Bill Hunt says: Wait
04-19-06, 01:19 PM
#51
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,822
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds
Have we seen any commitment to OAR and a rejection of edited/syndicated/censored features? How come so much good stuff like Wonder Years have not been made available yet? Wouldn't changes in the way that movies and TV shows are owned and distributed leading to far wider availability be much more significant and meaningful for our enjoyment of moving pictures?
Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds
Have you seen Three's Company on DVD? How do you think it will look like on HD?
04-19-06, 04:26 PM
#52
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: In the Universe.
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mbs
Unless the film was mastered poorly, you are totally, utterly, undeniably wrong. Sorry, but film has WAY more resolution than 1080p provides. Certainly a few films might not have a proper negative available for a great master, but making a sweeping claim that older films won't look benefit is absurd.
04-19-06, 04:36 PM
#53
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jiggawhat
Why don't you read the whole sentence? I said unless the studios master them well you won't see a huge difference on older movies.
04-19-06, 05:49 PM
#54
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A far green country
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jiggawhat
Why don't you read the whole sentence? I said unless the studios master them well you won't see a huge difference on older movies.
If you are trying to say that a new master of an older film will look no better than SD, or that making it look better will require more work, I disagree. Any film shot on good quality 35mm contains more than four times the detail of HD, even 1080p. These films, properly mastered, will look amazing on HD-DVD/Blu-ray, regardless of their age. I can't imagine any studio attempting to use an old, non-HD master as the source for a new HD disc. For such cases it stands to reason that a new HD master will be created.
On the other hand, if you are talking about restoration and preservation of older films, that is a totally different matter.
04-19-06, 05:59 PM
#55
Originally Posted by jiggawhat
Why don't you read the whole sentence? I said unless the studios master them well you won't see a huge difference on older movies.
"I will upgrade to HD-DVD/Blu-Ray to buy a few certain titles that will shine on HD-DVD/Blu-Ray (Star Wars, Matrix, LOTR) but I think for the most part many titles older titles will not benefit from HD."
Now. How does that clarify your position? I'm sorry, but it's a silly notion that only newer movies will benefit from HD.
And what studios have not been mastering everything in HD for the past 5 (10?) years? If a release needs a new master, it will be done. And why does the mastering only matter for older movies? Again, that makes no sense. A shitty master will give a shitty transfer regardless of film age. Specifying older movies as a problem makes no sense at all.
Last edited by mbs; 04-19-06 at 06:02 PM.
04-19-06, 07:09 PM
#56
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,822
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds
Believe it or not, the latest hot hits are not the main interest for many of us.
04-19-06, 07:15 PM
#57
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds
Believe it or not, the latest hot hits are not the main interest for many of us.
I never mentioned anything about "hot hits."
And btw? The "movie snob" attitude is getting old.
04-19-06, 07:19 PM
#58
Moderator
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
You're (deliberately?) misinterpreting his message. The studios, big and small alike, have been mastering damn near everything -- from blockbusters like Lord of the Rings down to obscurities like Lemora: A Child's Tale of the Supernatural and never-released-on-DVD films like Night of the Comet for a number of years now. Doesn't matter if it was released in 1964 or this past February: 1080p HD masters have been the industry standard for quite some time.
and even Criterion teases us with their standard DVD are being mastered and restored from High Definition digital transfers.
oh the wait is painful.
04-19-06, 09:10 PM
#59
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,822
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds
May I ask then, what accounts for newer material looking so much better than older stuff?
I've watched well over a hundred movies in high-definition from the mid-'50s on, and the transfers come in all shapes and sizes. I don't see how someone could watch Forbidden Planet in high-definition and say that there's little-to-no difference between the DVD and the HD presentation. Even long-forgotten, lower-budget TV shows like Square Pegs look astonishing in HD.
04-19-06, 09:18 PM
#60
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A far green country
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
Improvements in cameras, lenses, and film stocks, but there's no cut-off point where HD transfers of movies look dramatically better, and there's no reason why older films should inherently look worse than newer ones.
04-19-06, 09:40 PM
#61
DVD Talk Legend
I'm betting the classic films that Warner has restored recently like Gone With the Wind and Wizard of Oz are going to look amazing in HD. I bet the original King Kong might even be worth getting again in HD.
04-19-06, 10:29 PM
#62
DVD Talk God
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
Improvements in cameras, lenses, and film stocks, but there's no cut-off point where HD transfers of movies look dramatically better, and there's no reason why older films should inherently look worse than newer ones.
I've watched well over a hundred movies in high-definition from the mid-'50s on, and the transfers come in all shapes and sizes. I don't see how someone could watch Forbidden Planet in high-definition and say that there's little-to-no difference between the DVD and the HD presentation. Even long-forgotten, lower-budget TV shows like Square Pegs look astonishing in HD.
I've watched well over a hundred movies in high-definition from the mid-'50s on, and the transfers come in all shapes and sizes. I don't see how someone could watch Forbidden Planet in high-definition and say that there's little-to-no difference between the DVD and the HD presentation. Even long-forgotten, lower-budget TV shows like Square Pegs look astonishing in HD.
04-19-06, 11:15 PM
#63
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by mbs
And what studios have not been mastering everything in HD for the past 5 (10?) years?
What really sucks about this is that Image owns Criterion, and Criterion has been mastering in HD, but because the parent company won't support either format neither will Criterion.
04-20-06, 02:42 AM
#64
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
I saw a few minutes of Jaws: The Revenge on Universal's HD channel and it looked amazing. It was only a few minutes because the movie obviously sucks ass.
04-20-06, 06:34 AM
#65
Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Universal HD is usually very good about having it in the right format.
04-20-06, 07:25 AM
#66
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,822
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Originally Posted by johnglad
Universal HD is usually very good about having it in the right format.
04-20-06, 07:30 AM
#67
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,822
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Originally Posted by Josh Z
Image, apparently. Which is why they're not supporting either HD format, citing too much expense in converting to HD mastering.
It may be the case that Image hadn't been transferring their films in HD, but if they weren't, that might make them the largest of those smaller shops not to do so.
04-20-06, 08:16 AM
#68
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by yellowbedwetter
Jaws the Revenge is worth is just for Mario Van Peeble's performance (and death scene) alone!
Unfortunately, the only place to see the original theatrical version is, AFAIK, cable TV.
04-20-06, 11:44 AM
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Peachtree City, GA 30269
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
He doesn't die in the Home Video/Universal HD version.
Unfortunately, the only place to see the original theatrical version is, AFAIK, cable TV.
Unfortunately, the only place to see the original theatrical version is, AFAIK, cable TV.
04-07-09, 10:34 AM
#70
Banned
Re: Bill Hunt says: Wait
I have usually defended Hunt and the Digital Bits, but I'm getting a bit tired of them misinforming people and then not correcting their remarks. Last week, Hunt posted this regarding the cancellation of the Ran Criterion Blu-ray:
I emailed him this, correcting and refuting his statement on the site:
It has been almost 5 days after that post and he hasn't corrected his information or put a retraction on the site. How can he expect for people to take him and his site seriously when he writes stuff that is completely wrong? From now on, I'm going to be taking everything he says with a grain of salt.
Also today, we've learned a little more about Criterion's cancellation of Ran on Blu-ray, but just so you know this is NOT official, so it should be considered Rumor Mill-worthy. It seems that the U.S. home video release rights to the film are owned by Wellspring (who have released it on DVD in the past), the parent company of which is Genius Products, now 70% owned by The Weinstein Company. There have been industry rumors over the last year that Weinstein Co. is in some financial difficulty, so it's possible the Brothers want a better deal with Criterion (i.e. more or too much money) from Criterion to licence the title for Blu-ray. Hopefully, a deal of some kind will be struck soon, because (I'll say again) nobody would do better by this title in high-definition than Criterion. We are SO dying to see Kurosawa films in 1080p...
GNPR acquires 60% of Genius
New owner make take homevid unit private
By DIANE GARRETT
Genius Products, the troubled homevideo distributor majority owned by the Weinstein Co., now has a new majority owner.
GNPR Investments, an affiliate of investment firm Quadrant Management, has acquired 60% of the company. TWC now owns 15% of the company and Genius retains 25% of the company.
The new ownership is part of a restructuring of the homevid distributor, which was delisted by the OTCBB on Dec. 24. The company has renegotiated its distribution terms with TWC.
The company will also renegotiate existing agreements with vendors and content partners. Company may go private.
Under the new ownership by Quadrant, three of the company's directors appointed by TWC resigned and will be replaced with representatives from Quadrant.
TWC remains the biggest content partner for Genius, which also distributes discs from ESPN, Sesame Street, IFC and Animal Planet. The TWC deal will remain through 2010, with an option to extend until a year later.
Bob Weinstein said the new owners will allow him and his brother more time to concentrate on their movie slate.
"We look at this as an ongoing partnership and something that will grow in the future," he said.
New owner make take homevid unit private
By DIANE GARRETT
Genius Products, the troubled homevideo distributor majority owned by the Weinstein Co., now has a new majority owner.
GNPR Investments, an affiliate of investment firm Quadrant Management, has acquired 60% of the company. TWC now owns 15% of the company and Genius retains 25% of the company.
The new ownership is part of a restructuring of the homevid distributor, which was delisted by the OTCBB on Dec. 24. The company has renegotiated its distribution terms with TWC.
The company will also renegotiate existing agreements with vendors and content partners. Company may go private.
Under the new ownership by Quadrant, three of the company's directors appointed by TWC resigned and will be replaced with representatives from Quadrant.
TWC remains the biggest content partner for Genius, which also distributes discs from ESPN, Sesame Street, IFC and Animal Planet. The TWC deal will remain through 2010, with an option to extend until a year later.
Bob Weinstein said the new owners will allow him and his brother more time to concentrate on their movie slate.
"We look at this as an ongoing partnership and something that will grow in the future," he said.
It has been almost 5 days after that post and he hasn't corrected his information or put a retraction on the site. How can he expect for people to take him and his site seriously when he writes stuff that is completely wrong? From now on, I'm going to be taking everything he says with a grain of salt.
04-07-09, 10:41 AM
#71
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Bill Hunt says: Wait
It has been almost 5 days after that post and he hasn't corrected his information or put a retraction on the site. How can he expect for people to take him and his site seriously when he writes stuff that is completely wrong? From now on, I'm going to be taking everything he says with a grain of salt.
04-07-09, 11:00 AM
#74
Banned
Re: Bill Hunt says: Wait
Well, for one, he did just post that he's been unable to update the site for a few days, so a common-courtesy level of benefit-of-the-doubt would suggest that he might have a bit of a backlog at the moment. And second, your information is not exactly in direct contradiction to the consumer upshot of what The Bits posted. It's different information and a little fresher, but the end-result for the Blu-ray fan is the same. Bill may be waiting for an update which actually tells his readers something new about if/when they can expect the disc which, IMO, is an entirely appropriate and reasonable way to look at the story and the kind of decision that thoughtful journalists and editors make every day.
I didn't want to start a thread on the guy or his site, since apparently here that is frown upon, especially when he is being criticized.
04-07-09, 11:14 AM
#75
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Bill Hunt says: Wait
You make a reasonable point, but being upset with the guy because 'OMG! It's been 5 days!' seems a little unrealistic to me. For all you know, his client may have mis-flagged your email as spam.