![]() |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
I find it kind of cool that Spielberg makes some remarks about Lucas' recent actions but...what does he actually think of Lucas? I mean...he sure as hell can't be happy about it. Wonder what Scorsese thinks about it considerings he's such a film restoration guy.
I hope it includes Indy IV...cuz I do enjoy it...though it does lack in quality. Also....it had some solid features. |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
fellow colleagues would not dare insult by publicly commenting, but i would think most of them are fans as well as creators of film and do not share Lucas's zeal for revisionism. even Spielberg gave us two versions of ET!
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by Dr. Mantle
(Post 10922175)
Did you not read the post that was right above yours?
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
I'm not saying to go out and blast him but...you know? What do they think? As much as we blast Lucas...hell even Chaplin kept changing his works. Difference being that well...we can call Lucas out cuz we (the consumer) have proof of those changes. Chaplin's admirers didn't have that.
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by darmok
(Post 10922286)
fellow colleagues would not dare insult by publicly commenting, but i would think most of them are fans as well as creators of film and do not share Lucas's zeal for revisionism. even Spielberg gave us two versions of ET!
There are plenty of times that collegues in the film industry have insulted each other in the film industry, those who have worked togeather on a film, those who havent worked togeather on a film but for the same studio and those who have not worked togeather or done a movie under the same studio. Lucas and Spielberg relationship goes far beyond merely being colleagues in the same industry they are friends so thats why he says George is George and while i dont think its appropriate for my films, those are his films and he can do with them what he wants. |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by Dr. Mantle
(Post 10922175)
Did you not read the post that was right above yours?
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Lucas will probably add Tarzan yelling to Shia swinging with the monkeys, ughh...
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by SethDLH
(Post 10921897)
when does Indy shooting the arab swordsman go from a gun to a cannon?
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by SethDLH
(Post 10922341)
Yea, I read it. If they're waiting another 12 months to release it Lucas has plenty of time to screw around with it. I'll believe it is a proper BD release when I see that it is in fact a proper BD release.
You just have to pray that Spielberg outlives George Lucas. The print from last nights screening looked amazing and there was no digital tinkering with it either. Iam sure if any of the sold out audience I was lucky enough to watch the film with are members on here will post the similar thoughts on its presentation last night . It looked amazing. |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
The only change I'd ever like to see in Raiders would be if they removed that wall of fire when Belloq's head explodes.
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 10922260)
I find it kind of cool that Spielberg makes some remarks about Lucas' recent actions but...what does he actually think of Lucas? I mean...he sure as hell can't be happy about it. Wonder what Scorsese thinks about it considerings he's such a film restoration guy.
When someone has made up their mind to do something really stupid, you can't stop them and will only damage or destroy your friendship, and your only option is to stand back and watch. |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Spielberg referred to Lucas as his best friend at the Tintin panel at SDCC.
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Word is that Shia LaBeouf is filming "bookends" for the beginning and end of each movie, along with narration throughout. In order to keep the running time the same, selective edits will be made to the "slower parts".
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by groucho
(Post 10922775)
word is that shia labeouf is filming "bookends" for the beginning and end of each movie, along with narration throughout. In order to keep the running time the same, selective edits will be made to the "slower parts".
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 10922260)
I hope it includes Indy IV...cuz I do enjoy it...though it does lack in quality. Also....it had some solid features.
Also, on a semi-related note, I hear Spielberg has inferred that the SE of E.T. won't be included when that film comes to Blu-ray. Am I the only one here who actually would mind owning a copy of that version in 1080p (with the original 1982 version included in the same package, of course) if only for the added scenes of E.T. falling in the tub and the extended Halloween scenes? |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by John Pannozzi
(Post 10923596)
Also, on a semi-related note, I hear Spielberg has inferred that the SE of E.T. won't be included when that film comes to Blu-ray. Am I the only one here who actually would mind owning a copy of that version in 1080p (with the original 1982 version included in the same package, of course) if only for the added scenes of E.T. falling in the tub and the extended Halloween scenes?
Spielberg also confirmed again that E.T. is coming to Blu-ray from Universal in 2012, but likely only the original theatrical cut. He asked the audience if they'd care if the "new" version wasn't on the Blu-ray, which generated a big "NO!" Spielberg acknowledged this and said he regrets making the changes he did for the DVD. |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by trespoochies
(Post 10923645)
I didn't care for any of the changes, so never seeing the SE on BD is fine by me. He spoke about it during the Raiders screening.
Spielberg also confirmed again that E.T. is coming to Blu-ray from Universal in 2012, but likely only the original theatrical cut. He asked the audience if they'd care if the "new" version wasn't on the Blu-ray, which generated a big "NO!" Spielberg acknowledged this and said he regrets making the changes he did for the DVD. |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
I agree, put them in as deleted scenes in HD.
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by trespoochies
(Post 10923645)
I didn't care for any of the changes, so never seeing the SE on BD is fine by me. He spoke about it during the Raiders screening.
Spielberg also confirmed again that E.T. is coming to Blu-ray from Universal in 2012, but likely only the original theatrical cut. He asked the audience if they'd care if the "new" version wasn't on the Blu-ray, which generated a big "NO!" Spielberg acknowledged this and said he regrets making the changes he did for the DVD. |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by LosingMyMind
(Post 10923801)
WTF, that's the version that I saw in theaters. Well if that's the case, they just lost a sale to me.
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by freshticles
(Post 10925621)
I think you're in a very small minority. I assume they'd lose more sales if they put out that horribly bastardized version on blu.
|
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
The only "updates" to E.T. that I didn't mind were the more natural running scene at the very beginning and the effects on the ship at the very end. Other than that, it was just junk. They wanted E.T. to move more realistically ? No. It just looked fake and takes you right out of the awesome-ness of the movie. The puppet E.T. was perfectly realistic. I just bought the Ultimate Gift Set from 2002 and will definately pick up the blu-ray.....even though you KNOW it won't have a commentary on it. I would like to hear one from the three kids and the mom, though.
As for Indy....a great idea would be to have a replica Ark of the covenant that you take the lid off of to get the blu-rays inside. They could even have yellow LED lights around the inside edge to give off a holy glow. |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by SethDLH
(Post 10922341)
Yea, I read it. If they're waiting another 12 months to release it Lucas has plenty of time to screw around with it. I'll believe it is a proper BD release when I see that it is in fact a proper BD release.
Originally Posted by trespoochies
(Post 10923645)
Originally Posted by John Pannozzi
(Post 10923596)
Also, on a semi-related note, I hear Spielberg has inferred that the SE of E.T. won't be included when that film comes to Blu-ray. Am I the only one here who actually would mind owning a copy of that version in 1080p (with the original 1982 version included in the same package, of course) if only for the added scenes of E.T. falling in the tub and the extended Halloween scenes?
Spielberg also confirmed again that E.T. is coming to Blu-ray from Universal in 2012, but likely only the original theatrical cut. He asked the audience if they'd care if the "new" version wasn't on the Blu-ray, which generated a big "NO!" Spielberg acknowledged this and said he regrets making the changes he did for the DVD. |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by droidguy1119
(Post 10822471)
<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/e_sFW8grQtU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Assuming the bottom shot features the CG manipulation, it looks much less detailed than the original. I assume it was changed mainly to insert the shadow of the vehicle along the cliff face as it falls. At least it's subtle -- but honestly, who out there was really bothered by this shot? Some artist probably spent many hours of their life creating that original matte painting and it looked just fine. :grumble: |
Re: Indy trilogy possibly to Blu by year's end
Originally Posted by joe_b
(Post 10925851)
Despite Spielberg's comments about Raiders remaining unaltered, I wonder if this change will still make the BD.
Assuming the bottom shot features the CG manipulation, it looks much less detailed than the original. I assume it was changed mainly to insert the shadow of the vehicle along the cliff face as it falls. At least it's subtle -- but honestly, who out there was really bothered by this shot? Some artist probably spent many hours of their life creating that original matte painting and it looked just fine. :grumble: But that's not the first time CGI was added to Raiders. I remember the back cover of the VHS making a point of how brand new computer effects were added to the climax when the Ark is opened. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.