I'm just guessing, but I would think that most people go looking for old threads that they remember coming across before, or heard referenced in other threads. I seriously doubt that most people are looking for their own posts, but I also don't think it matters whose posts they're looking for or why they want them.

I realize that most of what is posted here is silly and ephemeral, and I don't really give a rat's ass whether 99.9% of it gets lost or not, but I don't see the harm in trying to hang on to the small amount that some people do care about. I bet the .1% that I care about isn't the same .1% that others in this thread are concerned about, and vice versa. I also think that at a certain point a thread belongs much more to the community than it does to the OP. Of course, in the end, it's all really up to those who administer this site.

At the end of the day I know I'm not going to lose any sleep over this however it turns out, but I'm still an interested bystander and I'll give my opinion when I have one., and yeah, this bugs me enough to post about it.

Hear! Hear!

:up:

I am strongly in favor of the current rules.

HEY!!! :mad:

Where's that bankruptual thread?Now, ain't THAT da truth! :lol:

THEEK! :eek: (Aka: :editking: )

Looks like it was also deleted. I'm glad I had a chance to read it today. That was another informative thread stricken from the record.

AMEN BROTHER! :up:

It was PACKED with great info, Indeed!

While the thread might have had some good info, I think it was apparent that some people were being too harsh with the OP and he didn't want the thread to go on. That could be his loss. I would just advise people to just let it go.

...but sometimes letting go is hard to do.... :(

Who was the OP that deleted it?

strongly in favor? something tells me that you have deleted your own threads. :lol:

Seriously, I'm really disappointed the 'judge my taste in men' thread has been deleted. Despite some off-topic bickering back and forth, me and digi were having a legitimate discussion, that although may have been better suited somewhere else, was imo something important for both of us since there has been some history of hostility between us. We definitely weren't going that route this time.

Unless you get a scratched DVD or poorly packaged one, nothing on DVD Talk should really piss you off. If a thread goes poof, it's still just a thread on the internet. You can always start a new one to proclaim your hatred for Spike's hair color or Willow's quivering lip.

I'm fine with the current system, except for the updated thread title not showing up in forum view. I asked about that, but it was pretty much ignored. Unless it's going to generate ad revenue for the site, I wouldn't think it's worth changing anything. :lol:

I was wondering where that thread went. Stupid to be deleted.

Believe it or not, I was just writing up a "serious" comment to Liquid when the thread went poof. Something along the lines of how my original post had been sardonic, and how he would have been better served by focusing on more pressing issues...

But now it's gone. So I end up just looking like a jackass. :(

I'm having an Alanis Morrisette moment. :p

if people wnat to carry on discussion, they can create a new thread.

based on the number of reported posts that thread generated, i'm glad it was deleted (atleast coming from a mod pov)

Isn't it this guy who deleted it?
or am I remembering wrong?

Not sure, I don't remember who started the thread.

I'm happy with the current policy. Occasionally a thread that I was enjoying gets deleted, but it's not often. However, I've deleted more than one newly-created thread because someone else beat me to it by a minute or two, or because I'd screwed up the title or something. I don't want to have to call a mod every time I goof.

Limiting the ability to delete threads to the first 24 hours would still allow for that.

For some reason, the WWE Releases Thread on the DVD Talk forum has been deleted twice already. The first time was the original poster, according to what a mod said. Now we don't know who did it but i suspect it was the same person. My questions:

1- Why are all members granted priviledge to delete threads? There was some good discussion of what were the best places to get some wrestling DVDs and all of it gets deleted because the OP has some beef or something.

2- Is there any way to stop these?

You should just start a new thread. Then he won't be able to be a baby and delete it. Or perhaps the mods can resurrect it and delete the OP's first post.

I asked you all to keep that thread on topic, you failed.

Talk about e-bay auctions, talk about DVD's that were released a year ago, talk about buying old video tapes for a dollar a piece and selling them on ebay for close to $500.

This was a thread for "Upcoming WWE DVD Releases" and I am wading thru ten pages of WCW video tapes, Ebay auctions, TNA DVD's.

I dleeted the thread because it was so far off topic and no one would keep it on topic. If you want s general disscussion thread, make one, no one is stopping you.

It was my thread, I should have the right to delete it. I should have done it right when the ebay auction crap started, that was my mistake.

That seems a reasonable compromise to me.

I completely understand the ebay discussion getting on your nerves, but the other discussion comes with the territory. Since it was the only wrestling related DVD thread, people felt the necessity to clarify some questions and discuss past releases. Still, i think you are wrong in deleting the thread since it became an active part of the forum even though you started it, but I'll follow your suggestion and start a new thread myself. If you had any problem with the topics being discussed, you should have contacted a moderator instead of taking the ball and running away with it like a little boy.

Ditto.

It's ashame you felt that way, that thread was a great thread with some great conversation. While the ebay thing may be illegal to the board(and that is fine), threads can sometimes go off topic. It was good discussion, I'm really disappointed in your choice.

Many people don't even know a thread is deleted until they actively look for it. I'd like to see the thread title stay in the list of threads on the main page, possible with a DELETED indicator similar to the lock on locked threads. If the software allows it they could even restrict access so no one could view the contents of the thread, but at least people would know that the thread has been deleted and can request it be restored. It would also allow people to see repeat offenders and decide whether or not they want to post in their threads in the future. Eventually the thread would fall of the main page if no one cared about it.

Given the example by Erik68, how about this as a possible idea (and if this was already mentioned, oops) - After 24 hours the originator cannot delete the thread if there are replies. But, after 24 hours, the originator can lock or close the thread. This way, people can still see and reference the contents if they desire, and even start a new thread if they want. This gives the originator a degree of control without pissing off everyone else. Obviously, this should be used with discretion.

Locking a thread by the OP seems like a good compromise to me too. It serves the exact same purpose as deleting the thread, except that the information doesn't get lost.

Agreed. I doubt the forum software allows for normal users to have lock functions. But, if not they could set it so they can't delete after 24 hours, and can contact a mod to lock if after that point.

More work for mods, but it shouldn't be too much as it seems like these long thread deletions just happen a handful of times a year.

:up:

Sounds like a good compromise.

Thread starters have always had the "right" to ask a mod to lock their threads. I think this is still a solution, but the "management" has never been very receptive to the notion that deleting threads is something that shouldn't be allowed.

You are the OP, right?

yes. so I guess I could delete this thread if I wanted. but I won't.

Speaking of deleted threads, it appears the "Why the PS2 Will Fail" thread in Video Game Talk has been deleted. Any reason why?

Yeah, several people got worked up because they didn't agree with my personal opinion about the PS2 controllers, then the OP got embarrassed when he tried to mock me and my response made him look silly.

1) If your going to dish it out you need to be able to take it

2) Everyone is entitled to their personal opinion.


The last thing before the delete was Hinkle said he put me on ignore. Am I supposed to feel bad about that?

Personally I thought it was an interesting discussion, oh well.

:banana:

It's a test. We'll see how it goes. Also testing out another feature to see the impact.