The Thing,The Fly & The Blob. ie-takes the original source material & does it's own spin on it.
Of course if you are dead set against hating the film & all remakes in general. This film is not for you,if you can't separate the two & view with a clear open mind.
So while I may have enjoyed it,you may not. So view it at your own risk
I will say this though,it is FAR better than the TCM remake. That film was desent until the last half,where it fell off the deep end in my opinion & rates a **1/2.
Meanwhile 'Dawn..',I felt was great all the way through from the begining all the way to the final credit roll!
ps-can't wait for the unrated version which should be even more gruesome!!!
#9
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by The Cow
Saw it tonight and give it a
Amazing how many people left before the credits were over.
Saw it tonight and give it a
Amazing how many people left before the credits were over.
#10
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Yep...the majority of the theater was leaving as well..though I heard a few guys yelling "Wa..did you see that?" "Whats that doing there?",so they started watching..then kept getting pissed at the back & forth from the credits to the footage(which I loved!).
Meanwhile about 10 other people stood in the aisles to view the entire credit sequence..& seemed glad they stayed.
But as for the rest of the impatient idiots who got up & left right when "Directed By" came onscreen + kept leaving despite seeing bits of the footage. They missed out big time,great ending
So anyone seeing this film,to get the ENTIRE film,you MUST sit through ALL of the credits. Don't worry,it's not like it's 20 minutes long. Trust me,it is worth it!
Meanwhile about 10 other people stood in the aisles to view the entire credit sequence..& seemed glad they stayed.
But as for the rest of the impatient idiots who got up & left right when "Directed By" came onscreen + kept leaving despite seeing bits of the footage. They missed out big time,great ending
So anyone seeing this film,to get the ENTIRE film,you MUST sit through ALL of the credits. Don't worry,it's not like it's 20 minutes long. Trust me,it is worth it!
#11
DVD Talk Special Edition
Big time loved this movie, engrossing and suspenseful through most of it, decent amount of gore (though not over the top), and plenty of scary moments. Definately recommended!
#12
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I posted this in the other thread, so for those of you not looking over there:
What a awesome movie this was! Granted it wasn't as good as the original but i had an idea it wasn't going to be anyway.
First of all, here are some things i didnt like. I feel that besides it being set at a mall and the fact that its about zombies, there really isnt anything else it had in common with the original. There were hardly any parts in the film where i had that feeling as if i wanted to say to myself, "Oh, i remember that part from the original!" Also, none of the characters resembled any of those in the original either. Like others i really wasnt to crazy about the fast moving zombies neither. They were a bit to athletic and made me feel almost hopeless for the cast of characters. I like the slow moving zombies, they add more eerie suspense and if you get caught by those slow moving mo-fos, then its all your fault man!
Now, with that said, everything else was great! Yeah the zombies were too fast, but them bad boys were ugly and vicious and everytime one of them things went down with a shot to the head i couldnt help but jump for joy, it was awesome! The cast of characters while not too well defined were pretty cool, CJ and Ving Rhames charcter were by far my favorite and all around bad-asses.
Yeah, the comedy relief in the movie was great i think. The Metrosexual dude had some great one-liners and so did most of the cast,
It was more gory than i expected, i thought it was gonna hold back alot but was pleasantly surprised with what they had.
Overall, it was a great flick, ill be seeing it again Sunday!
What a awesome movie this was! Granted it wasn't as good as the original but i had an idea it wasn't going to be anyway.
First of all, here are some things i didnt like. I feel that besides it being set at a mall and the fact that its about zombies, there really isnt anything else it had in common with the original. There were hardly any parts in the film where i had that feeling as if i wanted to say to myself, "Oh, i remember that part from the original!" Also, none of the characters resembled any of those in the original either. Like others i really wasnt to crazy about the fast moving zombies neither. They were a bit to athletic and made me feel almost hopeless for the cast of characters. I like the slow moving zombies, they add more eerie suspense and if you get caught by those slow moving mo-fos, then its all your fault man!
Now, with that said, everything else was great! Yeah the zombies were too fast, but them bad boys were ugly and vicious and everytime one of them things went down with a shot to the head i couldnt help but jump for joy, it was awesome! The cast of characters while not too well defined were pretty cool, CJ and Ving Rhames charcter were by far my favorite and all around bad-asses.
Spoiler:
Yeah, the comedy relief in the movie was great i think. The Metrosexual dude had some great one-liners and so did most of the cast,
Spoiler:
It was more gory than i expected, i thought it was gonna hold back alot but was pleasantly surprised with what they had.
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Overall, it was a great flick, ill be seeing it again Sunday!
Last edited by thegame370; 03-20-04 at 12:05 AM.
#13
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,301
Received 889 Likes
on
752 Posts
good question
i was wondering that myself....
ps) jackskelton...i didn't mean to dis your post at all..i just did this as sometimes it is intimidating when a thread gets so long, so just in case for the peeps who just saw the movie opening weekend, this was for them and me..no disrespect intended whatsoever!!
Spoiler:
ps) jackskelton...i didn't mean to dis your post at all..i just did this as sometimes it is intimidating when a thread gets so long, so just in case for the peeps who just saw the movie opening weekend, this was for them and me..no disrespect intended whatsoever!!
Last edited by OldBoy; 03-20-04 at 12:21 AM.
#16
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Tuan Jim
Because it was needed for the plot ;p
Because it was needed for the plot ;p
#17
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The dog some how survived the parking structure even though there were zombies stuck in there. So it's safe to assume that the film subscribes to the theory that zombies don't attack animals.
#18
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
The dog some how survived the parking structure even though there were zombies stuck in there. So it's safe to assume that the film subscribes to the theory that zombies don't attack animals.
The dog some how survived the parking structure even though there were zombies stuck in there. So it's safe to assume that the film subscribes to the theory that zombies don't attack animals.
#19
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Zombies perfer and can tell the difference between human and animal flesh.. uh.. yeah, that's the only thing I can actually come up with.
#20
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i was wondering about the dog as well. really the bothered me much more then the slow vs fast zombies.
it did serve the plot but thinking about it, from the film makers eyes, if animals weren't immune, it opens up a HUGE can of worms. then of course there are super natural reasons, which are up to the viewer for pretty much all zombie films and that is, is it god's curse, alien manipulation, or a virus.
and i have a question of my own. during the Cash song they show tons of "real" (some might of been done for the film, i don't know for sure) footage. it all fit very well with the song and with the image of mankind being very violent. that is how i thought of it on my first veiwing. however seeing it again today i wondered if the footage is merely there to act as proof that zombies are everywhere in the world and are causing serious problems. i guess it is kind of up in the air but i'd like to hear others explanations for it. what service did you think that footage provided?
it did serve the plot but thinking about it, from the film makers eyes, if animals weren't immune, it opens up a HUGE can of worms. then of course there are super natural reasons, which are up to the viewer for pretty much all zombie films and that is, is it god's curse, alien manipulation, or a virus.
and i have a question of my own. during the Cash song they show tons of "real" (some might of been done for the film, i don't know for sure) footage. it all fit very well with the song and with the image of mankind being very violent. that is how i thought of it on my first veiwing. however seeing it again today i wondered if the footage is merely there to act as proof that zombies are everywhere in the world and are causing serious problems. i guess it is kind of up in the air but i'd like to hear others explanations for it. what service did you think that footage provided?
#21
Banned by request
Originally posted by Venom
and i have a question of my own. during the Cash song they show tons of "real" (some might of been done for the film, i don't know for sure) footage. it all fit very well with the song and with the image of mankind being very violent. that is how i thought of it on my first veiwing. however seeing it again today i wondered if the footage is merely there to act as proof that zombies are everywhere in the world and are causing serious problems. i guess it is kind of up in the air but i'd like to hear others explanations for it. what service did you think that footage provided?
and i have a question of my own. during the Cash song they show tons of "real" (some might of been done for the film, i don't know for sure) footage. it all fit very well with the song and with the image of mankind being very violent. that is how i thought of it on my first veiwing. however seeing it again today i wondered if the footage is merely there to act as proof that zombies are everywhere in the world and are causing serious problems. i guess it is kind of up in the air but i'd like to hear others explanations for it. what service did you think that footage provided?
#22
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Suprmallet
I think it was done to show the general immediate breakdown of the society, and also to show how quickly the zombies can take over.
I think it was done to show the general immediate breakdown of the society, and also to show how quickly the zombies can take over.
#23
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yeah, it was put in the focus that those events were happening because of the quick spread of the infection.
Thing that I would nit pick. You have to be infected in order to turn, thus those who died of natural causes don't turn? blah. I was under the belief that no matter what.. the dead rose. So once you turned you should put a round in the head just to be sure.
Thing that I would nit pick. You have to be infected in order to turn, thus those who died of natural causes don't turn? blah. I was under the belief that no matter what.. the dead rose. So once you turned you should put a round in the head just to be sure.
#24
Banned by request
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
Thing that I would nit pick. You have to be infected in order to turn, thus those who died of natural causes don't turn? blah. I was under the belief that no matter what.. the dead rose. So once you turned you should put a round in the head just to be sure.
Thing that I would nit pick. You have to be infected in order to turn, thus those who died of natural causes don't turn? blah. I was under the belief that no matter what.. the dead rose. So once you turned you should put a round in the head just to be sure.
#25
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jackskeleton
Yeah, it was put in the focus that those events were happening because of the quick spread of the infection.
Thing that I would nit pick. You have to be infected in order to turn, thus those who died of natural causes don't turn? blah. I was under the belief that no matter what.. the dead rose. So once you turned you should put a round in the head just to be sure.
Yeah, it was put in the focus that those events were happening because of the quick spread of the infection.
Thing that I would nit pick. You have to be infected in order to turn, thus those who died of natural causes don't turn? blah. I was under the belief that no matter what.. the dead rose. So once you turned you should put a round in the head just to be sure.