Cyberhome PAL to NTSC quality?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cyberhome PAL to NTSC quality?
I've got the Cyberhome 300 player as a region-free player and I've only tried one PAL disc on it, but the conversion makes the motion very jittery--the framerate is smooth for a fraction of a second and then it stutters, then it's smooth again, etc. I just wanted to know, specifically how is the Cyberhome 500 at converting PAL to NTSC? If it's much better I'll probably get that one instead. I'm not sure if a player that will convert it completely smoothly exists because of the difference in standard framerate, but I know the jitters on a Phillips dvp642 were at least much less distracting than on the CH 300.
#2
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bis22
I've got the Cyberhome 300 player as a region-free player and I've only tried one PAL disc on it, but the conversion makes the motion very jittery--the framerate is smooth for a fraction of a second and then it stutters, then it's smooth again, etc. I just wanted to know, specifically how is the Cyberhome 500 at converting PAL to NTSC? If it's much better I'll probably get that one instead. I'm not sure if a player that will convert it completely smoothly exists because of the difference in standard framerate, but I know the jitters on a Phillips dvp642 were at least much less distracting than on the CH 300.
Ciao,
Pro-B
#3
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been very happy with my CH-500. No jitters, ever. Obviously, there are better routes to take, but given that my setup is pretty basic I personally can't justify a much fancier player at the moment.
I tried one of the Philips 642s recently and didn't like it at all. Smooth playback, but serious aliasing issues on every PAL disc I tried. Don't know what the problem was, as I'd seen no mention of this in any reviews of the unit, but needless to say, I ditched it soon after.
I tried one of the Philips 642s recently and didn't like it at all. Smooth playback, but serious aliasing issues on every PAL disc I tried. Don't know what the problem was, as I'd seen no mention of this in any reviews of the unit, but needless to say, I ditched it soon after.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
I just picked up a 300 and really don't like the stutter. Has anyone tried the philips DVP3040? That's pretty much my only other option, or the TruTech, but Im guessing that is just like the CH-300.
#5
Member
The Hyundai 360A is on sale at geeks.com,
34.95
I've got the CH 500. It's ok, but with heavy use the picture quality really goes downhill.
My Toshiba sd4900 is still going strong though!
34.95
I've got the CH 500. It's ok, but with heavy use the picture quality really goes downhill.
My Toshiba sd4900 is still going strong though!
Last edited by bnx1; 07-14-06 at 05:08 PM.
#7
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bnx1
My Toshiba sd4900 is still going strong though!
I've been looking to get a new PAL>NTSC converting player for awhile, nearly purchasing the Oppo 971 last year, but the Tosh 4900 has proved itself as more than the brief stopgap I'd intended it to be (nearly three years ago?). I can't say it delivers a perfect picture - the horizontal line artifact associated with player generated subtitles crops up every now and then - but it's certainly quite watchable. And I got it B-stock for $65.
#8
I've noticed the same problem with PAL-NTSC coversion on many, but not all, of the PAL discs that I play in my Cyberhome 300. Is there any noticable difference in picture quality between the 300 and the 500?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dmkb
I've noticed the same problem with PAL-NTSC coversion on many, but not all, of the PAL discs that I play in my Cyberhome 300. Is there any noticable difference in picture quality between the 300 and the 500?
#11
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: R2 land
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bnx1
I've got the CH 500. It's ok, but with heavy use the picture quality really goes downhill.
Just curious ...
#12
Member
Originally Posted by thalion
You mean after a couple of months the unit's image quality becomes worse or if you let it run for a couple of movies in a row, you start getting image probs?
Just curious ...
Just curious ...
I've also got a Cyberhome 707B (the Walmart portable player). It's a big improvement quality wise. It's never froze or skipped or had any noticeable problems. Of course it was more expensive, still cheap though (below $200)