Has Daniel Radcliffe outgrown Harry Potter?
05-16-03, 01:33 PM
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Spooky
Besides, if 20-somethings can play high school students on TV, I see no reason why a 20-something Radcliffe couldn't play a 17 year old Potter - even if they don't get around to the last one until he's 24 (which is TEN years from now!).
Besides, if 20-somethings can play high school students on TV, I see no reason why a 20-something Radcliffe couldn't play a 17 year old Potter - even if they don't get around to the last one until he's 24 (which is TEN years from now!).
05-20-03, 02:59 PM
#28
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 34,089
Received 723 Likes
on
528 Posts
Originally posted by juiio
Depends how long it takes them to come out. If he's 20 and playing a 14 year old, then no. If he's 20 and playing a 17 year old, then sure.
Depends how long it takes them to come out. If he's 20 and playing a 14 year old, then no. If he's 20 and playing a 17 year old, then sure.
Karate Kid 1,2,3 took place within in a year. Daniel was 17/18.
Ralph was 23 in the first, 25 in the second and 29 in the third.
05-20-03, 03:05 PM
#29
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by andyh
It's not about age, people.
The boy Radcliffe could play the lead in Harry Potter 27: The Turd-Master of Underpant City ...
.. he'll still be an awful actor.
It's not about age, people.
The boy Radcliffe could play the lead in Harry Potter 27: The Turd-Master of Underpant City ...
.. he'll still be an awful actor.
If Dan's up to it, I don't see why they'd get someone else.
