![]() |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Shazam
(Post 9845672)
ST books are never canon. Not even sure how they could be. So many of them contradict each other and just have tons of made up shit.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 9845199)
It's not like the ST cartoons are canon right?
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Bart: "None of these stories really happened"
CBG: "Get. Out. Of. My. Store" |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by MadonnasManOne
(Post 9840289)
Your results my vary, of course, but, I picked up the Target 3-Disc Blu-Ray Exclusive Enterprise Case version, and it rang up at $24.99! AWESOME.
Also noticed that the regular BR says 30 featurettes while the Enterprise Case says 31 featurettes. Any truth to that?, haven't seen mine yet. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Maybe the case is the feature? :)
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
heh heh
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Loved the movie and I bought the Target Edition when I saw it. There were only 2 left and I grabbed one and gave the other to a person also looking to buy the blu-ray.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
After much struggling with the decision and looking carefully at pictures of the Star Trek ship in the $24.99 Target package, I decided the ship wasn't THAT great and would just take up space and collect dust, so I'll return it. For about $8 in savings I ordered it from Amazon for $18.99... not quite as cheap as others' Gold Box deal but good enough for me.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
I got this for $15 total from Hastings the night of release as part of a B1G1. I still haven't watched it though...
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Watched it again with the commentary. Those guys are always great with these but I learnt quite alot.
One of the main things I learnt was when Kirk was eating the apple it wasn't to do with Wrath of Khan! He says that he once heard a reviewer say he hates seeing actors eat apples in films so he put that in there. But I'm not sure. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by jdslater1
(Post 9857856)
Watched it again with the commentary. Those guys are always great with these but I learnt quite alot.
One of the main things I learnt was when Kirk was eating the apple it wasn't to do with Wrath of Khan! He says that he once heard a reviewer say he hates seeing actors eat apples in films so he put that in there. But I'm not sure. They said people looke "cocky" when they are eating apples, so he wanted that attitude for Kirk. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Even if it wasn't intentionally an homage to TWOK, it certainly was subconsciously. Artists do a lot of things in tribute to other works that they don't, themselves, realize.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
pretty sure, it was definately an intentional choice, to give a tip of the hat to the scene from TWOK. as big of trek fan as Orci is,I cant help but think they are just trying to down play it for somereason. there are to many little nods and referances to the old trek for this not to be intentional.
Originally Posted by jdslater1
(Post 9857856)
Watched it again with the commentary. Those guys are always great with these but I learnt quite alot.
One of the main things I learnt was when Kirk was eating the apple it wasn't to do with Wrath of Khan! He says that he once heard a reviewer say he hates seeing actors eat apples in films so he put that in there. But I'm not sure. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Okay, please forgive me if this has already been addressed, but I have a plot question:
Spoiler:
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by AmityBoatTours
(Post 9859277)
pretty sure, it was definately an intentional choice, to give a tip of the hat to the scene from TWOK. as big of trek fan as Orci is,I cant help but think they are just trying to down play it for somereason. there are to many little nods and referances to the old trek for this not to be intentional.
You could have put the apple eating while he was getting on the shuttle or something. |
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 9860129)
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Intentional or not, it was a very cool nod to TWOK.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 9860129)
Okay, please forgive me if this has already been addressed, but I have a plot question:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
With the $5.00 BD coupon at Target, this was $14.99 or $19.99 for their Enterprise exclusive. I didn't want or need the special packaging, so $14.99 is nice for the 3-disc Blu-ray.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 9862335)
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 9863087)
Okay,
Spoiler:
Originally Posted by Kory
(Post 9862711)
With the $5.00 BD coupon at Target, this was $14.99 or $19.99 for their Enterprise exclusive. I didn't want or need the special packaging, so $14.99 is nice for the 3-disc Blu-ray.
Spoiler:
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 9860129)
Okay, please forgive me if this has already been addressed, but I have a plot question:
Spoiler:
From the "Star Trek: Nero" comic book from IDW (which has a story credited to screenwriters Kurtzman and Orci): Spoiler:
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 9863516)
You really want to know?
From the "Star Trek: Nero" comic book from IDW (which has a story credited to screenwriters Kurtzman and Orci): Spoiler:
Okay...the Narada had a mind of its own? Was it Borg tech or something? I thought of something else: Spoiler:
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
If it needs a comic to explain something in the film...it's not a great way to explain it.
|
Re: Star Trek: Nov 17
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 9863598)
Okay...the Narada had a mind of its own? Was it Borg tech or something?
Yes, the Narada was based on Borg technology, according to the "Star Trek: Countdown" series, also from IDW. The "Countdown" series takes place a few years after "Star Trek: Nemesis" and shows the events leading up to the destruction of Romulus, explains why Nero hates Spock, shows where the Narada and Spock's ship came from, and had a number of cameos from ST:TNG characters. I'm not sure whether or not the comics are considered to be fully canon, but they do have the screenwriters credited with the stories, and I doubt most of these plot points will ever be addressed again future films. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.