![]() |
I thought it was said the animals knew it was coming and got the hell out of there.
|
|
Originally Posted by Duran
I'm not picking on Bush because he's Bush. It's no secret that I don't care for him, but that has nothing to do with my opinions on this issue. I don't care who the President is. I want him to lead. Yes, the actual aid is very important - but don't discount the leadership factor. If Bush had gone on TV and asked the American public to donate funds, do you think that would have had an effect?
|
Originally Posted by Myster X
|
One item from a newspaper article said that "hundreds" of fishermen were missing off of the coast of, I believe, India. What I don't understand is that out at see the tidal wave was only a foot or two high, though traveling at a high rate of speed (500 mph?). I wouldn't think that a 1 or 2 foot high wave would knock over a boat, but I'm apparently wrong since so many are missing.
Are there any reports from survivors of fishing boats or other boats that were hit by these small, but fast, waves on the ocean? |
Originally Posted by Heat
One item from a newspaper article said that "hundreds" of fishermen were missing off of the coast of, I believe, India. What I don't understand is that out at see the tidal wave was only a foot or two high, though traveling at a high rate of speed (500 mph?). I wouldn't think that a 1 or 2 foot high wave would knock over a boat, but I'm apparently wrong since so many are missing.
Are there any reports from survivors of fishing boats or other boats that were hit by these small, but fast, waves on the ocean? |
Originally Posted by nevermind
Well you took care of all the dial-up arguers, that's for sure :D
|
Would a strategically placed nuclear device detonated deep off shore cause a catastrophe like this? Would anyone even know for sure if an attack was made this way?
Do you think any governments are concerned about how to cause/prevent such an attack in the future? |
Originally Posted by Gallant Pig
I thought it was said the animals knew it was coming and got the hell out of there.
|
Originally Posted by Save Ferris
Would a strategically placed nuclear device detonated deep off shore cause a catastrophe like this? Would anyone even know for sure if an attack was made this way?
Do you think any governments are concerned about how to cause/prevent such an attack in the future? |
Originally Posted by Gallant Pig
I thought it was said the animals knew it was coming and got the hell out of there.
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...ave_xkl109.jpg |
Originally Posted by Save Ferris
Would a strategically placed nuclear device detonated deep off shore cause a catastrophe like this?
This quake was of 9.0 magnitude on the Richter scale (source: USGS). The amount of energy it released is roughly equivalent to converting 220 pounds of mass into pure energy (e=mc^2 and all that). That's way, way, way the hell more than any existing nuke can do. It's roughly the amount of energy consumed by the US in a month. It's enough to boil 1300 gallons of water for every man, woman, and child on the planet. The Earth's moment of inertia is thought to have actually been decreased a bit by this blast. This thing is tied for the 4th largest quake since 1900. It was a monster. |
Originally Posted by Roto
That would be a major waste of a nuclear weapon when it could do a whole lot more damage on land. Though I think you just laid out the plot for this season of 24!
|
The only man made way this could happen would be to launch a bunch of metal/garbage in to space and then crash it into the ocean.
|
Originally Posted by Gallant Pig
I thought it was said the animals knew it was coming and got the hell out of there.
http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...1192536195.jpg |
Duran/Giantrobo, other members would like for the two of you to each take deep breath and just ignore each other for a while.
|
Originally Posted by Save Ferris
Would a strategically placed nuclear device detonated deep off shore cause a catastrophe like this? Would anyone even know for sure if an attack was made this way?
Do you think any governments are concerned about how to cause/prevent such an attack in the future? I vaguely remember a movie or a book with the plot of someone trying place nuclear device in the San Andreas fault in California to trigger a catastrophic earthquake. |
Originally Posted by Manco
I would think there would be residual radiation if some one did that.
I vaguely remember a movie or a book with the plot of someone trying place nuclear device in the San Andreas fault in California to trigger a catastrophic earthquake. I think that was Superman. |
Originally Posted by Save Ferris
Would a strategically placed nuclear device detonated deep off shore cause a catastrophe like this? Would anyone even know for sure if an attack was made this way?
Do you think any governments are concerned about how to cause/prevent such an attack in the future? |
Originally Posted by jaeufraser
I think that was Superman.
|
as of 5:20PM PST Total Collected: $3,011,242.89
Amazon.com |
Originally Posted by jaeufraser
I think that was Superman.
some of the people on the island said the waves might have been as a high as 60 feet............. |
Hate that it is to late for this time, but at least "they" are getting right on it (this is only part of the article).
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science...eut/index.html U.N.: Asia tsunami alert system by end 2005 GENEVA, Switzerland (Reuters) -- A tsunami early alert system, which could have saved thousands of lives around the Indian Ocean this week, should be in place in South and Southeast Asia within a year, a U.N. official said on Wednesday. The technology to detect undersea earthquakes, such as the one off Indonesia that unleashed Sunday's devastating waves, is used elsewhere and could be shared with vulnerable coastal communities in the region, said Salvano Briceno, head of a United Nations' disaster agency. "I want to see that every coastal country around South Asia and Southeast Asia has at least a basic but effective tsunami warning system in place by this time next year," the director of the U.N.'s International Strategy for Disaster Reduction said in a statement. |
Check with your employers -- many of them do employee matching.
I'm going to donate some money that will be matched dollar for dollar to a charity. |
Originally Posted by Sdallnct
Hate that it is to late for this time, but at least "they" are getting right on it (this is only part of the article).
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science...eut/index.html U.N.: Asia tsunami alert system by end 2005 GENEVA, Switzerland (Reuters) -- A tsunami early alert system, which could have saved thousands of lives around the Indian Ocean this week, should be in place in South and Southeast Asia within a year, a U.N. official said on Wednesday. The technology to detect undersea earthquakes, such as the one off Indonesia that unleashed Sunday's devastating waves, is used elsewhere and could be shared with vulnerable coastal communities in the region, said Salvano Briceno, head of a United Nations' disaster agency. "I want to see that every coastal country around South Asia and Southeast Asia has at least a basic but effective tsunami warning system in place by this time next year," the director of the U.N.'s International Strategy for Disaster Reduction said in a statement. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.