What is the point? That we should not have made a book forum? Or that books are not elected and don't go to war? :)

I think the difference is this. You want a political subforum because the political/war threads take up 50% of the forum. Books was created FOR THE OPPOSITE REASON. Because the forum was so full of silly threads (one starting by the time you finished reading another), that the lone book thread fell of the page. No pun intended.

I actually thought the book forum was created to send threads there to die. A cyber retirement-home, if you will.

Either way, I feel both extremes are valid reasons for creating a new forum. And if you don't agree with me, then your opinion is wrong. :)

Now I have to type slower again....

:)

Read earlier. I said I am in favor of the subforum.

Then make it happen!

Don't you get tired of Geoff calling the shots and you being his lackey? Don't you want to be the big man? Take control, mi amigo!

I'm thinking we should move Sports back into Other -- at least temporarily. It would help dilute the political threads.

No, no. You need to move the wrestling threads into the TV forum. Work on that first.

Uh oh.....


[Bando runs away.]

:) project much? :)

:lol:

Flashbacks? ;)

"Show him who wears the pants."

Only 20% of the WWE's arena events are televised

However, 100% of Lakers games are televised -- move them to TV Forum


Simple, easy math

Hey... why'd I come in last place???

<B>And it was a political thread at that!</b> :mad:

That list sucks. -ptth-

-k
###

The WWE is a scripted soap opera. Laker games are not.

Fighting, wrestling, and politics subforum - they all are about the same.

Okay, now who's being gullible?

Why do you think they huddle before the game - they're discussing their acting roles!