![]() |
I don't care about which titles are included, I care about whether or not they'll get individual releases.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
This would be such a good set if it just featured Spielbergs lesser known films.
Duel 1941 Sugarland Express Always Hook now thats a set I would buy. Including Jaws, E.T and Jurassic Park just seems stupid and overkill when such great sets already exist for each. This box set is a step down for those movies. |
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by Matthew Chmiel
(Post 12156274)
To save everyone the bitching and moaning on, "Why isn't <.insert title here.> isn't included?" Here's why:
Paramount & Warner:
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
So, I'll have to buy *eight* films (three of which I already have on Blu) to get the *one* I want (DUEL)? And, I'll have to pay $200?
This is one case where I'll not feel the slightest bit guilty about heading over to the deep end (torrents) to grab DUEL. |
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by islandclaws
(Post 12155324)
nice looking set, but i'll hold off until we get separate releases of 1941 and duel.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
I'd really like Duel but that's about it as I already own Jaws and E.T. and would likely just pick up the Jurassic Park trilogy or individual releases at some point.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by rocket1312
(Post 12156405)
Since when is Munich not with Universal?
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Munich is on HBO ON Demand and it has the Dreamworks and Universal logos at the beginning. I don't recall ever seeing Paramount associated with this one.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by trespoochies
(Post 12156472)
Munich is on HBO ON Demand and it has the Dreamworks and Universal logos at the beginning. I don't recall ever seeing Paramount associated with this one.
Edit: Yeah I'm wrong. I looked it up on IMDB and it's listed there as being a Universal/Dreamworks release. |
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
I'm sure the 4 new titles will see individual releases within a year of this set's release. Personally, all I'm interested in is Duel.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by GatorDeb
(Post 12155327)
How exactly do you have a "Director's" collection and not include the two titles he won an academy award for? :hscratch:
I've got nothing on Schindler's List, however. I'm personally holding out for single releases of Duel and 1941, since I really don't feel the need to double dip on Jaws, E.T. and Jurassic Park (nor do I want to own The Lost World at all). |
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Yes, please, an individual release for 1941!
Always is really good and has Audrey Hepburn's last screen appearance. I would buy that too. I have never seen Duel or Sugarland Express though. |
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Universal holds the American distribution rights to MUNICH. Just to clear that one up. The most logical reason it's not on this set may be just for sales purposes. MUNICH is Rated R, which would make this set much less 'family friendly'.
Back cover of the Special Edition - see bottom left corner. http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/image...087ab010.L.jpg |
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Maybe they are saving Munich for next years 10th anniversary?
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 12156618)
The most logical reason it's not on this set may be just for sales purposes. MUNICH is Rated R, which would make this set much less 'family friendly'.
Like any Spielberg fan, I already own Jaws, E.T. And the Jurassic Park set. I would buy 1941 and Duel on Blu Ray if given the chance, but not this set. Have no real desire to ever watch Sugarland Express or Always again. |
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 12156618)
The most logical reason it's not on this set may be just for sales purposes. MUNICH is Rated R, which would make this set much less 'family friendly'.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Yeah, if they would've replaced Lost World with Munich, I'd buy this in a heartbeat, even though I already have three of the titles on blu.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by trespoochies
(Post 12156472)
Munich is on HBO ON Demand and it has the Dreamworks and Universal logos at the beginning. I don't recall ever seeing Paramount associated with this one.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
(Post 12156827)
Is it OAR? Last time I saw it broadcast on HBO it was not.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
I woud be tempted if it included very title Uni could release in one package. Would just sell e dup BD's I already have. But as announced, I'll skip the set and hope for individual releases. Especially 1941 and Always which never got a decent US DVD release.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
1941 is one of Spielberg's worst films. There are maybe a few funny moments, but most of the jokes fall flat. I remember I bought this is as a blind buy DVD in 1999, and it was the extended version only, so I had to sit through 2 hours and 26 minutes of that crap!
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by My Other Self
(Post 12156878)
Doesn't HBO crop everything?
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
(Post 12156827)
Is it OAR? Last time I saw it broadcast on HBO it was not.
Originally Posted by My Other Self
(Post 12156878)
Doesn't HBO crop everything?
|
I know I sound like a broken record, but it's still difficult for me to believe that this cropping BS still goes on in the age of widescreen TVs. It's really kind of sad.
|
Re: Steven Spielberg Director's Collection - 10/14
Widescreen being the standard means nothing. Joe Q Ingnorant Public wants their screen filled. Doesn't matter how much, or what part, of the picture they lose in the process.
And quite honestly, until anamprphic DVD releases and larger screens become the norm, I wasn't all about the OAR either. Letterboxing on 19" screens sucked. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.