DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   HD Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/hd-talk-55/)
-   -   Why aren't all HD discs significantly better than SD? (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/hd-talk/523197-why-arent-all-hd-discs-significantly-better-than-sd.html)

dkny75 01-24-08 10:33 AM


Originally Posted by Havok83
I got Species on Blu bc of hte 5 free deal and the picture quality is horrible. It doesnt look HD at all

Species is one of Sony's earlier Blu-rays and it's known that the transfer isn't the best in the world.

Dr. Henry Jones, Jr. 01-24-08 10:48 AM

because HD is a scam

Knives 01-24-08 06:51 PM

Your blind!

aynrandgirl 01-26-08 09:23 AM

Doesn't the encoding scheme matter? As I understand it even at high bit rates MPEG-2 is visibly inferior (artifacts) to AVC and VC-1, and many early Blu-Ray releases used MPEG-2 because their authoring tools weren't up to snuff.

Josh Z 01-26-08 09:58 AM


Originally Posted by aynrandgirl
Doesn't the encoding scheme matter? As I understand it even at high bit rates MPEG-2 is visibly inferior (artifacts) to AVC and VC-1, and many early Blu-Ray releases used MPEG-2 because their authoring tools weren't up to snuff.

If given enough room to breathe, MPEG2 is perfectly capable of great picture quality. Kingdom of Heaven and Black Hawk Down are a couple of "reference" discs using MPEG2. The problem with early Blu-rays is that they weren't given enough room to breathe, and the people authoring the discs didn't pay enough attention to the quality of the work they were doing.

The compression codec used is much less important than the competence of the operator doing the encoding. It's just a spec, and it's not worth getting obsessed about. What matters are results, not specs.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.