![]() |
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Great news. Haven't had the time to import a copy yet -- now I'm glad I didn't. :up:
Originally Posted by nodeerforamonth
(Post 9427424)
Despite what everyone said on the internets, Ringu was complete and utter shit compared to The Ring.
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Originally Posted by LickTheABCs
(Post 9428859)
<< anti-remake.
I don't hate ALL remakes just the unnecessary ones. In fact, 2 of my favorite movies ever are remakes (The Thing and The Fly).. Scarface The Ring Ocean's Eleven There are not many more where the remake is definitely better than the original. |
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Question for everybody -- Does anyone own the Region 1 Canadian edition of [REC] that was released in January? Just curious if it has any special feature on it? If so, I'm going to go ahead and buy it. Plus, it has better cover art, which isn't a big deal to me, but hey, if it's already out and I can get it several weeks before the US one, might as well:
http://www.amazon.ca/Rec-Jaume-Balag...5534081&sr=8-1 Can anyone tell me if there are any special features at all or if there is anything bad, like bad subtitles, etc...? |
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Originally Posted by Seantn
(Post 9515462)
Question for everybody -- Does anyone own the Region 1 Canadian edition of [REC] that was released in January? Just curious if it has any special feature on it? If so, I'm going to go ahead and buy it. Plus, it has better cover art, which isn't a big deal to me, but hey, if it's already out and I can get it several weeks before the US one, might as well:
Can anyone tell me if there are any special features at all or if there is anything bad, like bad subtitles, etc...? I saw QUARANTINE on dvd a couple of months ago. I have yet to see [REC]. I was very mixed on QUARANTINE. I thought it had some good stuff in it, but the characters kept making really stupid decisions over and over again - all of the lead characters' safety could have been secured if any of them acted smart. I can excuse one or two idiotic characters, but when the entire screenplay is so contived and lazy to make people stupid just to propel the plot, I eventually give up. I did really like the last 20 or so minutes though, once all hell breaks loose and the characters are just trying to escape instead of making any kind of intelligent decisions. I understand QUARANTINE is a shot-for-shot remake of [REC], but does that mean the dialog and characters in [REC] are as stupid as the ones in QUARANTINE? For example, why do the scientists even come into the building to drill the guy's head when they already know there's an epidemic? What exactly are they gaining except to create some lame horror-film shock set-up shot. Close-up of scientist - then dead-body (Schaech) jumps up and bites him. Duh - saw it coming a million miles ahead and it doesn't even make sense. I hope [REC] is not as dumb and condescending to its audience as in the first hour of QUARANTINE. I'm willing to buy [REC] as a blind-buy based on its reviews, but if its script and characters are as dumb as in QUARANTINE, maybe I'll netflix instead. |
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Originally Posted by Mr-Sardonicus
(Post 9515488)
Excellent question. I'd like to know also.
I saw QUARANTINE on dvd a couple of months ago. I have yet to see [REC]. I was very mixed on QUARANTINE. I thought it had some good stuff in it, but the characters kept making really stupid decisions over and over again - all of the lead characters' safety could have been secured if any of them acted smart. I can excuse one or two idiotic characters, but when the entire screenplay is so contived and lazy to make people stupid just to propel the plot, I eventually give up. I did really like the last 20 or so minutes though, once all hell breaks loose and the characters are just trying to escape instead of making any kind of intelligent decisions. I understand QUARANTINE is a shot-for-shot remake of [REC], but does that mean the dialog and characters in [REC] are as stupid as the ones in QUARANTINE? For example, why do the scientists even come into the building to drill the guy's head when they already know there's an epidemic? What exactly are they gaining except to create some lame horror-film shock set-up shot. Close-up of scientist - then dead-body (Schaech) jumps up and bites him. Duh - saw it coming a million miles ahead and it doesn't even make sense. I hope [REC] is not as dumb and condescending to its audience as in the first hour of QUARANTINE. I'm willing to buy [REC] as a blind-buy based on its reviews, but if its script and characters are as dumb as in QUARANTINE, maybe I'll netflix instead. Spoiler:
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Wait a minute! Quarantine is a "shot by shot" remake of [REC]?!??! Can anyone verify this? If so, I'm not going to bother...
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Never wanted to see Quarantine..but I did want to see [REC]
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
I had no interest in seeing Quarantine. I do want to see [REC], though.
Shame that there's no Blu release in the States to go with it... |
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Originally Posted by nodeerforamonth
(Post 9516170)
Wait a minute! Quarantine is a "shot by shot" remake of [REC]?!??! Can anyone verify this? If so, I'm not going to bother...
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
I just watched REC, and I found it might tighter, better flowing and more frightening than Quarantine (which I also liked). Of course, it is shorter. Plus with Quarantine, you have the aspect of "hey, there's Deb from Dexter!" wheras I was able to suspend my disbelief far easier and get into the idea that this was "real footage" with REC.
The DVD also has a comically bad English dub, for those not inclined toward subtitles for whatever reason. |
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
I just watched [REC]. Very intense and interesting movie. It was a good decision to keep the movie as short as possible. By the way a sequel is currently in the works.
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Trailer for Part 2 -- Looks cool. You can see some of the characters from the original
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/m0-gVB-U5is&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/m0-gVB-U5is&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object> |
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Nice....makes me want to see the first one. I guess I should. I NEVER wanted to see Quarantine but [Rec] looked a lot cooler.
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
ah... looks like a video game to me.
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
I think I would have enjoyed REC better if I had seen this 1st before Quarantine. I noticed how strikingly similar these 2 films were. Quarantine was nearly a shot by shot clone of REC.
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
I just watched Rec for the first time over the weekend & absolutely loved it, (it helped that watched it with about 12 people all seeing it for the 1st time). A rare movie worthy of the hype, overall I don't think it was that scary, except for the last 10 minutes or so, which was absolutely terrifying. It's such a simple idea, that it's so refreshing seeing a horror film, with no music, give the audience legit scares.
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Isn't the horror genre pretty much much controlled by Europe and Asia nowadays?
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 9581718)
Isn't the horror genre pretty much much controlled by Europe and Asia nowadays?
|
Re: [REC]---July 14, 2009
Right. I've never seen an Asian Horror film but...for the most part based on the remakes who...sometimes have the the same creators behind it in some way, it is shock based "horror". Closest we got so far to great horror is Drag Me to Hell..which wasn't even true horror it had camp elements in it yeah but...it's part horror.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.