Matrix Reloaded beats Spiderman at boxoffice
#1
Suspended
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Matrix Reloaded beats Spiderman at boxoffice
Recent news have indicated that Matrix Reloaded has beaten Spiderman in making the most money in a week.. about $6 million dollars more... Whoohoo!
#3
Suspended
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea I just saw Spiderman on HBO last week and have to say it sucked compared to TMR. I thought it was juvenile and had cheezey effects. I honestly don't understand how it made to much money. I Matrix movies are repeat viewing material all the way.
#8
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny how so many people looooved Spider-Man yet never complained about how FAKE he looked in his CG form, yet people whine and bitch about how TMR CG sucked because some agents looked fake.
I can't understand how a few fake looking agents out of a hundred can take you out of a movie, but at the same time a fake looking Spider-Man (the main character) is negligible.
I can't understand how a few fake looking agents out of a hundred can take you out of a movie, but at the same time a fake looking Spider-Man (the main character) is negligible.
#10
Banned
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: The City of Roses.
Posts: 4,802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by spankyj
It's nice to see a decent movie overtake the utter-trash that was Spiderman.
It's nice to see a decent movie overtake the utter-trash that was Spiderman.
#13
I don't think there's a chance in a hell that MR will touch Spiderman's $400 mil, but it is indeed quite a feat to be compared, especially with the R-rating (which is supposed to be the kiss-of-death for box office success).
#14
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally posted by Crack 6K
Funny how so many people looooved Spider-Man yet never complained about how FAKE he looked in his CG form, yet people whine and bitch about how TMR CG sucked because some agents looked fake.
I can't understand how a few fake looking agents out of a hundred can take you out of a movie, but at the same time a fake looking Spider-Man (the main character) is negligible.
Funny how so many people looooved Spider-Man yet never complained about how FAKE he looked in his CG form, yet people whine and bitch about how TMR CG sucked because some agents looked fake.
I can't understand how a few fake looking agents out of a hundred can take you out of a movie, but at the same time a fake looking Spider-Man (the main character) is negligible.
#16
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Patman
Keanu Reeves is rich! Supposedly he's getting 15% of the gate (for giving up a lot of his upfront salary).
Keanu Reeves is rich! Supposedly he's getting 15% of the gate (for giving up a lot of his upfront salary).
Yea I hear that as well and posted it last week. What I head was 15 million a movie plus 15% of the gross. Not a bad years work.
#17
DVD Talk Hero
I think Keanu had to give up his $30 million salary (or most of it to get the special effects done), but with the 15% take, he could easily pull in $25 million for the first sequel alone.