5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...n_Logo.svg.png
30 Days of Criterion - Discussion Thread August 31st (dusk) - October 1st (dawn) Although I've been running the challenge for a few years now, much of the credit goes to Trevor for first leading the challenge and to Travis McClain for his countless contributions. Much of the language in this post and in the checklist originated, at least in one way or another, to Trevor's original challenge. The goal of the Criterion Challenge is to watch Criterion content and share your experience with the rest of us. There is no specific number goal, no winners, no losers, no prizes. Rather than compile long lists, watch what you would normally watch in a month, but concentrate it on Criterion content as much as you can/want. In fact, bulk watching is discouraged, as that will limit your time for discussion and for immersing yourself in a film. Participants are encouraged to explore fully a film and its supplemental material. There will be a separate thread to include your lists as linked above. A daily journal sort of entry is recommended for your list. Since counting is not required or "scored" in any way, you are free to be as creative as you wish in how you list items. Bolding of your item titles is encouraged, if only to make them stand out to allow others to quickly see if they have seen the same items and wish to comment. Give reviews. Even if it's just a mini-review, a simple :up:/:down:, or a one word description. Be creative and personalize it however you wish - use one post for the whole month, daily posts, weekly posts, give reviews, provide IMDB links, add YouTube videos, add images, etc. It's recommended that you provide a link to your list(s) in your signature for easy access. Last year's List Thread should give you a good idea how participants format their lists. What qualifies? Any film, short, video or supplemental feature that has been released by Criterion/Eclipse qualifies. The film does not have to watched on an actual Criterion disc. You may watch the film on any format imaginable, provided that it is the same film that Criterion has released. For example, the film On the Waterfront was released by Criterion on DVD/BD. But you don't have to watch the movie on that particular DVD/BD. You can watch it on VHS, on broadcast TV, on the internet, Netflix, HuluPlus, iTunes, or any of the other DVD/BD releases On the Waterfront has had. Additionally, any title released by Criterion exclusively on streaming (See: HuluPlus) is eligible for this challenge. Discussion and debate on how to change the Challenge is encouraged. We have made sizable changes this year, but it's always good to get the conversation going for next year. [COLOR="Blue"]Check out the full list of Criterion and Eclipse DVD and BD releases here. Criterion's website allows for sorting by Brand, Format, Director, Country, Decade, and Features. This will allow easy searching for working through needed checklist items. There are some titles currently streaming on Netflix, including a number of OOP titles. On rare occasions, you can find an Eclipse title there as well. There are many Criterion titles available on Hulu Plus. Last year we decided to count any title available on Criterion's Hulu Plus site. These include titles that Criterion has the rights to, but has yet to release on DVD/BD. Hulu Plus offers a standard 1-week free trial. Additionally, Criterion regularly rotates new titles for "free" viewing on Hulu (usually 3-4 titles). A quick Google search will occasionally locate various "deals" with longer free Hulu Plus trial memberships. Criterion titles occasionally appear on broadcast television. Keep an eye on this discussion thread for upcoming broadcasts. Criterion Laserdisc releases are also eligible for the challenge. Optional Checklist The checklist is completely optional. It is just a "fun" inclusion to give one a sense of accomplishment, to help one diversify viewing, or to use as a guide on what to watch next. Feature Presentation Watch one film from every decade covered by Criterion. --- 1920/1930 - (insert film title here) --- 1940 - --- 1950 - --- 1960 - --- 1970 - --- 1980 - --- 1990 - --- 2000/2010 - Watch something from spine number range: --- 001-050 - --- 051-100 - --- 101-150 - --- 151-200 - --- 201-250 - --- 251-300 - --- 301-350 - --- 351-400 - --- 401-450 - --- 451-500 - --- 501-550 – --- 551-600 - --- 601-650 - --- 650-700 - --- an Eclipse title - --- Watch a title not released on DVD by Criterion (Hint: Check DVD Spine# here for some eligible titles) - Watch films in at least 5 languages. --- First language, (insert language), (insert title). --- Second language, (insert language), (insert title). --- Third language, (insert language), (insert title). --- Fourth language, (insert language), (insert title). --- Fifth language, (insert language), (insert title). Watch 5 films from different people in Criterion's Explore People section (Each title must be unique. For example, Pierrot Le Fou could NOT count for Jean-Paul Belmondo, Jean-Luc Godard, and Anna Karina, just one) --- First Person, (insert title) --- Second Person, (insert title) --- Third Person, (insert title) --- Fourth Person, (insert title) --- Fifth Person, (insert title) Watch a film from 5 different “themes” on Criterion’s website --- First Theme name, (insert title) --- Second Theme name, (insert title) --- Third Theme name, (insert title) --- Fourth Theme name, (insert title) --- Fifth Theme name, (insert title) Special Edition Features Read 5 essays from the Criterion booklets and/or listed here – --- First Essay title, (title of film) --- Second Essay title, (title of film) --- Third Essay title, (title of film) --- Fourth Essay title, (title of film) --- Fifth Essay title, (title of film) Watch 5 Criterion supplemental interviews. --- First Interview Name, (insert film title) --- Second Interview Name, (insert film title) --- Third Interview Name, (insert film title) --- Fourth Interview Name, (insert film title) --- Fifth Interview Name, (insert film title) Watch 5 Criterion Theatrical Trailers --- First Trailer Title --- Second Trailer Title --- Third Trailer Title --- Fourth Trailer Title --- Fifth Trailer Title --- Watch a film with commentary – --- Watch a supplemental short film – --- Watch a Criterion disc completely. Every part of it. - --- Watch an entire Criterion Collector's Set/Eclipse Box Set/Top Ten List - --- Listen to a Criterion/Eclipse film soundtrack - (One film could fill multiple items. Example: Fanny & Alexander would qualify for a decade, language, spine number range, theme (Blue Christmases), etc.) (Change "---" to "-X-" or some similar mark when you have completed that line item.) The challenge officially begins August 31 at dusk in whatever location you are in at the time, and ends on October 1st at dawn in whatever location you are in at that time. Also, feel free to time your final Criterion film(s) to coincide with the start of the Horror Challenge. Travis McClain provided the following links, which are quite helpful. Criterion.com Twitter - @Criterion Flickchart - The Best Criterion Collection Films Flickchart: The Blog - Criterion Commentaries ICheckMovies.com - The Criterion Collection iCheckMovies - Criterion's Eclipse Collection Flickchart - Criterion Collection on Hulu Flickchart - Criterion Eclipse Titles Flickchart - Criterion Collection Travis McClain's Criterion for Noobs ntnon provided a list of Amazon Prime eligible titles |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I've still got some edits to make to the first post, and I'll continue to do that running up to (and through) the challenge itself. I'd love to hear feedback on the checklist, which is certainly NOT necessarily final. It's an exact replica of last year's checklist with the extra spine numbers. I just wanted to get the thread, and conversation, started.
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Woot! This has become my favorite challenge of the year. I have a couple of things to add up front, before I forget 'em.
Earlier this year, I compiled a list of my own of "Criterion for Noobs". These are 20 titles in The Criterion Collection that I personally feel make for nice starting points for those who are just beginning to explore it. I'm sure there are other, equally deserving movies but these are 20 that I've seen. I'll periodically make revisions as I continue to explore it myself. I also got to thinking about the checklist item of watching every part of a Criterion disc. I wonder if we should amend that to exclude some of the early, single-disc editions that only include a trailer and brief featurette. Lastly - and I think this was briefly discussed last year - I propose that we revise the "Top Ten Directors" sub-section and make it "Watch Films from [X] People". That curated list includes actors and directors, so maybe we could up it from 5 to 10 OR we could set it at 5 with the stipulation of no duplication for that section. More as I think of it. I'm excited for this challenge! |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802746)
Earlier this year, I compiled a list of my own of "Criterion for Noobs". These are 20 titles in The Criterion Collection that I personally feel make for nice starting points for those who are just beginning to explore it. I'm sure there are other, equally deserving movies but these are 20 that I've seen. I'll periodically make revisions as I continue to explore it myself.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802746)
I also got to thinking about the checklist item of watching every part of a Criterion disc. I wonder if we should amend that to exclude some of the early, single-disc editions that only include a trailer and brief featurette.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802746)
Lastly - and I think this was briefly discussed last year - I propose that we revise the "Top Ten Directors" sub-section and make it "Watch Films from [X] People". That curated list includes actors and directors, so maybe we could up it from 5 to 10 OR we could set it at 5 with the stipulation of no duplication for that section.
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Last year the spine numbers were bothering me a bit (we are up to 16 individual films) required for that portion of the checklist. Do we need an expansion in range, an elimination of that portion, which is simultaneously iconic and arbitrary, or should I keep it the way that it is? This is an issue that I really go back and forth on and I worry that it's becoming a bloated part of the checklist. Every other part encourages exploration, the spine numbers don't really do that.
I also have reordered my Criterion titles to be alphabetical (from ordered by spine numbers) within the last year, so I could be completely subjective on this one. The change was one of utility as I wanted to be able to find the titles more easily. |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802746)
Woot! This has become my favorite challenge of the year. I have a couple of things to add up front, before I forget 'em.
Earlier this year, I compiled a list of my own of "Criterion for Noobs". These are 20 titles in The Criterion Collection that I personally feel make for nice starting points for those who are just beginning to explore it. I'm sure there are other, equally deserving movies but these are 20 that I've seen. I'll periodically make revisions as I continue to explore it myself. Travis, I really like your list and have only seen eleven of the twenty films. I've got some catching up to do! While I have viewed many a list on Criterion.com, I've never created one. You've inspired me to give it a try!
Originally Posted by CardiffGiant
(Post 11802790)
Last year the spine numbers were bothering me a bit (we are up to 16 individual films) required for that portion of the checklist. Do we need an expansion in range, an elimination of that portion, which is simultaneously iconic and arbitrary, or should I keep it the way that it is? This is an issue that I really go back and forth on and I worry that it's becoming a bloated part of the checklist. Every other part encourages exploration, the spine numbers don't really do that.
I also have reordered my Criterion titles to be alphabetical (from ordered by spine numbers) within the last year, so I could be completely subjective on this one. The change was one of utility as I wanted to be able to find the titles more easily. |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by CardiffGiant
(Post 11802778)
Could someone watch a film and a single trailer and watch "every part of a disc"? Sure, but I also think that we might discourage more participation in the checklist that we encourage. Ultimately, I think it might be difficult to determine what is enough to constitute a checkmark.
Originally Posted by CardiffGiant
(Post 11802790)
Do we need an expansion in range, an elimination of that portion, which is simultaneously iconic and arbitrary, or should I keep it the way that it is? This is an issue that I really go back and forth on and I worry that it's becoming a bloated part of the checklist. Every other part encourages exploration, the spine numbers don't really do that.
As promised, more thoughts... I was also just now reviewing the Decades breakdown on Criterion.com. Here's where it stands at present: 1920s (17) 1930s (97) 1940s (113) 1950s (183) 1960s (269) 1970s (138) 1980s (106) 1990s (72) 2000s (41) 2010s (13) We might consider consolidating 1920s with the 1930s, at least until such time as a substantial number of 20s films are added. Ditto the 00s and 10s, which combine to give us a paltry 44 options this year. Additionally, I was looking at the Brands section, which at present includes: Criterion (736) Eclipse (193) Essential Art House (64) Other (58) At present, we have --- an Eclipse title - --- Watch a title not released on DVD by Criterion as checklist items, but if we add Essential Art House, Other and --- the LaserDisc library (308), then that creates five Brands which could make for a formal sub-section. The Criterion Collection on Hulu could be a sixth Brand, giving participants a choice of five of the six. I also propose eliminating --- Watch a film which won an Academy Award - since Oscar Winning is one of the formal Themes from which we can choose. and rewording --- Watch films in at least five languages. to become --- Watch films from at least five countries At present, there is at least one film in The Criterion Collection from 32 different countries. (Technically, 31 but they count Germany's 24 films separate from West Germany's 1. Whatever.) |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by mrcellophane
(Post 11802825)
Travis, I really like your list and have only seen eleven of the twenty films. I've got some catching up to do! While I have viewed many a list on Criterion.com, I've never created one. You've inspired me to give it a try!
I would vote for expanding the range, perhaps to cover 100 titles. --- 001-100 --- 101-200 --- 201-300 --- 301-400 --- 401-500 --- 501-600 --- 601-681 I'd be down with that, especially if we consider my aforementioned sub-section proposals. I do feel that the spine number is such a uniquely Criterion thing that it ought to be represented in the checklist somehow, and I also do believe it does promote exploration. |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I thought it was a requirement that we watch everything on a disc (or discs). That had some effect on what I've watched during past challenges. Guess I need to go back a read the rules again.
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Dimension X
(Post 11802859)
I thought it was a requirement that we watch everything on a disc (or discs). That had some effect on what I've watched during past challenges. Guess I need to go back a read the rules again.
*Except that one check mark for watching every bit of content on a disc. |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802746)
Earlier this year, I compiled a list of my own of "Criterion for Noobs". These are 20 titles in The Criterion Collection that I personally feel make for nice starting points for those who are just beginning to explore it. I'm sure there are other, equally deserving movies but these are 20 that I've seen. I'll periodically make revisions as I continue to explore it myself.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802863)
Oh, noes! What we've said is that we encourage participants to take the time and really explore a film's bonus content as part of the celebration of Criterion, rather than try to up the movie watch count, but it's not at all mandatory!*
*Except that one check mark for watching every bit of content on a disc. |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Dimension X
(Post 11802872)
I was beginning to think I hadn't seen any of these, but turns out I've seen 12. I have, or can easily get my hands on a few of those I haven't seen, so I might just give 'em a look-see.
Well, now I feel like I wasted my time that time when I looked for my unwatched Criterion with the fewest extras. :lol: That's good to know. Plus now I don't have to feel like I'm cheating when I watch films I've recorded off TCM or non-Criterion versions of films. |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
FINALLY! I found a Top Ten list I should be able to actually complete! Jaime Hernandez's Top 10 includes eight films streaming on HuluPlus. Bicycle Thieves, I can get on DVD from my local library. That leaves me with just Nights of Cabiria to locate. I'll place an Inter-Library Loan request for that tomorrow and hope that they can find it for me.
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I own a few Criterions, and movies that have been released as Criterions, so I will be participating. There are also the occasional movie I see on tv now and then, as I have seen Videodrome listed on tv a few times lately.
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
My favorite challenge coming right at the beginning of my favorite season of the year. I've been looking forward to this since... Well, last October.
I already have a huge "Watchlist" put together - though, as always, I'll probably only end up watching a small percentage of it. One of my goals this time around is to watch a few of the titles that are exclusive to Hulu. |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Gives me an excuse to watch my LD Criterion of Citizen Kane. :)
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I've only seen eight of the titles on Travis' list. :sad:
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I've seen many Criterions, but I'm only at 7 on the Noob list.
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I'm anxious for September. I don't think I've watched a Criterion film in the past year, and really need some non-fluff to watch.
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 11803902)
I'm anxious for September. I don't think I've watched a Criterion film in the past year, and really need some non-fluff to watch.
Inspired by Travis's awesome "noob" list, I decided to put one of my own together: Best Laid Plans, Gone Awry. I really like the list feature on Criterion's website, and I've been reading quite a few of them! |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by mrcellophane
(Post 11803928)
Inspired by Travis's awesome "noob" list, I decided to put one of my own together: Best Laid Plans, Gone Awry. I really like the list feature on Criterion's website, and I've been reading quite a few of them!
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by davidh777
(Post 11803308)
I've only seen eight of the titles on Travis' list. :sad:
Originally Posted by mrcellophane
(Post 11803928)
Inspired by Travis's awesome "noob" list, I decided to put one of my own together: Best Laid Plans, Gone Awry. I really like the list feature on Criterion's website, and I've been reading quite a few of them!
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
General comments first: I'm glad to see so much early enthusiasm for the challenge. Last year proved difficult for significant watching for me, but I plan to get through a large portion of my unwatched pile this year.
Originally Posted by mrcellophane
(Post 11802825)
I would vote for expanding the range, perhaps to cover 100 titles. I too had to alphabetize my Criterion titles after my collection grew too large.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802832)
I think the spine numbers do encourage exploration. They draw us to 16 different specific pools of 50 films. I don't think it's terribly bloated at present, particularly since we allow for duplication throughout the checklist.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802832)
I was also just now reviewing the Decades breakdown on Criterion.com. Here's where it stands at present:
We might consider consolidating 1920s with the 1930s, at least until such time as a substantial number of 20s films are added. Ditto the 00s and 10s, which combine to give us a paltry 44 options this year.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802832)
Additionally, I was looking at the Brands section, which at present includes:
as checklist items, but if we add Essential Art House, Other... then that creates five Brands which could make for a formal sub-section. The Criterion Collection on Hulu could be a sixth Brand, giving participants a choice of five of the six. I'm wondering if we couldn't expand by dealing with supplements a bit more, if we want that to be the aim of the challenge. Or, if we simply keep the spine numbers as they are and table this for next year's challenge.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802832)
I also propose eliminating
--- Watch a film which won an Academy Award - since Oscar Winning is one of the formal Themes from which we can choose.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802832)
and rewording
--- Watch films in at least five languages. to become --- Watch films from at least five countries At present, there is at least one film in The Criterion Collection from 32 different countries. (Technically, 31 but they count Germany's 24 films separate from West Germany's 1. Whatever.) I do think we need to add, if we are going to subtract, I'm just not sure what the best way to do that is.
Originally Posted by Dimension X
(Post 11802859)
I thought it was a requirement that we watch everything on a disc (or discs). That had some effect on what I've watched during past challenges. Guess I need to go back a read the rules again.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11802878)
I'm actually scouring Criterion's Top Ten lists right now...
Originally Posted by Sondheim
(Post 11803160)
My favorite challenge coming right at the beginning of my favorite season of the year. I've been looking forward to this since... Well, last October.
I already have a huge "Watchlist" put together - though, as always, I'll probably only end up watching a small percentage of it. One of my goals this time around is to watch a few of the titles that are exclusive to Hulu. |
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
In addition to my replies...I'm going to poke around and see if there might be some other way to introduce more subcategories into the list and pare down the spine numbers. I'll do a little tinkering and see what I can find. In the meantime, suggestions are always welcome.
|
Re: 5th Annual Criterion Challenge - Discussion Thread
I found several Criterion films available to rent digitally from Amazon and Vudu late last night, incidentally. Most titles were available from both, but there were some available only from one or the other. Something to think about, especially for anyone with any credit on either site.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.