The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
#1951
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Perhaps, but I would imagine access to/condition of elements would also play a role given that Arrow is doing new scans on a lot of these.
With regards to new scans it looks like 9 of 14 are new. The 5 that are using old masters are the two 36th Chamber sequels, My Young Auntie, Martial Arts of Shaolin and Bare Footed Kid.
I know I should be thankful for any new scans we've gotten, but it's spoiled me to the point that I'm now extra disappointed for the ones that didn't get a new scan.
With regards to new scans it looks like 9 of 14 are new. The 5 that are using old masters are the two 36th Chamber sequels, My Young Auntie, Martial Arts of Shaolin and Bare Footed Kid.
I know I should be thankful for any new scans we've gotten, but it's spoiled me to the point that I'm now extra disappointed for the ones that didn't get a new scan.
#1952
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Yes, the 36th Chamber sequels were available. At least they were on itunes as far as I recall. They were also two of the handful of titles released on Blu ray in Hong Kong by IVL.
#1954
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
The reason why we are getting some of the lesser titles in these volumes has to do with how Celestial bundles the films for licensing. If you want to get the popular Shaws, you need to take the lesser ones too. That was the case back in the DVDs days and it seems that is still happening now.
I remember seeing when I heard news that Arrow has rights for Shaw Brothers films that it was 26. The first two volumes encompasses the 26 titles. Obviously, if Arrow is going to release more Shaws, then they have acquired or are in process of acquiring more, I'm guessing..
I think the the real gems in these collections – as well as a lot of HK titles from multiple companies – are the Frédéric Ambroisine interviews, many of which are with folks who are no longer around. I remember seeing a lot of these back when we were contributors to HKMDB around the time he was making them, and he would share them with us there (and presumably other forums he participated in). It was a bit sad that so many of his interviews weren't licensed for inclusion on DVD editions at the time, and were instead only posted on his website. Sad that it took 15-20 years for companies to finally appreciate what he was doing at the time, but I'm grateful that so much of it is finally coming out on a regular basis.
Last edited by Brian T; 08-10-22 at 10:05 AM.
#1955
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Had a feeling nothing had changed with the HK companies in this regard. Pretty sure Fortune Star operates the same way, or at least did circa the era of Shout releasing a bunch of multi-film packs of lesser titles in order to get their hands on the Jackie Chan films. There are definitely some lesser titles in that new Shaw box, but getting the gems as singles will probably never happen, or be so far down the road as to be pointless. As tempting as it is, I can hold off on this one as I did on the first one, which has remained in circulation long enough to be part of multiple sales now (even as low as $80-90 US, as I recall). I've always assumed there were at least four of these boxes planned – pretty sure I read somewhere that they had licensed around 50-ish films (?) – so have to be frugal about things.
I think the the real gems in these collections – as well as a lot of HK titles from multiple companies – are the Frédéric Ambroisine interviews. I remember seeing a lot of these back when we were contributors to HKMDB around the time he was making them, and would share them with us there (and presumably other forums he participated in). It was kind of sad that so many of his interviews weren't licensed for inclusion on DVD editions at the time, and were instead only posted on his website. Sad that it took 15-20 years for companies to finally appreciate what he was doing at the time, but I'm grateful that so much of it is finally coming out on a regular basis.
I think the the real gems in these collections – as well as a lot of HK titles from multiple companies – are the Frédéric Ambroisine interviews. I remember seeing a lot of these back when we were contributors to HKMDB around the time he was making them, and would share them with us there (and presumably other forums he participated in). It was kind of sad that so many of his interviews weren't licensed for inclusion on DVD editions at the time, and were instead only posted on his website. Sad that it took 15-20 years for companies to finally appreciate what he was doing at the time, but I'm grateful that so much of it is finally coming out on a regular basis.
#1957
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
That's the kind of lesser film that would've been a novel inclusion in this set, if only for that cash-in alternate title.
The following users liked this post:
Adam Tyner (08-10-22)
#1959
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
More insight as to why Arrow has focused on the Shaw Brothers Martial Arts films. I'm concerned once they start releasing their "lesser" films, the sales numbers will dwindle. There's no happy medium to this unless, they get licensed to the Arrow Streaming Service.
#1960
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I recall a number of those early 88 Films Shaw Blu-rays having few bonus features (aside from the occasional commentary or trailer). Not that supplements are some kind of guarantee of anything, but when there was very few on those, I generally avoided them in favour of the sheer variety that Celestial/IVL was making available on DVD and VCD out of Hong Kong. I suspect certain 'lesser selling category' titles would be more discoverable to the unfamiliar if they were mixed into Shaw boxes and supplemented with a few extra bonus features for context. Their very inclusion in these sets would lend a certain credence to them in the eyes of a lot of people who might not have bothered with them otherwise (as with the 88 Films versions, which often seemed like random choices, tossed on the market). In other words, there needs to be an "in", and the boxed sets are the best and probably only option. I'm fine if we never see comedies and dramas and musicals getting any attention in the west; they're tend to be very culturally localized. But that's also why I continually recommend people at least try and check out a few of them just so they have some context about Hong Kong cinema beyond whatever titles the boutique labels cherry-pick and what the mostly 'white guy scholars' provide as context. I'm also the first to admit that that task does get harder with each passing year, as more and more of the old IVL DVDs and VCDs just seem to vanish into personal collections and the stock has dwindled at various online shops.
The following users liked this post:
Adam Tyner (08-10-22)
#1961
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,804
Received 1,878 Likes
on
1,236 Posts
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I suspect certain 'lesser selling category' titles would be more discoverable to the unfamiliar if they were mixed into Shaw boxes and supplemented with a few extra bonus features for context. Their very inclusion in these sets would lend a certain credence to them in the eyes of a lot of people who might not have bothered with them otherwise (as with the 88 Films versions, which often seemed like random choices, tossed on the market).
The following users liked this post:
Brian T (08-10-22)
#1962
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Jame Flower:
https://criterionforum.org/forum/vie...768782#p768782
https://criterionforum.org/forum/vie...768782#p768782
ryannichols7 wrote: ↑
Wed Aug 10, 2022 2:02 pm
now if you don't mind, I actually do have some questions too! totally okay if you don't answer as I know it opens a huge can of worms and your reply gets quoted all over the internet...
1. I have noticed Arrow has done their own restorations on some films but then some of the other films use significantly older restorations (Five Shaolin Masters last night being one) - what goes into the process of how this is decided? is it elements, Celestial allowing this or that transfer, or you guys feel some of these titles its less necessary for?
2. did David Desser not want to do a commentary or video piece on this set? his track on King Boxer was fantastic, and that was a film I didn't enjoy much at all (sorry if that's sacrelige!)
3. maybe this isn't a question so much as a request: I did read the entire Twitter thread you and MichaelB were involved with about doing some non-Kung Fu titles. I obviously am very in the market for the Wuxia ones (it would make my girlfriend's year as well) but am insanely curious what opera, drama, and comedy would look like in Shawscope. I know the Kung Fu titles certainly sell, and I did see Kevin's response about acquiring more titles. I certainly hope this series is successful enough to see a mix of genres going forward, especially as you guys tell the story of Shaw Brothers more going forward. I am far less likely to buy individual titles (I did for Come Drink With Me and 8 DIagram Pole Fighter since I knew they were de facto entries, and also regarded as two of the best) and appreciate the boxing and curation of these sets - I've been annoyed all morning at the complaints from enthusiasts at how its a "waste" that The Boxer's Omen is here or something, but again I'm sure you're far less bothered than I am, which is good!
please keep this going - I'm in it for the long run and no matter how many blood splattering gorefests you guys announce, I'm on board as long as you do boxsets this expertly curated and treated. thank you guys for all you do and I hope this answer was of some value!
Wed Aug 10, 2022 2:02 pm
now if you don't mind, I actually do have some questions too! totally okay if you don't answer as I know it opens a huge can of worms and your reply gets quoted all over the internet...
1. I have noticed Arrow has done their own restorations on some films but then some of the other films use significantly older restorations (Five Shaolin Masters last night being one) - what goes into the process of how this is decided? is it elements, Celestial allowing this or that transfer, or you guys feel some of these titles its less necessary for?
2. did David Desser not want to do a commentary or video piece on this set? his track on King Boxer was fantastic, and that was a film I didn't enjoy much at all (sorry if that's sacrelige!)
3. maybe this isn't a question so much as a request: I did read the entire Twitter thread you and MichaelB were involved with about doing some non-Kung Fu titles. I obviously am very in the market for the Wuxia ones (it would make my girlfriend's year as well) but am insanely curious what opera, drama, and comedy would look like in Shawscope. I know the Kung Fu titles certainly sell, and I did see Kevin's response about acquiring more titles. I certainly hope this series is successful enough to see a mix of genres going forward, especially as you guys tell the story of Shaw Brothers more going forward. I am far less likely to buy individual titles (I did for Come Drink With Me and 8 DIagram Pole Fighter since I knew they were de facto entries, and also regarded as two of the best) and appreciate the boxing and curation of these sets - I've been annoyed all morning at the complaints from enthusiasts at how its a "waste" that The Boxer's Omen is here or something, but again I'm sure you're far less bothered than I am, which is good!
please keep this going - I'm in it for the long run and no matter how many blood splattering gorefests you guys announce, I'm on board as long as you do boxsets this expertly curated and treated. thank you guys for all you do and I hope this answer was of some value!
Thanks for the kind words Ryan (and everyone else who commented)! Really great to see that our attempts to make the set accessible to Shaw newcomers as well as diehard fans have landed as we hoped, and that people are generally pleased with the selection of films. You can't make everyone happy - especially with a catalogue as vast as Shaw Brothers to choose from! - but as I said in the Twitter thread you referred to, we're in it for the long haul, so we should be able to cover more ground in the years to come. We won't get to do everyone's favourites, but thankfully 88 and other companies are around to do so too.
To answer your questions as much as I can on a public forum:
1) When we initially acquired the films, our plan was to restore all of them, since the picture quality issues on many of the existing HD masters were part of the reason we'd avoided the catalogue originally. It quickly became clear, however, that these would be much more involved and expensive than our usual restoration workflow, even just in 2K, so the original budgets we'd acquired the films under wouldn't work. So in order to stick to budget and release the films in enough time to make our money back given the relatively short license period, we decided to only restore a little over half of them. We went through the existing masters and decided which ones were the least-worst (especially with regards DNR and 'framecutting') that could be released as they were, and prioritised the ones that most needed improvement. A couple of titles got swapped around (e.g. so we could remaster the longer cut of Chinatown Kid), and it's a shame we couldn't restore all of them, but I think it's a pretty good balance overall. With the hard-won lessons and efficiencies learned from these two sets, we're hoping to be able to restore every film on future volumes - fingers crossed this works out.
2) I don't remember exactly, but as both of the first two sets were initially planned simultaneously - the original plan was one big 26-film box which, again, quickly proved unfeasible! - I think it was just as simple as David getting the list of titles and only wanting to do King Boxer, as well as the two booklet essays. We also wanted to mix up the contributors a bit on Volume 2, and hope to again with future volumes.
3) I wasn't involved with picking the titles for Volumes 1 & 2 but have been more involved with the new package we're acquiring for Volumes 3 & 4, which does indeed veer away from kung fu a lot more. I picked the name Shawscope for our boxsets specifically so we could go into new territory in the future, and that is indeed the strategy: hopefully by now we've hooked enough people with the kung fu sets that will now be willing to go on a journey into other kinds of Shaws films with us. Indeed, working on the extras gave me a whole other list of films I'm desperately keen to see! That said, I doubt you'll see us doing the operas, melodramas and comedies anytime soon - they just aren't commercially viable at the scale we're working to with the new restorations and collectable packaging, which means genre films inevitably become the key focus. (Indeed, I'm not convinced a huangmei diao set would fly off the shelves even with just the existing Celestial masters, basic packaging and minimal extras to keep production costs down.) I'm sure we'll release more Shaws kung fu films in the future too, but we're happy to go on a bit of a tangent for now - especially as we have plenty of Golden Harvest films from Fortune Star lined up too.
To answer your questions as much as I can on a public forum:
1) When we initially acquired the films, our plan was to restore all of them, since the picture quality issues on many of the existing HD masters were part of the reason we'd avoided the catalogue originally. It quickly became clear, however, that these would be much more involved and expensive than our usual restoration workflow, even just in 2K, so the original budgets we'd acquired the films under wouldn't work. So in order to stick to budget and release the films in enough time to make our money back given the relatively short license period, we decided to only restore a little over half of them. We went through the existing masters and decided which ones were the least-worst (especially with regards DNR and 'framecutting') that could be released as they were, and prioritised the ones that most needed improvement. A couple of titles got swapped around (e.g. so we could remaster the longer cut of Chinatown Kid), and it's a shame we couldn't restore all of them, but I think it's a pretty good balance overall. With the hard-won lessons and efficiencies learned from these two sets, we're hoping to be able to restore every film on future volumes - fingers crossed this works out.
2) I don't remember exactly, but as both of the first two sets were initially planned simultaneously - the original plan was one big 26-film box which, again, quickly proved unfeasible! - I think it was just as simple as David getting the list of titles and only wanting to do King Boxer, as well as the two booklet essays. We also wanted to mix up the contributors a bit on Volume 2, and hope to again with future volumes.
3) I wasn't involved with picking the titles for Volumes 1 & 2 but have been more involved with the new package we're acquiring for Volumes 3 & 4, which does indeed veer away from kung fu a lot more. I picked the name Shawscope for our boxsets specifically so we could go into new territory in the future, and that is indeed the strategy: hopefully by now we've hooked enough people with the kung fu sets that will now be willing to go on a journey into other kinds of Shaws films with us. Indeed, working on the extras gave me a whole other list of films I'm desperately keen to see! That said, I doubt you'll see us doing the operas, melodramas and comedies anytime soon - they just aren't commercially viable at the scale we're working to with the new restorations and collectable packaging, which means genre films inevitably become the key focus. (Indeed, I'm not convinced a huangmei diao set would fly off the shelves even with just the existing Celestial masters, basic packaging and minimal extras to keep production costs down.) I'm sure we'll release more Shaws kung fu films in the future too, but we're happy to go on a bit of a tangent for now - especially as we have plenty of Golden Harvest films from Fortune Star lined up too.
The following 2 users liked this post by dex14:
Adam Tyner (08-11-22),
LorenzoL (08-12-22)
#1963
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Don't really care which ones are restored and which ones aren't anymore – it's Hong Kong cinema, Jake! – but I wonder how "relatively short" the license period is for these titles with any of the companies distributing them.
Still a bit of a shame about the comedies and dramas, as Hong Kong filmmakers have long found ways to inject martial arts or fight scenes into those as well, so there's probably a few that might quality (barely, I suspect). But it also kinda sounds like the Arrow folks – and maybe many of their contribors – really aren't familiar with stuff outside the most common genres. Yikes. I just hope his definition of 'genre' films extends beyond Kung-Fu, Wuxia and Horror. I can think of some fun 60's spy/action-style movies that would make cool additions (INTERPOL, ASIA-POL, THE ANGEL STRIKES AGAIN, SUMMONS TO DEATH). Somewhere earlier, that guy was quoted as mentioning "crime films" as well. Shaw did a set of five colourful, violent anthology pictures called THE CRIMINALS in 1976 and 1977. They were released on DVD and VCD by Celestial back in the day, but were never easy to find. I found exactly none of them, and only have them in the Ziieagle Shaw Box where they're presumably butchered for the censorship-crazed Malaysian market. Would love to see those in a future set, but I'm sure at best they'd only license a couple of them, if at all. You could easily fit all five on two Blu-rays with room for extras. Beyond those, though, Shaw did produce many other gritty crime films that might warrant inclusion: POLICE FORCE, THE DELINQUENT and BAMBOO HOUSE OF DOLLS (all 1973), KIDNAP (74), THE TAXI DRIVER (75), KILLERS ON WHEELS (76), BANK BUSTERS (78), MERCENARIES FROM HONG KONG (82; was this one already mentioned in regards to these sets?), MEN FROM THE GUTTER (83), DANGER HAS TWO FACES (85)
Still a bit of a shame about the comedies and dramas, as Hong Kong filmmakers have long found ways to inject martial arts or fight scenes into those as well, so there's probably a few that might quality (barely, I suspect). But it also kinda sounds like the Arrow folks – and maybe many of their contribors – really aren't familiar with stuff outside the most common genres. Yikes. I just hope his definition of 'genre' films extends beyond Kung-Fu, Wuxia and Horror. I can think of some fun 60's spy/action-style movies that would make cool additions (INTERPOL, ASIA-POL, THE ANGEL STRIKES AGAIN, SUMMONS TO DEATH). Somewhere earlier, that guy was quoted as mentioning "crime films" as well. Shaw did a set of five colourful, violent anthology pictures called THE CRIMINALS in 1976 and 1977. They were released on DVD and VCD by Celestial back in the day, but were never easy to find. I found exactly none of them, and only have them in the Ziieagle Shaw Box where they're presumably butchered for the censorship-crazed Malaysian market. Would love to see those in a future set, but I'm sure at best they'd only license a couple of them, if at all. You could easily fit all five on two Blu-rays with room for extras. Beyond those, though, Shaw did produce many other gritty crime films that might warrant inclusion: POLICE FORCE, THE DELINQUENT and BAMBOO HOUSE OF DOLLS (all 1973), KIDNAP (74), THE TAXI DRIVER (75), KILLERS ON WHEELS (76), BANK BUSTERS (78), MERCENARIES FROM HONG KONG (82; was this one already mentioned in regards to these sets?), MEN FROM THE GUTTER (83), DANGER HAS TWO FACES (85)
#1964
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
88 put out Region B The Mighty Peking Man in 2017 and Arrow then had the rights for Regions A & B for 2021. So what 3-4 years.
#1965
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I definitely care which ones are restored and which ones aren't. The old transfers are serviceable but are slathered in dnr and more importantly heavily frame cut. The restored titles in volume 1 are anywhere from 2 to 5 minutes longer than their unrestored counterparts. There aren't any scenes missing, but almost every edit is missing a few frames. Sometimes it isn't noticeable, but sometimes it really wrecks the flow of the editing. In the case of the Boxer From Shantung, there's an awkward edit with a freeze frame in the middle of one of the tea house fights that the celestial master just removes entirely because they thought it was an error that they couldn't fix. I'm sure that's not the only example of something like that. It's just the only one I noticed going through the previous set. The sound is also improved on the new restorations.
I get that many of us first encountered these films on terribly compromised vhs/vcd/dvd and we're used to them looking like garbage, but I'm of the opinion that the first step in respecting and legitimizing these films is to present them with the same standards that more "mainstream" fare are afforded.
I get that many of us first encountered these films on terribly compromised vhs/vcd/dvd and we're used to them looking like garbage, but I'm of the opinion that the first step in respecting and legitimizing these films is to present them with the same standards that more "mainstream" fare are afforded.
#1966
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I think it's great that people care about these, including the folks working on them, but by Arrow's own admission, titles in these first two boxes are kinda going out 'as is' and we'll live with it. But when Arrow guy says this:
I have to wonder what this means for the unrestored versions in these early batches. Will they conveniently renew licenses for those and suddenly grace us with new, restored single editions? Maybe 4K discs? Where does it end?
Incidentally, my thoughts about this aren't based on having seen the Shaw pictures looking like garbage, even though I'm sure I caught a few – unknowingly – on Detroit's Kung Fu Theatre as a kid . . . maybe. My first meaningful encounters with the vast majority of these films were actually with the IVL DVDs and some of the American DVDs that followed in their wake (and a small number I've skimmed through on the Ziieagle years ago, which looked pretty decent but had a their own problems thanks to censorship). For the time, thought, they were the best these films had ever looked, even with these relatively minor warts. The DNR and frame cutting and sweetened sound effects (ugh) weren't exactly apparent to every single person who watched their imported HK discs (well, a case could be made for the sound effects, which were shockingly mismatched). A great many enjoyed the films for their stories, choreography, photography, favourite actors, whatever, and were overjoyed to be able to see so many Shaw films that weren't martial arts related. I'd wager that a lot of folks only learned about these flaws when the review sites and various Shaw experts pointed it out, and after that, as usual, the gloves came off in some corners, less so in others like mine. I just kept scooping up what I could find because I knew this stuff wouldn't be on the market forever, and now I'm content to savour my copies of countless movies that will never see the light of day via Arrow, 88 or anyone else (and rightly so, 100 per cent), while treating myself to the cream of the crop of these new editions as money permits. I wouldn't be surprised if every single one of those earlier discs was compromised, but in the greater scheme of things circa 2006-2011, the very fact that we were getting a nearly endless stream of Shaw titles (the HK editions in particular) in all genres felt like a small miracle after being told for literally decades that the Shaw library was forever off the table.
So yeah, we got compromises in the deal – when haven't we with HK movies, historically – and regardless of how much one cares, it's obvious now that Arrow could only afford to tackle restorations on a select number of their acquisitions, and we're both – we're all – stuck with them. Can we assume that those earlier 88 Films Shaw Blu-ray releases were likely similarly compromised? Can't see them having a ton of funding for full-blown restorations back then.
With the hard-won lessons and efficiencies learned from these two sets, we're hoping to be able to restore every film on future volumes - fingers crossed this works out.
Incidentally, my thoughts about this aren't based on having seen the Shaw pictures looking like garbage, even though I'm sure I caught a few – unknowingly – on Detroit's Kung Fu Theatre as a kid . . . maybe. My first meaningful encounters with the vast majority of these films were actually with the IVL DVDs and some of the American DVDs that followed in their wake (and a small number I've skimmed through on the Ziieagle years ago, which looked pretty decent but had a their own problems thanks to censorship). For the time, thought, they were the best these films had ever looked, even with these relatively minor warts. The DNR and frame cutting and sweetened sound effects (ugh) weren't exactly apparent to every single person who watched their imported HK discs (well, a case could be made for the sound effects, which were shockingly mismatched). A great many enjoyed the films for their stories, choreography, photography, favourite actors, whatever, and were overjoyed to be able to see so many Shaw films that weren't martial arts related. I'd wager that a lot of folks only learned about these flaws when the review sites and various Shaw experts pointed it out, and after that, as usual, the gloves came off in some corners, less so in others like mine. I just kept scooping up what I could find because I knew this stuff wouldn't be on the market forever, and now I'm content to savour my copies of countless movies that will never see the light of day via Arrow, 88 or anyone else (and rightly so, 100 per cent), while treating myself to the cream of the crop of these new editions as money permits. I wouldn't be surprised if every single one of those earlier discs was compromised, but in the greater scheme of things circa 2006-2011, the very fact that we were getting a nearly endless stream of Shaw titles (the HK editions in particular) in all genres felt like a small miracle after being told for literally decades that the Shaw library was forever off the table.
So yeah, we got compromises in the deal – when haven't we with HK movies, historically – and regardless of how much one cares, it's obvious now that Arrow could only afford to tackle restorations on a select number of their acquisitions, and we're both – we're all – stuck with them. Can we assume that those earlier 88 Films Shaw Blu-ray releases were likely similarly compromised? Can't see them having a ton of funding for full-blown restorations back then.
Last edited by Brian T; 08-11-22 at 05:27 PM.
#1967
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Don't get me wrong, the IVL DVD releases are how I saw all of these movies. I had many. Still have a bunch But if they're going to re-release these in expensive sets, I'll take the new restorations. I can watch the old ones any time I want.
#1968
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Don't really care which ones are restored and which ones aren't anymore – it's Hong Kong cinema, Jake! – but I wonder how "relatively short" the license period is for these titles with any of the companies distributing them.
Still a bit of a shame about the comedies and dramas, as Hong Kong filmmakers have long found ways to inject martial arts or fight scenes into those as well, so there's probably a few that might quality (barely, I suspect). But it also kinda sounds like the Arrow folks – and maybe many of their contribors – really aren't familiar with stuff outside the most common genres. Yikes. I just hope his definition of 'genre' films extends beyond Kung-Fu, Wuxia and Horror. I can think of some fun 60's spy/action-style movies that would make cool additions (INTERPOL, ASIA-POL, THE ANGEL STRIKES AGAIN, SUMMONS TO DEATH). Somewhere earlier, that guy was quoted as mentioning "crime films" as well. Shaw did a set of five colourful, violent anthology pictures called THE CRIMINALS in 1976 and 1977. They were released on DVD and VCD by Celestial back in the day, but were never easy to find. I found exactly none of them, and only have them in the Ziieagle Shaw Box where they're presumably butchered for the censorship-crazed Malaysian market. Would love to see those in a future set, but I'm sure at best they'd only license a couple of them, if at all. You could easily fit all five on two Blu-rays with room for extras. Beyond those, though, Shaw did produce many other gritty crime films that might warrant inclusion: POLICE FORCE, THE DELINQUENT and BAMBOO HOUSE OF DOLLS (all 1973), KIDNAP (74), THE TAXI DRIVER (75), KILLERS ON WHEELS (76), BANK BUSTERS (78), MERCENARIES FROM HONG KONG (82; was this one already mentioned in regards to these sets?), MEN FROM THE GUTTER (83), DANGER HAS TWO FACES (85)
Still a bit of a shame about the comedies and dramas, as Hong Kong filmmakers have long found ways to inject martial arts or fight scenes into those as well, so there's probably a few that might quality (barely, I suspect). But it also kinda sounds like the Arrow folks – and maybe many of their contribors – really aren't familiar with stuff outside the most common genres. Yikes. I just hope his definition of 'genre' films extends beyond Kung-Fu, Wuxia and Horror. I can think of some fun 60's spy/action-style movies that would make cool additions (INTERPOL, ASIA-POL, THE ANGEL STRIKES AGAIN, SUMMONS TO DEATH). Somewhere earlier, that guy was quoted as mentioning "crime films" as well. Shaw did a set of five colourful, violent anthology pictures called THE CRIMINALS in 1976 and 1977. They were released on DVD and VCD by Celestial back in the day, but were never easy to find. I found exactly none of them, and only have them in the Ziieagle Shaw Box where they're presumably butchered for the censorship-crazed Malaysian market. Would love to see those in a future set, but I'm sure at best they'd only license a couple of them, if at all. You could easily fit all five on two Blu-rays with room for extras. Beyond those, though, Shaw did produce many other gritty crime films that might warrant inclusion: POLICE FORCE, THE DELINQUENT and BAMBOO HOUSE OF DOLLS (all 1973), KIDNAP (74), THE TAXI DRIVER (75), KILLERS ON WHEELS (76), BANK BUSTERS (78), MERCENARIES FROM HONG KONG (82; was this one already mentioned in regards to these sets?), MEN FROM THE GUTTER (83), DANGER HAS TWO FACES (85)
I wonder what Arrow will do for the fourth set? It will seem on par with the type of films that Arrow puts out that a Horror set or a set with mostly Horror films will make the most sense. The most likely candidates for this Horror set seems: the 2 Black Magic films, maybe the 3 Hex films, Seeding of a Ghost, Hell Has No Boundary, Corpse Mania, Killer Snakes, Oily Maniac, Ghost Eyes, Siamese Twins (that's a rare one). I would love it if they include Enchanted Shadow but that's probably another wishful thinking by my part.
Brian T You name some great crime and police Shaw films but my assumption will seem that if Arrow decide to add Crime films to their sets, it would be most likely Men from the Gutter, Danger Has Two Faces, Hong Kong Godfather, This Man is Dangerous or Brothers from the Walled City. As much as I would love to be wrong and for them to add The Teahouse, Big Brother Cheng or the 5 Criminal films that you mentioned, I don't think that they will.
I definitely care which ones are restored and which ones aren't. The old transfers are serviceable but are slathered in dnr and more importantly heavily frame cut. The restored titles in volume 1 are anywhere from 2 to 5 minutes longer than their unrestored counterparts. There aren't any scenes missing, but almost every edit is missing a few frames. Sometimes it isn't noticeable, but sometimes it really wrecks the flow of the editing. In the case of the Boxer From Shantung, there's an awkward edit with a freeze frame in the middle of one of the tea house fights that the celestial master just removes entirely because they thought it was an error that they couldn't fix. I'm sure that's not the only example of something like that. It's just the only one I noticed going through the previous set. The sound is also improved on the new restorations.
I get that many of us first encountered these films on terribly compromised vhs/vcd/dvd and we're used to them looking like garbage, but I'm of the opinion that the first step in respecting and legitimizing these films is to present them with the same standards that more "mainstream" fare are afforded.
I get that many of us first encountered these films on terribly compromised vhs/vcd/dvd and we're used to them looking like garbage, but I'm of the opinion that the first step in respecting and legitimizing these films is to present them with the same standards that more "mainstream" fare are afforded.
I think it's great that people care about these, including the folks working on them, but by Arrow's own admission, titles in these first two boxes are kinda going out 'as is' and we'll live with it. But when Arrow guy says this:
I have to wonder what this means for the unrestored versions in these early batches. Will they conveniently renew licenses for those and suddenly grace us with new, restored single editions? Maybe 4K discs? Where does it end?
Incidentally, my thoughts about this aren't based on having seen the Shaw pictures looking like garbage, even though I'm sure I caught a few – unknowingly – on Detroit's Kung Fu Theatre as a kid . . . maybe. My first meaningful encounters with the vast majority of these films were actually with the IVL DVDs and some of the American DVDs that followed in their wake (and a small number I've skimmed through on the Ziieagle years ago, which looked pretty decent but had a their own problems thanks to censorship). For the time, thought, they were the best these films had ever looked, even with these relatively minor warts. The DNR and frame cutting and sweetened sound effects (ugh) weren't exactly apparent to every single person who watched their imported HK discs (well, a case could be made for the sound effects, which were shockingly mismatched). A great many enjoyed the films for their stories, choreography, photography, favourite actors, whatever, and were overjoyed to be able to see so many Shaw films that weren't martial arts related. I'd wager that a lot of folks only learned about these flaws when the review sites and various Shaw experts pointed it out, and after that, as usual, the gloves came off in some corners, less so in others like mine. I just kept scooping up what I could find because I knew this stuff wouldn't be on the market forever, and now I'm content to savour my copies of countless movies that will never see the light of day via Arrow, 88 or anyone else (and rightly so, 100 per cent), while treating myself to the cream of the crop of these new editions as money permits. I wouldn't be surprised if every single one of those earlier discs was compromised, but in the greater scheme of things circa 2006-2011, the very fact that we were getting a nearly endless stream of Shaw titles (the HK editions in particular) in all genres felt like a small miracle after being told for literally decades that the Shaw library was forever off the table.
So yeah, we got compromises in the deal – when haven't we with HK movies, historically – and regardless of how much one cares, it's obvious now that Arrow could only afford to tackle restorations on a select number of their acquisitions, and we're both – we're all – stuck with them. Can we assume that those earlier 88 Films Shaw Blu-ray releases were likely similarly compromised? Can't see them having a ton of funding for full-blown restorations back then.
I have to wonder what this means for the unrestored versions in these early batches. Will they conveniently renew licenses for those and suddenly grace us with new, restored single editions? Maybe 4K discs? Where does it end?
Incidentally, my thoughts about this aren't based on having seen the Shaw pictures looking like garbage, even though I'm sure I caught a few – unknowingly – on Detroit's Kung Fu Theatre as a kid . . . maybe. My first meaningful encounters with the vast majority of these films were actually with the IVL DVDs and some of the American DVDs that followed in their wake (and a small number I've skimmed through on the Ziieagle years ago, which looked pretty decent but had a their own problems thanks to censorship). For the time, thought, they were the best these films had ever looked, even with these relatively minor warts. The DNR and frame cutting and sweetened sound effects (ugh) weren't exactly apparent to every single person who watched their imported HK discs (well, a case could be made for the sound effects, which were shockingly mismatched). A great many enjoyed the films for their stories, choreography, photography, favourite actors, whatever, and were overjoyed to be able to see so many Shaw films that weren't martial arts related. I'd wager that a lot of folks only learned about these flaws when the review sites and various Shaw experts pointed it out, and after that, as usual, the gloves came off in some corners, less so in others like mine. I just kept scooping up what I could find because I knew this stuff wouldn't be on the market forever, and now I'm content to savour my copies of countless movies that will never see the light of day via Arrow, 88 or anyone else (and rightly so, 100 per cent), while treating myself to the cream of the crop of these new editions as money permits. I wouldn't be surprised if every single one of those earlier discs was compromised, but in the greater scheme of things circa 2006-2011, the very fact that we were getting a nearly endless stream of Shaw titles (the HK editions in particular) in all genres felt like a small miracle after being told for literally decades that the Shaw library was forever off the table.
So yeah, we got compromises in the deal – when haven't we with HK movies, historically – and regardless of how much one cares, it's obvious now that Arrow could only afford to tackle restorations on a select number of their acquisitions, and we're both – we're all – stuck with them. Can we assume that those earlier 88 Films Shaw Blu-ray releases were likely similarly compromised? Can't see them having a ton of funding for full-blown restorations back then.
I was hoping that Arrow will acquire the streaming licensing for those genres that they don't see financially viable (comedy, drama, huangmei opera, musicals) and add them to their streaming service but it seems that's not how they operate. I'm hoping with with the renewed interest in the Hong Kong films, that a streaming service will pick up those Shaw films. It seems like a pipe dream but I can dream...
For those interested in knowing what other films beside their Martial Arts films Shaw made, here is my Letterboxd list that I maintain for the Shaw Brothers filmography. I'm well aware that they made over a thousand films and that list is up to 806 currently. I did not create the list initially but I have been slowly adding them to Letterboxd, which is a long and tedious process using TDMB. An internet contact was kind enough to send me all of the scanned pages from the book Shaw and Screen, detailing every single Shaw Brothers film that was released starting from their Shaw and Sons days. I have roughly over 200 films that I need to add to Letterboxd.
The Complete Shaw Brothers Filmography (in progress)
The following users liked this post:
Brian T (08-12-22)
#1969
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Preorders are going up
#1970
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
20 min trailer reel:
#1971
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Brian T You name some great crime and police Shaw films but my assumption will seem that if Arrow decide to add Crime films to their sets, it would be most likely Men from the Gutter, Danger Has Two Faces, Hong Kong Godfather, This Man is Dangerous or Brothers from the Walled City. As much as I would love to be wrong and for them to add The Teahouse, Big Brother Cheng or the 5 Criminal films that you mentioned, I don't think that they will.
I wonder what Arrow will do for the fourth set? It will seem on par with the type of films that Arrow puts out that a Horror set or a set with mostly Horror films will make the most sense. The most likely candidates for this Horror set seems: the 2 Black Magic films, maybe the 3 Hex films, Seeding of a Ghost, Hell Has No Boundary, Corpse Mania, Killer Snakes, Oily Maniac, Ghost Eyes, Siamese Twins (that's a rare one). I would love it if they include Enchanted Shadow but that's probably another wishful thinking by my part.
I only bought most of the R1 releases as I never bought the IVL DVDs and VCDs so I agree with rocket1312 that I wish they go and remastered them all. However, I understand the cost and time implication so as long as they are better than those IVL releases, and by looking at the Volume 1 set, I think they are, I'm happy.
Mind you, the IVL discs were always going to have a limited shelf life, so certainly by now the only way to see a massive portion of the library (meaning the non-martial arts and non-action pictures) is by pirating them, unless Arrow decides to start up an all-encompassing streaming option. But like you, I see little chance of that happening. At best, most boutiques would probably just stream stuff already in their disc library, plus a few complementary films in those same genres.
I vaguely recall a Shaw broadcast/satellite channel being available in Asia many years back (maybe?), but I'd imagine interest in it was short-lived, even over there. I remember a coworker back in the day who had some illegal magic box that allowed her to access various Asian broadcast networks over here, but not surprisingly she and her family were limited to whatever movies were being broadcast at a given moment (unlike streaming). I seriously doubt the entire Shaw catalog was being shown on their particular channel, but who knows. Really, to date, the best 'most-in-one' ownership option was the Ziieagle Box from 2010 – 668 Shaw movies in a slick little device smaller than most DVD players – but it had the misfortune of being released solely in a country with archaic censorship laws (and remember, don't kiss your loved one in public there or it's off to the police station with you). Resolution-wise, due to compression the films weren't quite as sharp as they looked on the IVL's DVDs – and sorry, but they did look pretty damned good on those discs – but they were still very watchable. The censor edits, however, ran the gamut from none at all, to a tolerable but still unacceptable second or two, to the downright laughable removal of entire scenes.
Regardless of it all, we're basically limited now to whatever titles Arrow, 88, Eureka or others deem worthy of licensing and can reasonably expect to profit from. Like you folks, I'm cool with that based on what I've seen so far. I hope that the 212 discs in your Shaw library at least include a decent cross-section of films from their other genres, because those are likely to remain the only discs in existence for a lot of them (especially the IVL discs), and the opportunity to find others at this point is exceedingly difficult and expensive (unless one is ok using those "other" means, I suppose?).
Last edited by Brian T; 08-12-22 at 11:19 AM.
#1972
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I never specifically avoided the IVL discs due to quality concerns (as stated, this was pretty much the only way to see these movies), although the remixed studio with the incessant chirping birds drove me absolutely bonkers. What did prevent me from buying more was simply a matter of economics. They were releasing like half a dozen titles biweekly (or was it weekly?) at their peak. At ~$12 a piece, I didn't have nearly the disposable income to keep up with all of them, especially considering these were also the salad days of HKL and Fortune Star beginning to exploit the Golden Harvest catalog. I also didn't have much access to Chinatown shops. Everything I bought was shipped over from HK.
That said, I DID specifically avoid any region 1 releases that didn't address the problems with the IVLs. Most specifically it was the inability or unwillingness of some of these labels to convert the 25fps pal masters into proper 23.96fps progressive ntsc transfers. When they just took the lazy route (as IVL did), we were stuck with transfers that showed really awful ghosting at times.
As for the horror titles mentioned above, a bunch of those were released by 88 in recent years. I'd be mildly surprised to see them revisited by Arrow given the allegedly poor sales numbers and the fact that most people in the UK who would be interested likely would have already purchased those.
That said, I DID specifically avoid any region 1 releases that didn't address the problems with the IVLs. Most specifically it was the inability or unwillingness of some of these labels to convert the 25fps pal masters into proper 23.96fps progressive ntsc transfers. When they just took the lazy route (as IVL did), we were stuck with transfers that showed really awful ghosting at times.
As for the horror titles mentioned above, a bunch of those were released by 88 in recent years. I'd be mildly surprised to see them revisited by Arrow given the allegedly poor sales numbers and the fact that most people in the UK who would be interested likely would have already purchased those.
The following users liked this post:
Brian T (08-12-22)
#1973
DVD Talk God
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I want that Shaw Brothers volume 2 set, but I think I’m going to hold out for a sale. I bought the first set week 1 and paid about $150 plus tax. I’ve seen it on sale for as low as $90 recently. I still haven’t finished completely going through it too. Expensive sets like that I want to make sure I go through it and not make it an expensive shelf decoration.
#1974
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I want that Shaw Brothers volume 2 set, but I think I’m going to hold out for a sale. I bought the first set week 1 and paid about $150 plus tax. I’ve seen it on sale for as low as $90 recently. I still haven’t finished completely going through it too. Expensive sets like that I want to make sure I go through it and not make it an expensive shelf decoration.
#1975
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Official Arrow Films 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
In Canada, they added Amazon as one of the retailers this year as Volume 1 was only available at Unobstructed View. I’m also going to hold off preordering the set as Amazon is currently listing it for retail at $220 Canadian. Unobstructed View has it for $198 but they are charging $15 extra for shipping.
I’m hoping that the set will go down in price so I can preorder as I also seen the Volume 1 at more affordable price after release. I think the cheapest I saw in Canada was for $140.
If Amazon lowers their preorder price to $190 or below, I will bite.
I’m hoping that the set will go down in price so I can preorder as I also seen the Volume 1 at more affordable price after release. I think the cheapest I saw in Canada was for $140.
If Amazon lowers their preorder price to $190 or below, I will bite.