![]() |
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
Originally Posted by Overpar
(Post 9376938)
So here is the new cover... -rolleyes-
http://images.dvdempire.com/gen/movies/1461147h.jpg |
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
Originally Posted by The Reaper
(Post 9377933)
With a hint of Jason Voorhees.
|
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 9376970)
Yikes! That is one ugly cover! Get the old one while it lasts, eh? That exo-skull isn't even accurate to the production. Ugh.
|
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
I'll hold off for the rumored special edition. I have the SE on DVD, that'll hold me off for a while...
|
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
Originally Posted by MTRodaba2468
(Post 9380844)
I'll hold off for the rumored special edition. I have the SE on DVD, that'll hold me off for a while...
That cover is wicked ugly. |
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
Originally Posted by MTRodaba2468
(Post 9380844)
I'll hold off for the rumored special edition. I have the SE on DVD, that'll hold me off for a while...
|
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
I'm waiting for a new transfer. The skull on this cover looks a little like an alien. Reminds me of Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.
|
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
Reminds me of Ghostrider. Plus the shape is all wrong.
|
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
Originally Posted by Jamers
(Post 9425653)
Reminds me of Ghostrider. Plus the shape is all wrong.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...99_2_cover.jpg |
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
I had hoped with Blu Ray, they'd cut it out with the lame DVD-style covers and start using some poster art or even some of the original artwork associated with the film... Nope, looks like the same interns are still photoshopping these things.
|
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
I'm confused - so there been two version of Terminator (1) on blu, the first one from Sony and then the latest one with the butt ugly lenticular cover from Fox - what's up with the sound? The Sony had uncompressed 5.1 sound, the Fox had 5.1 Dolby Digital (lossless?) and Dolby Digital EX (6.1) sound - granted it's not the film's original mono mix which of the two is actually better - The Sony or Fox soundmixes?
|
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
Originally Posted by Giles
(Post 9509621)
I'm confused - so there been two version of Terminator (1) on blu, the first one from Sony and then the latest one with the butt ugly lenticular cover from Fox - what's up with the sound? The Sony had uncompressed 5.1 sound, the Fox had 5.1 Dolby Digital (lossless?) and Dolby Digital EX (6.1) sound - granted it's not the film's original mono mix which of the two is actually better - The Sony or Fox soundmixes?
|
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
Originally Posted by Giles
(Post 9509621)
I'm confused - so there been two version of Terminator (1) on blu, the first one from Sony and then the latest one with the butt ugly lenticular cover from Fox - what's up with the sound? The Sony had uncompressed 5.1 sound, the Fox had 5.1 Dolby Digital (lossless?) and Dolby Digital EX (6.1) sound - granted it's not the film's original mono mix which of the two is actually better - The Sony or Fox soundmixes?
|
Re: Terminator (Blu-Ray) Review!!!
as my friend informed me, the MGM/Sony release was the first release, when bluray first debuted. MGM's library then migrated over to Fox, where it's noted as such on the newer rerelease. So... is the 6.1 sound encode noted on the back of the slipcover incorrect?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.