![]() |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Rambo 3 BD fixed the missing subtitle problem from it's last few DVD releases.
|
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10024678)
For Army of Darkness, I prefer the regular Theatrical Cut (I'm not crazy about the Director's/Extended cuts of this film). And I have the DVD from the HD-DVD/DVD combo, which I hear is better quality than the newer Screwhead DVD edition. So I'm thinking which one has the better video quality if I like the Theatrical version:
the remastered DVD from the HD-DVD/DVD combo or the Blu Ray Screwhead edition? (or the quality difference is small and not worth the upgrade?)
Originally Posted by NEUMANN
(Post 10025566)
I think that the movie with the biggest change from a crappy bare bones,bad transfer, non anamorphic dvd to a blu ray with a great transfer, filled to the brim with extras(not to mention different versions of the movie) would be Bladerunner. It went from one of the worst dvd's to one of the best blu rays
|
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Originally Posted by NEUMANN
(Post 10025566)
I think that the movie with the biggest change from a crappy bare bones,bad transfer, non anamorphic dvd to a blu ray with a great transfer, filled to the brim with extras(not to mention different versions of the movie) would be Bladerunner. It went from one of the worst dvd's to one of the best blu rays
|
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Grumpy Old Men & Grumpier Old Men were both released in Full Screen on DVD, but got proper widescreen release on Blu. Presumed Innocent was non-anamorphic on DVD.
Austin Powers IMOM was released in 2:00:1 on DVD, but the Blu-ray got the original 2:35:1 theatrical ratio. Primal Fear was non-anamorphic on DVD, but was replaced with a new anamorphic DVD the same day as the Blu came out. Same thing with Nixon. |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
The Arrival (non-anamorphic DVD previously)
Waiting (the DVD transfer sucked as it didn't even take up 3GB, BD is dual-layered; enough said). |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Originally Posted by Drexl
(Post 10025750)
Should we even count titles that got simultaneous DVD upgrades?
|
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 10025688)
The old BR was anamorphic, but it was a terrible transfer (some folks believe it was an upconverted laserdisc transfer, which sucks of course, but at least it would automatically scale to the sides on a widescreen set). But otherwise, an incredible upgrade (and I only have the SD version).
The DVD's problem was compression quality. It was one of the very first DVDs ever released. It took the studios a few years to get the hang of digital compression. That disc looks pretty atrocious on a large screen these days. However, Warner did remaster the movie and re-released it on DVD in 2006, prior to the Final Cut or Blu-ray (which came at the end of 2007). It was a no-frills disc with just the Director's Cut in a new transfer. http://www.dvdempire.com/Exec/v4_ite...tem_id=1188823 |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
I'll throw in a vote for '2010'. The DVD is non-anamorphic letterbox and looks pretty cruddy. To my knowledge, it was never re-released on DVD. But a Blu-ray was released last year.
The movie is still grainy and murky, of course. That's just the style it was shot in. Nonetheless, the Blu-ray is a huge improvement over the DVD. |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Originally Posted by WMAangel
(Post 10025966)
I vote no...I think the discussion should remain with BD titles that are still only available in a crippled form on DVD, whether that is just a terrible looking anamorphic transfer, a non-anamorphic transfer, or a non-OAR presentation....
|
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 10026519)
I have every laserdisc edition of Blade Runner. (Literally, all of them.) The first DVD was a new transfer, different from those used on laserdisc. Aside from being anamorphically enhanced, it had deeper black levels and richer colors, and was quite a bit sharper.
The DVD's problem was compression quality. It was one of the very first DVDs ever released. It took the studios a few years to get the hang of digital compression. That disc looks pretty atrocious on a large screen these days. However, Warner did remaster the movie and re-released it on DVD in 2006, prior to the Final Cut or Blu-ray (which came at the end of 2007). It was a no-frills disc with just the Director's Cut in a new transfer. http://www.dvdempire.com/Exec/v4_ite...tem_id=1188823
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 10026539)
I'll throw in a vote for '2010'. The DVD is non-anamorphic letterbox and looks pretty cruddy. To my knowledge, it was never re-released on DVD. But a Blu-ray was released last year.
The movie is still grainy and murky, of course. That's just the style it was shot in. Nonetheless, the Blu-ray is a huge improvement over the DVD. |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Originally Posted by TheKing
(Post 10025868)
Grumpy Old Men & Grumpier Old Men were both released in Full Screen on DVD, but got proper widescreen release on Blu. Presumed Innocent was non-anamorphic on DVD.
Austin Powers IMOM was released in 2:00:1 on DVD, but the Blu-ray got the original 2:35:1 theatrical ratio. Primal Fear was non-anamorphic on DVD, but was replaced with a new anamorphic DVD the same day as the Blu came out. Same thing with Nixon. (dont get me wrong it annoyed the heck out of me not having theatrical aspect ratio) It was Director Jay Roach's decision to have it be in the 2:00:1 aspect instead of the 2:35:1 theatrical aspect ratio seen in theatres. just glad that he decided to revert back to the OAR for the bluray release. |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
The first thing I thought of was Lola Montes, if only because the Fox-Lorber DVD is one of the worst ever (I'm not a huge fan of the movie). The Criterion BD reportedly looks and sounds extremely good.
|
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Originally Posted by AmityBoatTours
(Post 10027207)
Iam not sure that Austin powers would fall into that catagory though.
(dont get me wrong it annoyed the heck out of me not having theatrical aspect ratio) It was Director Jay Roach's decision to have it be in the 2:00:1 aspect instead of the 2:35:1 theatrical aspect ratio seen in theatres. just glad that he decided to revert back to the OAR for the bluray release. |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
A few more that provided fixes:
A Bridge Too Far Dirty Dozen (so-so transfer but still an improvement over the VHS quality DVD) Enemy Of The State Another in need of a widescreen release: Can't Buy Me Love |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
From Dusk 'til Dawn (Canada)
The Nightmare Before Christmas Both replaced non-anamorphic versions. P.S. - be careful with the imports of Bound. I've read the transfers are just SD upscales. I'm waiting for a Region A release. |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
(Post 10029768)
The Nightmare Before Christmas
replaced non-anamorphic versions. |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
and as a reversal in which DVDs are better than the Blu rays, can anyone confirm it with these titles:
GLADIATOR WATCHMEN (Director's Cut) - I have heard this Blu Ray being very problematic on Samsungs, but what about other players? |
Re: What are the essential Blu-Rays that fix problematic DVDs?
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10030788)
and as a reversal in which DVDs are better than the Blu rays, can anyone confirm it with these titles:
GLADIATOR The complaints against this one (and the Star Trek catalog titles) all depend on the frame of reference people are using....for high definition, they can (and should) look better than they do, however that does not then mean that the DVDs are better....
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10030788)
WATCHMEN (Director's Cut) - I have heard this Blu Ray being very problematic on Samsungs, but what about other players?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.