Star Wars
#2526
Suspended
#2528
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
Same reason the LOTR Trilogy didn't make a profit... according to New Line Cinema. Remember how Peter Jackson had to sue them to get money owed? And if I remember correctly, the Tolken estate did the same.
#2530
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
Another review, far less positive. http://homecinema.thedigitalfix.com/...l-trilogy.html
Also, Bluray.com has a pretty lengthy review up, pretty favorable.
#2531
re: Star Wars
"My biggest complaint is the frozen grain (typical of Lowry remasters) that pervades the early Tatooine scenes; it just hangs there in the sky, reacting only when something passes through it. It's not quite as laggy as some of the Lowry efforts I've seen, but the staccato movement of Threepio shuffling through the desert shows it up quite badly, akin to a force field following him around."
I don't know, that doesn't sound positive to me. I could expect that on some catalog title the studio didn't care about, but this is Star Wars. Oh wait... Nevermind.
I don't know, that doesn't sound positive to me. I could expect that on some catalog title the studio didn't care about, but this is Star Wars. Oh wait... Nevermind.
#2532
DVD Talk Hero
re: Star Wars
"My biggest complaint is the frozen grain (typical of Lowry remasters) that pervades the early Tatooine scenes; it just hangs there in the sky, reacting only when something passes through it. It's not quite as laggy as some of the Lowry efforts I've seen, but the staccato movement of Threepio shuffling through the desert shows it up quite badly, akin to a force field following him around."
I don't know, that doesn't sound positive to me. I could expect that on some catalog title the studio didn't care about, but this is Star Wars. Oh wait... Nevermind.
I don't know, that doesn't sound positive to me. I could expect that on some catalog title the studio didn't care about, but this is Star Wars. Oh wait... Nevermind.
#2533
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
I was psyched about getting this today (even reorganized my schedule to go and pick it up) only to realize last night that it's a Friday release. Doh!
Seriously, WTF!? It isn't a Tuesday after a holiday, so why the damned Friday release?
I guess I'll run out and pick up Thor instead. At least it'll give me an excuse to get out of the office on Friday!
Seriously, WTF!? It isn't a Tuesday after a holiday, so why the damned Friday release?
I guess I'll run out and pick up Thor instead. At least it'll give me an excuse to get out of the office on Friday!
#2534
DVD Talk Limited Edition
re: Star Wars
It's not coming out three days late, it's coming out four days early!!
#2536
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
re: Star Wars
I hope the Canadian set doesn't have bilingual French and English plastered all over the outside.
#2537
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
That's one of the things that always bugged the snot out of me. I always wondered why Lucas would F with things that should be left alone yet leave that horrible effect untouched.
Really looking forward to seeing what the new effect looks like.
#2539
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
What's so bad about the thawing shot? That's always looked fine, it was always the matte work in the Rancor fight and when Han and Lando are talking in front of the Falcon that looked bad in ROTJ.
#2542
re: Star Wars
It's funny - Dennis Muren talks about the carbonite scene in the commentary and mentions how the bright light coming from inside the carbonite block "makes absolutely no sense" and that "there's no logic to it," and here they are adding more light to it seven years later.
#2543
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Coast
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
yeah, none of the new "fixes" ever really make much sense. as with a lot of you, the snowballing of the tweaks have finally broken the camel's back and i'm not going to be buying this set. they can keep their changes!
#2544
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Canada, BC
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
Even though I'm not thrilled with all the changes, I'm still looking forward to this set. Just to see it in full HD is going to be awesome. I do wonder if there's going to be other debates where folks prefer the original SE over the latest release. Seems like the original OT movies are a thing of the past that we'll never see released again
#2545
DVD Talk Hero
re: Star Wars
That scene always bothered me, even when I was a kid. It's an interesting visual, but all of the beams of light makes it look like Han Solo is glowing like Edward Cullen at a beach. Something in that scene is obviously giving off a lot of light; the beams imply that it's from inside, and the only thing in there is Han Solo.
#2548
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA GO PENS!
Posts: 4,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
Well, it looks like they've actually fixed that part - the light is now emanating from the edges of the carbonite burning away, rather than from Han like in the original. I'll admit it looks better...
#2549
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Coast
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
they should've went the whole nine yards and added church choir music to go with that silly angelic light that Han's emitting. ahhhhhhhhAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!
#2550
DVD Talk Hall of Fame