![]() |
Fear dot com
does this movie suck?
thanks |
Not a very good movie in my opinion but I did find it to have a very creepy feel to it. The "doctor" was very disturbing.
|
I have a three word review for this film:
Crap dot com the film is awful. stay far far away |
it could've been a whole lot better movie...
the actres sucks ass really bad! i can't understand a single words she said... very bad accent the suspense was good for the opening scenes... but then it goes down hill ending wasn't really interesting.... generic CGI horror movie... so, you decide your own expectation. just like 13ghosts... good for 1/2 movie then goes down hill hope it helps |
As of right now, this movie ranks as #1, of the worste movies I've ever seen in my life. It is a horrible, pointless, mess of an excuse for a movie.
|
I liked it. It is somewhat disturbeing. Tho, it's not a must own movie. Much more like a rental if you have to see it.
|
I'm with the people who think this movie is horrible.
Instead of watching this movie, go to *********** or something. You'll save time and money, but will be getting the same product. Definitely one of the worst movies I've ever seen. |
I liked it
|
I still refuse to see this movie due to their incredibly annoying ad campaign on this site.
|
Originally posted by johnglass I still refuse to see this movie due to their incredibly annoying ad campaign on this site. |
I didn't think the movie was that bad, it kept me interested for the entire movie. If you really want to see a good movie rent "The Ring"
|
Don't you mean rent 'Ringu' ? Not the butchered, Americanized piece ole' crap called 'The Ring'....
I thought Fear Dot Com and The Ring was almost equal on the sucking scale.. I loved 'Ringu' though. Just my two cents. ;) |
It takes a lot for me to dislike a movie. Having said that, this movie sucked. Maybe if Natasha had gotten nekkid it would've had some redeeming value, but no go.
|
Re: Fear dot com
Originally posted by Cornholio does this movie suck? Originally posted by Cornholio thanks |
Originally posted by johnglass I still refuse to see this movie due to their incredibly annoying ad campaign on this site. |
I haven't seen it, but here is an excerpt from Ebert's 2-star review of the film:
This is a movie that cannot be taken seriously on the narrative level. But look at it. Just look at it. Wear some of those Bose sound-defeating earphones into the theater, or turn off the sound when you watch the DVD. If the final 20 minutes had been produced by a German impressionist in the 1920s, we'd be calling it a masterpiece. All credit to director William Malone, cinematographer Christian Sebaldt, production designer Jerome Latour and art directors Regime Freise and Markus Wollersheim. Now. Do I recommend the film? Not for the majority of filmgoers, who will listen to the dialogue, and will expect a plot, and will be angered by the film's sins against logic (I do not even mention credibility). But if you have read this far because you are intrigued, because you can understand the kind of paradox I am describing, then you might very well enjoy "feardotcom." I give the total movie two stars, but there are some four-star elements that deserve a better movie. You have to know how to look for them, but they're there. |
Yeah, that's the review that made me see it. He should have warned me about the smut scenes. That would of turned me off pretty quickly.
|
Definately the worst horror movie I've seen in the last 12 months.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.