![]() |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by asianxcore
(Post 10077367)
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
I have to admit if these were the EE's I'd have bought them even with the current PQ because it is somewhat of an improvement over the DVD, and audio upgrade would be great. But The TE's + the lackluster makes it incredibly easy to stay away.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by naitram
(Post 10082200)
I'm still excited for this, but $60 for basically three HD discs is kind of ridiculous. 3 DVDs and 3 digital copies? What a waste, I'm sick of paying a premium for shit I'll never use, just give me the movies and charge less.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by naitram
(Post 10082200)
I'm still excited for this, but $60 for basically three HD discs is kind of ridiculous. 3 DVDs and 3 digital copies? What a waste, I'm sick of paying a premium for shit I'll never use, just give me the movies and charge less.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Yeah, but you tend to get a discount when you buy multiple movies together. Then again, this is LOTR, so I can't blame them.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Yeah whatever, I'm spoiled on good deals...I don't know, it's a set - of almost 10 year old movies. After $40 for an entire season of Star Trek, or $37 for 6 Rocky movies, yes I'm spoiled...but it's LOTR blah blah!
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Yeah, it's hard to get excited about $20 a piece for bare bones discs, theatrical cuts at that... especially after all the negative reviews about the pic quality.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by doctorthodt
(Post 10082786)
Yeah......what? $20 per film isn't "kind of ridiculous" at all.
- catalog releases - barebones - below-average bd transfers - theatrical versions - bundled together |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
I was planning on getting this. I had mine pre-ordered for awhile, but decided to cancel it last night since Amazon usually begins the shipping phase on Friday mornings. A trilogy as big as this one should be getting video reviews of 4.5 and 5, not 2.5 and 3.0. I still may cave next week and grab it at Best Buy. I did preorder there to get the steelbook. But I may end up just waiting on a price drop, or be patient and wait for something better. I'm not sure I want to give WB $60 for what looks like a lazy cash-in release. Especially when we're only getting 3 actual BDs.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 10083648)
Yes, it is, when you consider that they're:
- catalog releases - barebones - below-average bd transfers - theatrical versions - bundled together - they're major blockbuster catalogue releases from the past decade that are ~3 hours long each, not some obscure little movies from dozens of years ago - they still have special features, just on separate discs - "barebones" is kind of misleading - only one is a below-average bd transfer - so? - so? $20 per film is still very reasonable. |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
I wasn't going to get this anyway... but it's really disappointing hearing that about the PQ. I swear it's like Warner does this stuff on purpose. It's one thing to crap up DVD releases so people will buy the Blu-ray but to crap the theatrical releases to make the extended ones look better... not cool.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
You're of course assuming they won't botch the extended cut release as well.
I don't see malicious intent here. Just incompetence. |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Does anyone know when or even if we will see the extended editions on Blu-ray?
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by Commander Dan
(Post 10085958)
Does anyone know when or even if we will see the extended editions on Blu-ray?
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
I was considering picking up this set during a sale, but since reviews of the first film's picture quality are negative, I'll just wait for the extended edition set. Hopefully the picture quality of Fellowship will be improved.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
I was in my local B.J.'s this morning, and this was already on the shelves for sale.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Anyone else seeing the same thing lately when ordering on Saturday?
Amazon's release day delivery guarantee has been working great for me since they started it a few months ago. As long as I met the deadline of the pre-order, I always got everything on Tuesday. However, that's not the case anymore. I could even order on Monday morning, choose 2-day release day delivery, and I'd still get everything the next day. I took these screen shots this morning for the LOTR listing. I'm not buying it, but wanted to show everyone what I'm seeing and was wondering if others are seeing this as well. The same thing happened to me on Sherlock Holmes. I got the title on Wednesday, even though I ordered it the Saturday before, which, according to Amazon's listing, was in plenty of time to get it on Tuesday. I know it's just a 1 day difference, but if they're giving release day delivery, I better get it on release day. Check this out: http://i860.photobucket.com/albums/a...azon-prime.png http://i860.photobucket.com/albums/a...rc-bd/cart.png Huh? |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by jackson walker
(Post 10086227)
I was in my local B.J.'s this morning, and this was already on the shelves for sale.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
(Post 10086420)
are you going to tell us the price?
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
The instore US price has got to be lower than I'm seeing on here... we never get good deals in Canada and this is will be selling everywhere locally for $49.99.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Of course Canada get the good deal.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
(Post 10086420)
are you going to tell us the price?
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by doctorthodt
(Post 10085470)
$20 per film is still very reasonable.
My average cost per title in 2010 is $10.76 and I've purchased 50 titles (47 being individual films, 3 being box sets). The highest priced box set I paid for was the Planet of the Apes: 40th Anniversary Collection which was $45. Divide that by five films in the set and we're at $9 per film. Each disc filled with bonus features, some exclusive to the Blu-ray set. The highest priced single title I paid for is a tie between Black Dynamite and Ninja Assassin for $25 because I was simply impatient and needed them now. I'm fine with my extended edition DVD sets of the trilogy and I wouldn't double-dip until I can score the extended edition Blu-rays, with ALL of its bonus material, for under $50. |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
(Post 10086419)
Anyone else seeing the same thing lately when ordering on Saturday?
Amazon's release day delivery guarantee has been working great for me since they started it a few months ago. As long as I met the deadline of the pre-order, I always got everything on Tuesday. However, that's not the case anymore. I could even order on Monday morning, choose 2-day release day delivery, and I'd still get everything the next day. I took these screen shots this morning for the LOTR listing. I'm not buying it, but wanted to show everyone what I'm seeing and was wondering if others are seeing this as well. The same thing happened to me on Sherlock Holmes. I got the title on Wednesday, even though I ordered it the Saturday before, which, according to Amazon's listing, was in plenty of time to get it on Tuesday. I know it's just a 1 day difference, but if they're giving release day delivery, I better get it on release day. Check this out: http://i860.photobucket.com/albums/a...azon-prime.png http://i860.photobucket.com/albums/a...rc-bd/cart.png Huh? |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
$20 per movie is "reasonable" as far as being priced the same as every other catalog title that's been released lately. That's pretty standard across the board, give or take a couple bucks. I think that's all that people are saying.
Obviously bargain hunters that routinely count their averages won't buy it at that price, but what other brand new catalog release have had pricing under $15? |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
(Post 10086419)
Anyone else seeing the same thing lately when ordering on Saturday?
Amazon's release day delivery guarantee has been working great for me since they started it a few months ago. As long as I met the deadline of the pre-order, I always got everything on Tuesday. However, that's not the case anymore. I could even order on Monday morning, choose 2-day release day delivery, and I'd still get everything the next day. I took these screen shots this morning for the LOTR listing. I'm not buying it, but wanted to show everyone what I'm seeing and was wondering if others are seeing this as well. The same thing happened to me on Sherlock Holmes. I got the title on Wednesday, even though I ordered it the Saturday before, which, according to Amazon's listing, was in plenty of time to get it on Tuesday. I know it's just a 1 day difference, but if they're giving release day delivery, I better get it on release day. Check this out: http://i860.photobucket.com/albums/a...azon-prime.png http://i860.photobucket.com/albums/a...rc-bd/cart.png Huh? http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u...y_delivery.jpg |
Originally Posted by fumanstan
(Post 10086921)
$20 per movie is "reasonable" as far as being priced the same as every other catalog title that's been released lately. That's pretty standard across the board, give or take a couple bucks. I think that's all that people are saying.
Obviously bargain hunters that routinely count their averages won't buy it at that price, but what other brand new catalog release have had pricing under $15? Edit: The new catalog release, The Thomas Crown Affair (1999), is just $11.99 for a two disc BD/DVD set at Amazon. Perhaps we will see more reasonable priced catalog releases. |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by fumanstan
(Post 10086913)
I ordered Sherlock Holmes last Saturday and managed to get it release day.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Well my local Fry's has it for $59.** so I'll probably pick it up there. Best buy is selling it for $74.** and you can forget it at that price. $60 tops was my margin and I'll head toward Fry's in the morning.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by Teremei
(Post 10089914)
Well my local Fry's has it for $59.** so I'll probably pick it up there. Best buy is selling it for $74.** and you can forget it at that price. $60 tops was my margin and I'll head toward Fry's in the morning.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Ah I see so she looked at the wrong one, ok. Well I have to go to Fry's anyway but thanks for clearing that up.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by Yavin
(Post 10082508)
^ I still remember paying ~$25 per TE DVD when they were first released. In comparison, getting each film on BD for $6 apiece is ridiculous.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
So are the 3 Bonus Feature DVDs the same ones that came with the original DVDs?
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by Snowmaker
(Post 10091236)
So are the 3 Bonus Feature DVDs the same ones that came with the original DVDs?
Personally, since I have all 3 TEs on DVD, I would rather they have just done away with the 6 DVDs in the set. |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
yeah it feels like a rip off since I don't care to watch the extras again, and especially not in standard DEF. And 3 extra discs for digital copies? Just give me the 3 movie discs in superb HD quality, and it looks like they couldn't even get that done.
And just by the fact that these do look better than the DVDs, and the audio is deffinatly better. I'm STILL considering getting it. I mean how likely is it they will release another TC with the video done right this time? Should I wait out for that? Because I actually love the TC of the fellowship much better than the EE. |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by Teremei
(Post 10091337)
I mean how likely is it they will release another TC with the video done right this time? Should I wait out for that? Because I actually love the TC of the fellowship much better than the EE.
I'm with you. It's pretty much the only reason I bought these. I love the beginning of FOTR much more than in the EE. Can't wait to watch it tonight. |
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
Originally Posted by Teremei
(Post 10091337)
I mean how likely is it they will release another TC with the video done right this time? Should I wait out for that? Because I actually love the TC of the fellowship much better than the EE.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
I will wait for the EEs and hope for a better transfer. I was watching RoTK EE on PS3, and it still looks damn good in 480p.
|
Re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!
So for the people that did buy this,what is your conclusion on the transfer? How about the audio side of it? I felt that the audio transfer of the SD versions(especially FOTR) was outstanding! How does the BD version compare?
|
Originally Posted by SUPERMANROB
(Post 10091548)
So for the people that did buy this,what is your conclusion on the transfer? How about the audio side of it? I felt that the audio transfer of the SD versions(especially FOTR) was outstanding! How does the BD version compare?
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy: Theatrical Editions (Blu-ray) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.