Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
#1
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
First of all-I have a 32 in. Sanyo HD tv. Watched The Thing last night. Pretty familiar with movie since I own it on laserdisc and dvd. Is it better than the laserdisc--yes. How about dvd? Slightly better. There isn't alot of grain in the movie to begin with so trying to find differences might be difficult. The dts soundtrack sounded like a louder version of the dvd dolby digital . Next movie will be Goldfinger. I'm glad I didn't go bonkers and buy every blu-ray in sight since the first movie was disappointing. Hopefully the next movie(s) will be a big improvement. Bottom line. If a movie has alittle grain in it and the blu-ray doesn't-is it worth the upgrade---no. Plus with The Thing-you couldn't watch the documentary unless you watched it as you watched the movie. No -theatrical trailer. Even the laserdisc had one.
Last edited by dvd-4-life; 01-05-10 at 10:36 AM.
#3
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,805
Received 1,879 Likes
on
1,237 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
If you're sitting a healthy distance away from such a small display, the differences between pretty much any format will quickly fade away. It might also be worth verifying that your player is outputting in HD. (The Sony player I bought my father for Christmas was 480p out of the box.)
#4
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sunnydale
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
Yeah, not impressed with Blu-ray either. Some people tell me I need to buy a new TV to really experience it. So, buy a new TV when there is nothing wrong with the one I have, buy a Blu-ray player, and Blu-ray's themselves(which seem to cost a little more than DVDs from everything I have seen in stores)?. Yeah, no thanks. No need to upgrade to something I don't need and waste money I don't have much of on something that isn't worth it. Now, if they make something that actually transports you into the Phoebe Cates/Fast Times/Pool Scene, then maybe an upgrade will be necessary.
#5
Cool New Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
Yeah, not impressed with Blu-ray either. Some people tell me I need to buy a new TV to really experience it. So, buy a new TV when there is nothing wrong with the one I have, buy a Blu-ray player, and Blu-ray's themselves(which seem to cost a little more than DVDs from everything I have seen in stores)?. Yeah, no thanks. No need to upgrade to something I don't need and waste money I don't have much of on something that isn't worth it. Now, if they make something that actually transports you into the Phoebe Cates/Fast Times/Pool Scene, then maybe an upgrade will be necessary.
#6
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
I have an old 1080i plasma from years ago and a BD player. BD blows away DVD in all aspects IMO even on my old equipment. I havent bought a DVD in a long time and probably never will. BD FTW!
#7
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
I would like to see a movie like Outland(non-stop grainy picture) come out on blu-ray. Then you could really tell the difference. Maybe The Thing was a bad choice for the first viewed movie. Paying more for a movie, then receiving less features isn't going to help sell the system. Unless they are planning a special edition with the photo gallery,then a special special edition with the trailer,then the special special remastered edition that has the documentary on it.
#8
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
If you're sitting a healthy distance away from such a small display, the differences between pretty much any format will quickly fade away. It might also be worth verifying that your player is outputting in HD. (The Sony player I bought my father for Christmas was 480p out of the box.)
#10
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
I'm sitting about 10 feet away. I certainly can tell the difference between laserdisc and dvd but so far blu-ray only looks slightly better than dvd even though its suppose to be about 4 times better(picture quality). I am judging this on only one movie so my opinion could change.
#11
Banned
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
First of all-I have a 32 in. Sanyo HD tv. Watched The Thing last night. Pretty familiar with movie since I own it on laserdisc and dvd. Is it better than the laserdisc--yes. How about dvd? Slightly better. There isn't alot of grain in the movie to begin with so trying to find differences might be difficult. The dts soundtrack sounded like a louder version of the dvd dolby digital . Next movie will be Goldfinger. I'm glad I didn't go bonkers and buy every blu-ray in sight since the first movie was disappointing. Hopefully the next movie(s) will be a big improvement. Bottom line. If a movie has alittle grain in it and the blu-ray doesn't-is it worth the upgrade---no. Plus with The Thing-you couldn't watch the documentary unless you watched it as you watched the movie. No -theatrical trailer. Even the laserdisc had one.
Yeah, not impressed with Blu-ray either. Some people tell me I need to buy a new TV to really experience it. So, buy a new TV when there is nothing wrong with the one I have, buy a Blu-ray player, and Blu-ray's themselves(which seem to cost a little more than DVDs from everything I have seen in stores)?. Yeah, no thanks. No need to upgrade to something I don't need and waste money I don't have much of on something that isn't worth it. Now, if they make something that actually transports you into the Phoebe Cates/Fast Times/Pool Scene, then maybe an upgrade will be necessary.
#12
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
I started watching Blu-ray on my 720p projector and the difference was remarkable. I've since upgraded to a 1080p projector and we've recently got a 32" 1080p LG HDTV for the living room and the picture is still remarkable.
Another things is... half the experience is having lossless surround sound. That might necessitate a receiver upgrade but MAN it's like night and day once you have a good setup. I liken it to listening to 128kbs mp3s and then listening to the actual CD.
I say if you don't see a difference. Stick with DVD. It's cheaper! I tell all my friends with older TVs to do so.
Another things is... half the experience is having lossless surround sound. That might necessitate a receiver upgrade but MAN it's like night and day once you have a good setup. I liken it to listening to 128kbs mp3s and then listening to the actual CD.
I say if you don't see a difference. Stick with DVD. It's cheaper! I tell all my friends with older TVs to do so.
#13
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Update: BACK
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
You're doing it wrong. 10' away from a 32"? Come on already, just get an ipod to watch movies. I sit 7-8 feet from my 51".
And they screwed The Thing on BR anyway, grab the HD DVD and you'll be happy about the upgrade.
Sorry, but if you have the right setup, and setup correctly, 75% of the HD-discs out there will blow away DVD, let alone LD. I watched Harry Potter & the Prisoner of Azkaban again last night (3rd viewing since I've owned it) and I am still bowled over by the stunning picture. A minimal amount of research will get you to the quality you're expecting.
And they screwed The Thing on BR anyway, grab the HD DVD and you'll be happy about the upgrade.
Sorry, but if you have the right setup, and setup correctly, 75% of the HD-discs out there will blow away DVD, let alone LD. I watched Harry Potter & the Prisoner of Azkaban again last night (3rd viewing since I've owned it) and I am still bowled over by the stunning picture. A minimal amount of research will get you to the quality you're expecting.
#14
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Formerly known as "12thmonkey"/Frankfort, IL
Posts: 7,790
Received 35 Likes
on
31 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
I think a properly tweaked audio setup is invaluable to the enjoyment of a DVD, Blu-Ray or otherwise. I know when people see/hear something on my set (I have a 50" 720p Panny plasma) it is the sound that really seals the "wow" factor.
As for the OP, I think sitting 10 ft from a 32 in display is too far to perhaps notice the image quality improvements BD can provide (assuming your system is set to the correct settings).
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
I'm sitting about 10 feet away. I certainly can tell the difference between laserdisc and dvd but so far blu-ray only looks slightly better than dvd even though its suppose to be about 4 times better(picture quality). I am judging this on only one movie so my opinion could change.
When something is too small to see, do you give up and say "that's something I'm never going to be able to see?" Or do you move closer so you can see it better?
BD has 4x the pixels. Therefore they are 4x smaller than the ones on a DVD. Can you see the individual pixels on your 32" TV from 10 feet away? No, you can't. So how can you possibly expect to see the difference between that and something a quarter that size?
You need to be more like 5 feet away if you're watching HD content, in order for your eyes to resolve the additional detail.
#16
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
Yeah, not impressed with Blu-ray either. Some people tell me I need to buy a new TV to really experience it. So, buy a new TV when there is nothing wrong with the one I have, buy a Blu-ray player, and Blu-ray's themselves(which seem to cost a little more than DVDs from everything I have seen in stores)?. Yeah, no thanks. No need to upgrade to something I don't need and waste money I don't have much of on something that isn't worth it. Now, if they make something that actually transports you into the Phoebe Cates/Fast Times/Pool Scene, then maybe an upgrade will be necessary.
Why bother spending time reading posts in the HD talk forum?
#17
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
I would like to see a movie like Outland(non-stop grainy picture) come out on blu-ray. Then you could really tell the difference. Maybe The Thing was a bad choice for the first viewed movie. Paying more for a movie, then receiving less features isn't going to help sell the system. Unless they are planning a special edition with the photo gallery,then a special special edition with the trailer,then the special special remastered edition that has the documentary on it.
#18
Moderator
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
I TRIED WATCH BLUEWAY MOVIE ON MY 13" B&W TV FROM 1982. IT LOOK SAME AS VCR. BLUEWAY IS RIPOFF, i say
#20
DVD Talk Special Edition
#21
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
First of all-I have a 32 in. Sanyo HD tv. Watched The Thing last night. Pretty familiar with movie since I own it on laserdisc and dvd. Is it better than the laserdisc--yes. How about dvd? Slightly better. There isn't alot of grain in the movie to begin with so trying to find differences might be difficult. The dts soundtrack sounded like a louder version of the dvd dolby digital . Next movie will be Goldfinger. I'm glad I didn't go bonkers and buy every blu-ray in sight since the first movie was disappointing. Hopefully the next movie(s) will be a big improvement. Bottom line. If a movie has alittle grain in it and the blu-ray doesn't-is it worth the upgrade---no. Plus with The Thing-you couldn't watch the documentary unless you watched it as you watched the movie. No -theatrical trailer. Even the laserdisc had one.
I have 46" 1080p Sony Bravia in my family room and 60" 1080p Pioneer Kuro in my basement and the quality of Blu-ray is absolutely mind-blowing, even regular DVDs look great on them.
You need a minimum 40" to really see the difference and there is a HUGE difference between DVD and Blu-ray. Don't blame the quality of Blu-ray just because your crappy tv can't perform the way it should.
Get a better tv with decent surround...test out the discs...then come back here to give your opinion.
#22
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Detroit
Posts: 3,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
I have a 32" 720p Samsung and the difference from DVD to Blu-ray for most titles on that is astounding. I can only imagine how good things are going to look when I eventually get a larger television. And older movies, while incredibly clear-looking in HD, don't always look as good as a more recent film. Like some others said, check out WALL-E, check out Transformers 2, etc. The format definitely improves older films, but you will be blown away by most newer films.
#23
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
Hell I have a 30" Tube HD TV and the difference between DVD and Blu is huge. That said, I'm not 10' away.
Difference is more noteable on my 720p projector heh.
Difference is more noteable on my 720p projector heh.
#25
Re: Just watched my first blu-ray movie-not impressed
Usually I face away from the TV, because the light from it hurts my eyes. I watch movies through an elaborate system of mirrors several miles from the actual set.