![]() |
Matrix Reloaded article (some MAJOR SPOILERS)
The climax of “Reloaded”
Spoiler:
Four years ago “The Matrix” arrived out of nowhere and grossed $171 million in the United States alone—terrific for an R-rated film. But it accelerated into a phenomenon thanks to DVD, becoming the format’s first title to sell a million copies. Fans watch it again and again, each time discovering cool new bits, like how the phone conversation that opens the film foreshadows a key betrayal and how scenes inside the Matrix have a green tinge while scenes in the “real world” are blue. (Sorry, geeked out there for a second...) Critics, meanwhile, lauded writer-directors Larry and Andy Wachowski for bringing an elegance and choreography to American action films that had been missing since the days of Sam Peckinpah. On a basic level, though, “The Matrix” was simply good storytelling. And now to add more flame to the previous article in the other thread: “I’ve heard the ‘Star Wars’ people boast about shooting frames that are 97 percent digital, and lo and behold, the movies are soulless,” says John Gaeta, visual-effects supervisor for all three “Matrix” movies. “They traded the whole idea of depth in filmmaking for this supertechnological hype. It helped us focus our own philosophy: the story drives everything.” Wow. That's 2 movies referenced in one article by 2 people who worked on the films. What do you guys think? Are they still just hyping this or what? BTW, full article here I wouldn't read past the "Related article" bit though as it says they reveal the plot or most of it. They warn you before you get to that part anyway. |
Repost. Search.
|
This movie has been ridiculously hyped. I'm quite sick of it.
|
Originally posted by fumanstan Repost. Search. Anyway, if I am mistaken and I missed another thread about this, I apologize. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.