DVD Talk Forum - Has Daniel Radcliffe outgrown Harry Potter?

Page 2 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)

- Movie Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)

- - Has Daniel Radcliffe outgrown Harry Potter? (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/292448-has-daniel-radcliffe-outgrown-harry-potter.html)

nice_skis

05-16-03 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spooky
Besides, if 20-somethings can play high school students on TV, I see no reason why a 20-something Radcliffe couldn't play a 17 year old Potter - even if they don't get around to the last one until he's 24 (which is TEN years from now!).

That is unless he decides to grow a moustache. I can't get myself to see Harry with a moustache. It would look terrible.

andyh

05-20-03 12:08 PM

It's not about age, people.

The boy Radcliffe could play the lead in Harry Potter 27: The Turd-Master of Underpant City ...

.. he'll still be an awful actor.

devilshalo

05-20-03 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by juiio
Depends how long it takes them to come out. If he's 20 and playing a 14 year old, then no. If he's 20 and playing a 17 year old, then sure.

Tell that to Ralph Macchio who made a living playing roles years younger than his real age.

Karate Kid 1,2,3 took place within in a year. Daniel was 17/18.

Ralph was 23 in the first, 25 in the second and 29 in the third.

Kal-El

05-20-03 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by andyh
It's not about age, people.

The boy Radcliffe could play the lead in Harry Potter 27: The Turd-Master of Underpant City ...

.. he'll still be an awful actor.

Thanks for the :crap:
:rolleyes:
If Dan's up to it, I don't see why they'd get someone else.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.

Page 2 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page