![]() |
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Let me make it clear that if I ever step over my bounds, a mod would let me know. However, I don't get into personal attacks over something as stupid as a format war
and if I've personally offended anyone here, feel free to email me or PM me and tell me that I've hurt your feelings. ... To those who clearly call me out or have some childish vendetta against me, I say "welcome to my ignore list." Carry on. Make up your mind for once. PM has been off on this board for years, btw. |
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
It's coincidence that the two members I've banned have been Blu-ray supporters. There's no grand conspiracy. The rabid HD DVD folks bug me about as much, but there haven't been any that consistently crossed the line, and I get far, far, far fewer 'report this post to a moderator...' complaints about them.
|
Originally Posted by Jay G.
That's a really good article that summarizes the technical differences, as well as saying whether the differences are relevant or not.
However, I do have a few minor quibbles with the article. First, the author writes too much about dual-sided HD-DVDs as a feature advantage of that format. He writes about dual-sided double-layer HD-DVDs already existing, when the hybrid HD-DVD/DVD discs are actually only single-layer on the HD-DVD side. Also, I don't think there's anything preventing BD from making double-sided discs. Studios don't seem enamoured over a DL/DS HD-DVD in any case, since MI3 is going to be two discs instead of double-sided. Also, the author is overly optomistic about the future pricing of HD-DVD and Blu-Ray... |
Originally Posted by namja
I agree with Evan that "there is plenty of room for both of them in the marketplace, and there is no reason for either one to monopolize it."
unless a dual-format player comes out, there's zero reason to have two formats. And even if a DF player comes out, there's still no reason. :) |
Originally Posted by Jay G.
Also, I don't think there's anything preventing BD from making double-sided discs.
Does anyone remember this? I dont remember where I read that. Probably on avs. |
Vague memory of something like, 'the depth is all wrong for dual sided'. Although that was true for CD, but they managed to make Dual-disc, anyway.
|
Originally Posted by Spiky
Vague memory of something like, 'the depth is all wrong for dual sided'. Although that was true for CD, but they managed to make Dual-disc, anyway.
They are having enough trouble with double-layered right now, so attempting double-sided might be a feat. |
Also, vague memory of it not being an issue. Supposedly they can do 8 layers on one side, so who needs another side? Still waiting for 2 layers to work, of course.
|
Originally Posted by Burnt Thru
The first is that there are very few BD fans bothering to post on this site anymore
As I've said before, I'm not anti-Blu-ray, and I don't champion HD DVD. If the quality of Blu-ray's hardware and software get to where they should be, I'll be first in line when the quality stuff is available. It's just that that hasn't happened yet, and the arrogance of some people in the Blu-ray camp has made that format seem all the less appealing.
Originally Posted by Burnt Thru
It's an ugly thing, and may partially explain the lack of insider participation on this site.
Originally Posted by Spiky
They never have before, why would they now? (at least not Adam)
|
Originally Posted by Jay G.
Finally, I'm not as optomistic as the author that having two formats is actually a good thing. Studios may have released FF and WS versions of DVD, but that doesn't translate to them being "happy to" do it. Consumers also aren't going to be happy either buying both formats or choosing between studios they want to watch. Even if all studios suport both formats, there's still going to be confusion on which format is "best" to buy, especially since by that point the differences may be minimal.
And the prices would have to drop *a lot* for people other than fanatics or enthusiasts to buy both sets of hardware, so the price competition may not be as strong as it is when lots of products are competing for the same audience. As a semi-interested enthusiast, and hopefully educated consumer, I would definitely prefer one format to choose from, with lots of players and titles to choose from. and yeah, I think there is baiting/trolling/flaming on all sides, though maybe to different extents. |
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
I also remember MS saying they would have 3 million by the end of last year. That didnt happen. Didnt they end up with 1 million or so??
I highly doubt we will see 2 million PS3s by the end of the year. As usual, they are being optimistic. |
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I've posted quite a few "hey, cut it out"s after DNY's posts. I agree that perhaps I should have done more. I'm as sick of the baiting and bickering as anyone. As I said, feel free to call me out if I say something inappropriate (via email, if possible). Although I appreciate the love, I'm not here to cause any more problems than are necessary. ;) |
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I've posted quite a few "hey, cut it out"s after DNY's posts. I agree that perhaps I should have done more. I'm as sick of the baiting and bickering as anyone.
|
:grouphug:
;) |
Originally Posted by HiFiLux
I believe that the charts MS released show about 5 million for the end of the year. They have been on the market about 8 months I think.
This year, they plan to have sold 10 million by the end of the year. Who knows if they will reach that. EDIT: They shipped 1.3 million by the end of last year. They planned 2.75 million though in the first 3 months. http://www.xb360info.com/xbox/news/257 http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/01...0_hibernation/ |
Originally Posted by The Bus
dt: That chart is not 100% correct.
I do have a question though: Doesn't Weinstein Company own Dimension? Among the corrections I would note: 1) The list of Audio formats makes no distinction as to what is mandatory in the players of each format, vs "optional". HD DVD players are required to have DD, DTS, DD+, TruHD decoders (DTS-HD is optional). Blurya is required to have only DD an DTS. As a result, far more HD DVD releases have the advanced audio codec soundtracks, since studios know all players will support them. 2) Obviously 25 Gigs Single Layer is what Bluray is stuck at now, since they have been having massive problems getting reliable and efficient proiduction of dual layer. 3) The Bluray hybrid discs with DVD and Bluray layers is a complete myth. It was talked about in the early days, but TDK or JVC was unable to get the thing to work and it was abandoned. It is in the spec as just a fantasy right now. |
Originally Posted by HiFiLux
2) Obviously 25 Gigs Single Layer is what Bluray is stuck at now, since they have been having massive problems getting reliable and efficient proiduction of dual layer. |
Originally Posted by Giles
if that's true, that doesn't bode well.
|
Originally Posted by HiFiLux
The Bluray hybrid discs with DVD and Bluray layers is a complete myth. It was talked about in the early days, but TDK or JVC was unable to get the thing to work and it was abandoned. It is in the spec as just a fantasy right now.
|
Btw...here's a bit of news. I had speculated this a while back and now it's looking to be true.
You know that diode shortage that's affecting the BD community? Yeah. Guess who bought all those up a while back? ;) |
I thought it had already been confirmed that MS stockpiled a while back and now they're doling them out to everything that says "HD DVD" on it.
|
Blu-Ray equals Death Ray
September 7, 2006 Sony's Playstation 3 will not be released for the all-important Christmas season in Europe, the UK, Russia, and Austral-Asia because of production shortages of the Blu-ray laser diodes. You can hear the sounds of glee coming out of Redmond already. Sony can only make half as many of the 7kg PS3 units as it wanted and these are going to Japan and, by ship, to the USA, both regions which use the NTSC video standard and not the PAL standard used elsewhere. It's not the first time Sony has delayed the PlayStation 3 launch, again due to Blu-ray problems. But the stakes this time are immeasurably higher. Microsoft already has its Xbox 360 out and the competing Toshiba-led HD-DVD high-definition optical disc product is going to have a relatively clear run in the European market. A Nintendo Wii console will be a launched later this year giving PS3 added market competition. Toshiba aims to launch its first HD-DVD players in Europe on November 15, with a second player to be released in December. Tosh officials have claimed that more than 10,000 units will be shipped to Europe for the November launch. Coming after the Dell and Apple Lithium-Iron Sony battery recalls the company's reputation is taking a beating and Sir Howard Stringer could be forgiven for polishing up his CV. Sony promises PS3 availability for the rest of the world outside Japan and the USA for March. It will have to be outstandingly better at both graphics and games performance to overcome this sales problem. There is now a strong chance, a very strong chance, that HD-DVD will wipe out Blu-ray as a high-definition format and that Sony will become an also-ran Japanese electronics company. http://www.techworld.com/storage/blo...=3&entryid=249 Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:29:50 AM ET Dow Jones Newswires 1209 GMT [Dow Jones] The delayed launch of Sony's (SNE) Playstation 3 could have a negative impact on Singulus (SNG.XE), says analyst. Playstation runs on the Blu-Ray DVD standard, one of Singulus's key business ares with the potential to be highly profitable, he says. But the delay could cause more customers to buy Microsoft's (MSFT) X-Box gamestation instead, which runs on the HD-DVD standard. If Blu-Ray as a result isn't able to snag a significant share of the market from HD-DVD due to the Playstation delay, "this would be a real setback for Singulus," he says. "I'm puzzled that the market has barely reacted to the news," he says, pointing to Singulus shares which trade -0.3% at EUR9.95. (MOD/HAD) |
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
But the delay could cause more customers to buy Microsoft's (MSFT) X-Box gamestation instead, which runs on the HD-DVD standard.
|
Heh, it's funny to watch financial analysts try to figure out video games.
|
What the fuck is a gamestation?
|
Is it the same thing as an Okama Gamesphere?
|
Originally Posted by XavierMike
Is it the same thing as an Okama Gamesphere?
|
Originally Posted by candyrocket786
What the fuck is a gamestation?
|
I used to mention that it should be called Blu-ray Disc, because DVD is trademarked by the DVD Forum, but no one listened. :(
|
Originally Posted by Drexl
I'm still wondering what "Blu-Ray DVD" is.
|
The DVD Forum could all retire happy just sueing for trademark violation at this point. :)
|
No, they couldn't, because it's not the BDA who is using the name. Maybe they could sue Best Buy, but I don't think they'd get very far, nor would they want to, since Best Buy could just decide that HD DVD isn't worth carrying anymore.
|
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Supposedly they've gotten the yields up to 80% now...but...could be bullshit.
|
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
In fairness, though, that street runs both ways; HD DVD would've been a much, much less attractive format if not for the spectre of Blu-ray.
|
At the risk of "crying wolf" again...it looks like something "big" may be happening again tonight at midnight.
Joystiq is hyping this little nugget on their website currently: "We just got handed a scoop for some important news with one of the next-generation consoles. We can't talk about any specifics yet, but you have our word that this announcement is something worth waiting for." The "news" is to be posted at 12:01AM tonight. Given the influence of both consoles on in the format war, I was wondering if anyone was willing to leak the leak? Or at least throw a hint? Corporate VP Holmdahl says the 360 will be reduced yearly as the price war hots[sic] up even before launch Having lost almost $4 billion on launching the Xbox, Microsoft aims to break even within two years with the Xbox 360. And in another aggressive move, the company is stating it is committed to reducing the price of its new machine on a yearly basis. Speaking to Reuters, Todd Holmdahl, corporate vice president of the Xbox product group stated: "We will wind up cost-reducing the product every year," and given the use of licensing technology rather than buying off the shelf components, Microsoft should easily be in a position to do so. |
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
At the risk of "crying wolf" again...it looks like something "big" may be happening again tonight at midnight.
Which could have something to do with this... |
I would be quite surprised if it were the pricing/release date on the Wii, as Nintendo is holding a press conference in about a week.
|
Interesting. Few thoughts on various posts.
I had a feeling MS was stockpiling diodes away. :) The 80% BD50 yield number, with only three announced titles by November? Put my vote on the bullshit button. |
It's probably MS. It's not Sony's style to contact Joystiq or Kotaku.
|
Originally Posted by The Bus
It's probably MS. It's not Sony's style to contact Joystiq or Kotaku.
err...the announcement was that the Wii chip production is well underway say Nintendo and IBM. Joystiq has posted on their website an apology for generating excitement to heh. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.