Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Todd Solondz's 'Storytelling'... What's he trying to say?

Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Todd Solondz's 'Storytelling'... What's he trying to say?

Old 01-29-03, 01:48 AM
  #1  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
 
CKMorpheus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Todd Solondz's 'Storytelling'... What's he trying to say?

I just saw this film and I'm really trying to make sense of it. How does the 'Fiction' story relate in any way to the 'Nonfiction' story? And what is the idea of this film in the end anyway? I loved the film, it was hilarious, but I fail to see the point. I love Todd's other films, but this one has me totally stumped.
Old 01-29-03, 05:17 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Fascination Street
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think of what the professor character says at the end of the 'Fiction' section. Then think of what the character Paul Giamatti portrays does with the 'real' family in the second part. Also, notice how stereotypes are dealt with.

Maybe there is no 'point.'
Old 01-29-03, 09:30 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget the title, Storytelling.

Its about the ethics of storytelling. The second part is more easily understood if you've seen American Movie. If we are laughing at a documentary of a real person are we hurting that person?

You could argue that the movie makes a serious 'point,' but possibly at the expense of entertainment.

I enjoyed it a great deal.
Old 03-18-05, 10:06 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,433
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
To resurrect this thread...

Happened to rent Storytelling last night and it seems like a lot of what I heard back when it came out missed what I took from it. To me, it was pointing out that stereotypes and cliches exist in real life and people all the time, but that if we focus solely on these aspects, we miss something bigger.

The two stories in the 'fiction' segment of the film are derided as being cliched and trite, yet they were both truthful accounts of events (within the movie of course). In the 'non-fiction' segment, the documentarian focuses on the stereotypical aspects of the family and misses larger aspects of what's going on. There were certainly other things going on in the film, but I thought it was primarily about reconsidering some of our notions regarding the relationship between fiction and real life.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.