TO: ScandalUMD
Remember... If all else fails, you can always "Blame Canada".
|
Re: TO: ScandalUMD
Originally posted by baracine Remember... If all else fails, you can always "Blame Canada". |
Your words are too big...
I think I'll go watch Resevoir Dogs and laugh at the ear-cutting scene! Woo! |
Re: Re: TO: ScandalUMD
Originally posted by Groucho This from somebody who has just blamed Hollywood, Quentin Tarantino, and the United States for the rest of the world's problems. |
Re: The Mummy Returns: a post-Kill Bill Vol.1 reappraisal
Originally posted by baracine ...The Mummy Returns’s plot, despite frequent complaints to the contrary from various sources, is too convoluted for my tiny brain pan... Thanks! |
Ebert is about as consistent as an irregular bowel movement. This is the same dingbat who gave Tomb Raider 2 a 3 star rating based solely on the strength of his fascination with Angelina Jolie.Then he made the excuse for his dumb review that you have to go into a movie like TR2 with your brain turned off and overlook gaping plot holes. I wonder why he never makes that excuse for other movies of the type. I would have been more impressed had he just came out and said he's got the hots for Jolie, and that's why I'm giving it a positive review.
So don't base anything on Ebert. He's taken a nosedive since Siskel died. As for the movies at hand, I enjoyed Mummy Returns for what it was, a mindless action film. As for Tarantino, he's only ever made one film I like. Pulp Fiction. The rest are nothing more than superficial fluff. I haven't seen Kill Bill, so I can't comment. |
The original creator of this thread should be banned.
|
Originally posted by scroll2b The original creator of this thread should be banned. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.