DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   HD Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/hd-talk-55/)
-   -   HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray vs. everything else free-for-all: Round two (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/hd-talk/473978-hd-dvd-vs-blu-ray-vs-everything-else-free-all-round-two.html)

Spiky 09-07-06 12:24 PM


Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Let me make it clear that if I ever step over my bounds, a mod would let me know. However, I don't get into personal attacks over something as stupid as a format war

They never have before, why would they now? (at least not Adam) As an example, about half the posts you made responding to me this year have been personal attacks. Then you get all wiggy when I respond in kind. News flash, people don't like being called idiot, foolish and all the other (apparently minor, is that ok then?) insults you favor.


and if I've personally offended anyone here, feel free to email me or PM me and tell me that I've hurt your feelings.
...
To those who clearly call me out or have some childish vendetta against me, I say "welcome to my ignore list."

Carry on.
:rolleyes:
Make up your mind for once. PM has been off on this board for years, btw.

Burnt Thru 09-07-06 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
It's coincidence that the two members I've banned have been Blu-ray supporters. There's no grand conspiracy. The rabid HD DVD folks bug me about as much, but there haven't been any that consistently crossed the line, and I get far, far, far fewer 'report this post to a moderator...' complaints about them.

There are two obvious reasons for that. The first is that there are very few BD fans bothering to post on this site anymore, while the second is that there's no point complaining if nothing is going to be done about it. There was clearly concerted baiting of Blitz on this forum, much of it outside this "free-for-all" thread. It's an ugly thing, and may partially explain the lack of insider participation on this site.

namja 09-07-06 12:32 PM


Originally Posted by Jay G.
That's a really good article that summarizes the technical differences, as well as saying whether the differences are relevant or not.

However, I do have a few minor quibbles with the article. First, the author writes too much about dual-sided HD-DVDs as a feature advantage of that format. He writes about dual-sided double-layer HD-DVDs already existing, when the hybrid HD-DVD/DVD discs are actually only single-layer on the HD-DVD side. Also, I don't think there's anything preventing BD from making double-sided discs. Studios don't seem enamoured over a DL/DS HD-DVD in any case, since MI3 is going to be two discs instead of double-sided.

Agree on that. Dual-sided is highly overrated. I'd much rather have two single-sided discs than one double-sided disc.



Also, the author is overly optomistic about the future pricing of HD-DVD and Blu-Ray...
Perhaps. But just remember that about a year ago, everyone thought that HD DVD was dead, and look how it fluorished. I agree with Evan that "there is plenty of room for both of them in the marketplace, and there is no reason for either one to monopolize it."

digitalfreaknyc 09-07-06 12:35 PM


Originally Posted by namja
I agree with Evan that "there is plenty of room for both of them in the marketplace, and there is no reason for either one to monopolize it."

Obviously I'd have to respectfully disagree.

unless a dual-format player comes out, there's zero reason to have two formats.

And even if a DF player comes out, there's still no reason. :)

RockStrongo 09-07-06 12:38 PM


Originally Posted by Jay G.
Also, I don't think there's anything preventing BD from making double-sided discs.

I thought that I read somewhere that double sided BD discs was impossible due to some technical limitation. Thickness maybe?

Does anyone remember this? I dont remember where I read that. Probably on avs.

Spiky 09-07-06 12:41 PM

Vague memory of something like, 'the depth is all wrong for dual sided'. Although that was true for CD, but they managed to make Dual-disc, anyway.

RockStrongo 09-07-06 12:43 PM


Originally Posted by Spiky
Vague memory of something like, 'the depth is all wrong for dual sided'. Although that was true for CD, but they managed to make Dual-disc, anyway.

Yeah, I think it had to do with the thickness of the coating.

They are having enough trouble with double-layered right now, so attempting double-sided might be a feat.

Spiky 09-07-06 12:49 PM

Also, vague memory of it not being an issue. Supposedly they can do 8 layers on one side, so who needs another side? Still waiting for 2 layers to work, of course.

Adam Tyner 09-07-06 12:51 PM


Originally Posted by Burnt Thru
The first is that there are very few BD fans bothering to post on this site anymore

I don't think we lost much, if any, readership, though. There were quite a few vocal Blu-ray supporters; it's just that many of them are now HD DVD supporters.

As I've said before, I'm not anti-Blu-ray, and I don't champion HD DVD. If the quality of Blu-ray's hardware and software get to where they should be, I'll be first in line when the quality stuff is available. It's just that that hasn't happened yet, and the arrogance of some people in the Blu-ray camp has made that format seem all the less appealing.


Originally Posted by Burnt Thru
It's an ugly thing, and may partially explain the lack of insider participation on this site.

DVD Talk as a whole has very little insider participation. I doubt the atmosphere here has anything to do with it. It's just that there are more popular, more established HD-centric message boards where those insiders were already participating.


Originally Posted by Spiky
They never have before, why would they now? (at least not Adam)

I've posted quite a few "hey, cut it out"s after DNY's posts. I agree that perhaps I should have done more. I'm as sick of the baiting and bickering as anyone.

tonyc3742 09-07-06 12:52 PM


Originally Posted by Jay G.
Finally, I'm not as optomistic as the author that having two formats is actually a good thing. Studios may have released FF and WS versions of DVD, but that doesn't translate to them being "happy to" do it. Consumers also aren't going to be happy either buying both formats or choosing between studios they want to watch. Even if all studios suport both formats, there's still going to be confusion on which format is "best" to buy, especially since by that point the differences may be minimal.

agreed. Especially since, for the past few years at least, you could get the FF or WS version of a disk for about the same price, and play them both on the same player, which you could get for less than 200 bucks. And there's a difference between being forced to buy FF or WS, if that was the only version, and still being able to play it, versus not being able to watch The Fifth Element in high definition because you've only got a 500$ HD player, and not a 1000$ BD player. I think part of the speedy success of DVD, apart from the PS2 and its pricing, was the fact that it was reasonably easy to use, and you knew what you were getting; they would work with pretty much any TV, and if you bought a "DVD" in a US store, there was 99.99% chance it would play on your dvd player. Having a format, that requires a large chunk of initial investment outlay to even use, then requiring people to either choose one format and be limited to only certain movies, or buy two pieces of hardware for triple the cost of just one to be able to access the whole library, is a barrier to either format's widespread acceptance, imho.
And the prices would have to drop *a lot* for people other than fanatics or enthusiasts to buy both sets of hardware, so the price competition may not be as strong as it is when lots of products are competing for the same audience. As a semi-interested enthusiast, and hopefully educated consumer, I would definitely prefer one format to choose from, with lots of players and titles to choose from.
and yeah, I think there is baiting/trolling/flaming on all sides, though maybe to different extents.

HiFiLux 09-07-06 12:53 PM


Originally Posted by RockStrongo
I also remember MS saying they would have 3 million by the end of last year. That didnt happen. Didnt they end up with 1 million or so??

I highly doubt we will see 2 million PS3s by the end of the year. As usual, they are being optimistic.

I believe that the charts MS released show about 5 million for the end of the year. They have been on the market about 8 months I think.

digitalfreaknyc 09-07-06 01:00 PM


Originally Posted by Adam Tyner

I've posted quite a few "hey, cut it out"s after DNY's posts. I agree that perhaps I should have done more. I'm as sick of the baiting and bickering as anyone.

Adam,

As I said, feel free to call me out if I say something inappropriate (via email, if possible). Although I appreciate the love, I'm not here to cause any more problems than are necessary. ;)

Spiky 09-07-06 01:00 PM


Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I've posted quite a few "hey, cut it out"s after DNY's posts. I agree that perhaps I should have done more. I'm as sick of the baiting and bickering as anyone.

We discussed it outside. I don't think you'll see any more problems between us. At least, we'll try.

bboisvert 09-07-06 01:03 PM

:grouphug:


;)

RockStrongo 09-07-06 01:04 PM


Originally Posted by HiFiLux
I believe that the charts MS released show about 5 million for the end of the year. They have been on the market about 8 months I think.

I was talking about last year. I could have sworn that they stated 3 million or so would be shipped before Jan 06...but production problems hampered that and I dont think they even shipped 1 million before that time.

This year, they plan to have sold 10 million by the end of the year. Who knows if they will reach that.

EDIT: They shipped 1.3 million by the end of last year. They planned 2.75 million though in the first 3 months.

http://www.xb360info.com/xbox/news/257
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/01...0_hibernation/

HiFiLux 09-07-06 01:06 PM


Originally Posted by The Bus
dt: That chart is not 100% correct.

I do have a question though: Doesn't Weinstein Company own Dimension?

Yes, that chart is Old, and is based on a lot of the hoopla from before the launch of both formats - and before everyone realized how far off the promise some things were.

Among the corrections I would note:

1) The list of Audio formats makes no distinction as to what is mandatory in the players of each format, vs "optional". HD DVD players are required to have DD, DTS, DD+, TruHD decoders (DTS-HD is optional). Blurya is required to have only DD an DTS. As a result, far more HD DVD releases have the advanced audio codec soundtracks, since studios know all players will support them.

2) Obviously 25 Gigs Single Layer is what Bluray is stuck at now, since they have been having massive problems getting reliable and efficient proiduction of dual layer.

3) The Bluray hybrid discs with DVD and Bluray layers is a complete myth. It was talked about in the early days, but TDK or JVC was unable to get the thing to work and it was abandoned. It is in the spec as just a fantasy right now.

Giles 09-07-06 01:34 PM


Originally Posted by HiFiLux

2) Obviously 25 Gigs Single Layer is what Bluray is stuck at now, since they have been having massive problems getting reliable and efficient proiduction of dual layer.

if that's true, that doesn't bode well.

digitalfreaknyc 09-07-06 02:06 PM


Originally Posted by Giles
if that's true, that doesn't bode well.

Supposedly they've gotten the yields up to 80% now...but...could be bullshit.

Supermallet 09-07-06 02:48 PM


Originally Posted by HiFiLux
The Bluray hybrid discs with DVD and Bluray layers is a complete myth. It was talked about in the early days, but TDK or JVC was unable to get the thing to work and it was abandoned. It is in the spec as just a fantasy right now.

Actually, even if they got them to work, they would never see the light of day as they incorporate DVD technology and the BDA is not part of the DVD Forum, so it would be grounds for a major lawsuit against the BDA.

digitalfreaknyc 09-07-06 02:52 PM

Btw...here's a bit of news. I had speculated this a while back and now it's looking to be true.

You know that diode shortage that's affecting the BD community?

Yeah.

Guess who bought all those up a while back? ;)

Supermallet 09-07-06 03:00 PM

I thought it had already been confirmed that MS stockpiled a while back and now they're doling them out to everything that says "HD DVD" on it.

digitalfreaknyc 09-07-06 03:00 PM

Blu-Ray equals Death Ray
September 7, 2006
Sony's Playstation 3 will not be released for the all-important Christmas season in Europe, the UK, Russia, and Austral-Asia because of production shortages of the Blu-ray laser diodes. You can hear the sounds of glee coming out of Redmond already. Sony can only make half as many of the 7kg PS3 units as it wanted and these are going to Japan and, by ship, to the USA, both regions which use the NTSC video standard and not the PAL standard used elsewhere.

It's not the first time Sony has delayed the PlayStation 3 launch, again due to Blu-ray problems. But the stakes this time are immeasurably higher. Microsoft already has its Xbox 360 out and the competing Toshiba-led HD-DVD high-definition optical disc product is going to have a relatively clear run in the European market. A Nintendo Wii console will be a launched later this year giving PS3 added market competition.

Toshiba aims to launch its first HD-DVD players in Europe on November 15, with a second player to be released in December. Tosh officials have claimed that more than 10,000 units will be shipped to Europe for the November launch.

Coming after the Dell and Apple Lithium-Iron Sony battery recalls the company's reputation is taking a beating and Sir Howard Stringer could be forgiven for polishing up his CV.

Sony promises PS3 availability for the rest of the world outside Japan and the USA for March. It will have to be outstandingly better at both graphics and games performance to overcome this sales problem. There is now a strong chance, a very strong chance, that HD-DVD will wipe out Blu-ray as a high-definition format and that Sony will become an also-ran Japanese electronics company.

http://www.techworld.com/storage/blo...=3&entryid=249


Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:29:50 AM ET
Dow Jones Newswires

1209 GMT [Dow Jones] The delayed launch of Sony's (SNE) Playstation 3 could have a negative impact on Singulus (SNG.XE), says analyst. Playstation runs on the Blu-Ray DVD standard, one of Singulus's key business ares with the potential to be highly profitable, he says. But the delay could cause more customers to buy Microsoft's (MSFT) X-Box gamestation instead, which runs on the HD-DVD standard. If Blu-Ray as a result isn't able to snag a significant share of the market from HD-DVD due to the Playstation delay, "this would be a real setback for Singulus," he says. "I'm puzzled that the market has barely reacted to the news," he says, pointing to Singulus shares which trade -0.3% at EUR9.95. (MOD/HAD)
http://www.newratings.com/analyst_ne...e_1363083.html

The Bus 09-07-06 03:13 PM


Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
But the delay could cause more customers to buy Microsoft's (MSFT) X-Box gamestation instead, which runs on the HD-DVD standard.

This phrase automatically negates anything else that tidbit might say.

Supermallet 09-07-06 03:23 PM

Heh, it's funny to watch financial analysts try to figure out video games.

candyrocket786 09-07-06 03:39 PM

What the fuck is a gamestation?

XavierMike 09-07-06 03:40 PM

Is it the same thing as an Okama Gamesphere?

pinata242 09-07-06 03:42 PM


Originally Posted by XavierMike
Is it the same thing as an Okama Gamesphere?

I hear the parachuting level on that is way cooler than real life, which is just something to get in the way of returning to your game.

Drexl 09-07-06 03:55 PM


Originally Posted by candyrocket786
What the fuck is a gamestation?

I'm still wondering what "Blu-Ray DVD" is.

Supermallet 09-07-06 03:56 PM

I used to mention that it should be called Blu-ray Disc, because DVD is trademarked by the DVD Forum, but no one listened. :(

RockStrongo 09-07-06 04:00 PM


Originally Posted by Drexl
I'm still wondering what "Blu-Ray DVD" is.

According to Best Buy, its the "Next Generation of DVD!!".

bboisvert 09-07-06 04:01 PM

The DVD Forum could all retire happy just sueing for trademark violation at this point. :)

Supermallet 09-07-06 04:03 PM

No, they couldn't, because it's not the BDA who is using the name. Maybe they could sue Best Buy, but I don't think they'd get very far, nor would they want to, since Best Buy could just decide that HD DVD isn't worth carrying anymore.

Spiky 09-07-06 04:21 PM


Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Supposedly they've gotten the yields up to 80% now...but...could be bullshit.

From 5% to 80%? Not bad if true.

DthRdrX 09-07-06 04:30 PM


Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
In fairness, though, that street runs both ways; HD DVD would've been a much, much less attractive format if not for the spectre of Blu-ray.

You got my point Adam. Both formats were terrible 3 years ago in the early development stages. Red Laser formats using MPEG-2 on dvd9s. lol.

digitalfreaknyc 09-07-06 04:38 PM

At the risk of "crying wolf" again...it looks like something "big" may be happening again tonight at midnight.


Joystiq is hyping this little nugget on their website currently:

"We just got handed a scoop for some important news with one of the next-generation consoles. We can't talk about any specifics yet, but you have our word that this announcement is something worth waiting for."

The "news" is to be posted at 12:01AM tonight. Given the influence of both consoles on in the format war, I was wondering if anyone was willing to leak the leak? Or at least throw a hint?
Which could have something to do with this...


Corporate VP Holmdahl says the 360 will be reduced yearly as the price war hots[sic] up even before launch

Having lost almost $4 billion on launching the Xbox, Microsoft aims to break even within two years with the Xbox 360. And in another aggressive move, the company is stating it is committed to reducing the price of its new machine on a yearly basis. Speaking to Reuters, Todd Holmdahl, corporate vice president of the Xbox product group stated: "We will wind up cost-reducing the product every year," and given the use of licensing technology rather than buying off the shelf components, Microsoft should easily be in a position to do so.

ShagMan 09-07-06 04:45 PM


Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
At the risk of "crying wolf" again...it looks like something "big" may be happening again tonight at midnight.



Which could have something to do with this...

It's going to be the pricing/details on the Nintendo Wii, sorry.

Supermallet 09-07-06 04:49 PM

I would be quite surprised if it were the pricing/release date on the Wii, as Nintendo is holding a press conference in about a week.

DthRdrX 09-07-06 04:58 PM

Interesting. Few thoughts on various posts.

I had a feeling MS was stockpiling diodes away. :)

The 80% BD50 yield number, with only three announced titles by November? Put my vote on the bullshit button.

The Bus 09-07-06 05:11 PM

It's probably MS. It's not Sony's style to contact Joystiq or Kotaku.

Zman 09-08-06 12:16 AM


Originally Posted by The Bus
It's probably MS. It's not Sony's style to contact Joystiq or Kotaku.


err...the announcement was that the Wii chip production is well underway say Nintendo and IBM.

Joystiq has posted on their website an apology for generating excitement to heh.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.