![]() |
Re: Have You Seen Citizen Kane???
Originally posted by kian69 And if it's that good why didn't it win an oscar for best picture then? It's all about popularity - and Kane was anything but popular. |
Re: Re: Have You Seen Citizen Kane???
Originally posted by El-Kabong That last bit is eays - the oscars are not an indicator of quality. Case in point: Titanic, an ok flick - but hardly worth 14 oscars. And Matrix over Star Wars for best special effects? I'd like some of what the academy was smoking that year. It's all about popularity - and Kane was anything but popular. And for the record, The Matrix deserved every single one of them IMO. |
This is a spurious argument. The Oscars are hardly an objective, consistant standard to judge anything by.
Lucy:"Beethoven wasn't so great." Schroeder:"What do you mean Beethoven wasn't so great?!" Lucy:"He didn't have his face on a bubblegum card." |
Originally posted by kian69 Hmmmm interesting since your contradicting yourself here. Wouldn't you agree that Star Wars (any one of them) is a far more popular movie than The Matrix. Following your logic Star Wars should have gotten some recognition and at least won one of the Oscars that they were competing against with The Matrix. And for the record, The Matrix deserved every single one of them IMO. And, for the record, Star Wars had the better SFX. |
Originally posted by Suprmallet Speaking of living under a rock...did you not notice the backlash against Episode I? The Matrix is far more popular than The Phantom Menace. And, for the record, Star Wars had the better SFX. I was referring to the box office success, like his Titanic example (most of the time the amount made $$$ has a direct correlation with popularity). And as for the "which one has the best effects" well I've discussed this about a hundred times in several other threads and quite frankly don't see the relevance of talking about it again, especially in a thread that has nothing to do with it. So I'll keep it to: To each his own. |
Originally posted by kian69 First of all, no I'm not living under a rock but thanks for asking :rolleyes: I was referring to the box office success, like his Titanic example (most of the time the amount made $$$ has a direct correlation with popularity). And as for the "which one has the best effects" well I've discussed this about a hundred times in several other threads and quite frankly don't see the relevance of talking about it again, especially in a thread that has nothing to do with it. So I'll keep it to: To each his own. My bad, honestly. I think in this case the box office was not a correct indicator of popularity. Citizen Kane is better than both, anyway. |
In any regard, Citizen Kane is a must-have for any serious film fan. The 2-disc set from Warner is a really good package.
|
It's likely I've seen Citizen Kane more than any other movie. To quote an old friend, "Citizen Kane may not be the best movie ever made, but I've never seen a movie that's better."
|
Did no one watch the documentary?
The reason that Citizen Kane didn't win the oscar is because of Hearst. He threatened to print all of Hollywood's dirty little secrets that he had been covering up until then in his papers, sicked the FBI on Welles, engaged in a smear campaign, etc... It's a great movie, it's too bad Hearst destroyed Welles, i've really liked him in both Kane and The Third Man. |
has any one not seen this movie that will be watching tonight?
|
Originally posted by Rypro 525 has any one not seen this movie that will be watching tonight? |
Saw it but really have no desire to watch it again.......
|
Originally posted by Mourn Did no one watch the documentary? The reason that Citizen Kane didn't win the oscar is because of Hearst. He threatened to print all of Hollywood's dirty little secrets that he had been covering up until then in his papers, sicked the FBI on Welles, engaged in a smear campaign, etc... It's a great movie, it's too bad Hearst destroyed Welles, i've really liked him in both Kane and The Third Man. IIRC, it wasn't until the mid-50's that the original cut of Kane was discovered, and immediately considered the greatest movie ever made. |
Citizen Kane was never cut for its first release in 1941 and was never recut for its re-release in 1951. The problem with its 1941 release was not that it was cut, but that it was supressed. It had its premiere on the East Coast and West Coast, then played in maybe a half dozen theaters and that was it. It would be similar to the way contemporary studios today dump films like Crash with no publicity and minimal distribution.
|
I'm watching Citizen Kane for the first time right now.
|
Originally posted by btornado I'm watching Citizen Kane for the first time right now. |
I haven't seen Citizen Kane and don't plan on it.It just doesn't interest me.
|
Woah, that was quite a bump!
I have never seen it either. I am sure it's a very good movie, and I may catch it some time, but it's not on my top ten must see movies at the moment. |
Thank you for that update. And now back to our regular programming.
|
Originally posted by calhoun07 Woah, that was quite a bump! |
Just curious, what would possess you to revive a 4 month dead thread just to say that? Me, I'd go "meh" and move on.
|
Originally posted by caligulathegod Just curious, what would possess you to revive a 4 month dead thread just to say that? Me, I'd go "meh" and move on. But since your curious i was actually searching for something else and came across this so i decided what the hell and went ahead and posted. |
Originally posted by k-qwick :crap: |
DOWN WITH PAN AND SCAM!@
|
Originally posted by pixyboi DOWN WITH PAN AND SCAM!@ especially since this film was made in 1941 and has an OAR of 1.37 : 1. So if you are waiting for the anamorphic widescreen of this one you might want to just put two peices of duct tape on your TV. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.