Revenge: Director's Cut -- 5/8/07
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sand Point
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Revenge: Director's Cut -- 5/8/07
According to DavisDVD:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment will release Revenge: Director's Cut on May 8th. Kevin Costner, Madeleine Stowe and Anthony Quinn star in director Tony Scott's tale of passion and retribution, now presented in a long-delayed new extended cut. The DVD includes a 2.35:1 anamorphic transfer and Dolby Digital 5.1 tracks. Extras are TBA. Retail will be $19.94.
#3
DVD Talk God
No your not the only one.
I really liked this movie and I thought the ending was really moving. I'll definitelly get this one.
I really liked this movie and I thought the ending was really moving. I'll definitelly get this one.
#5
Senior Member
I'm pretty sure the movie is only about 30 seconds longer. They show the extended scene where Anthony Quin kicks his dog in the face six times before throwing it in the pool.
#9
DVD Talk Special Edition
Great movie, one of my guilty pleasures...looking forward to watching again!
#10
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is my favorite Tony Scott movie, and I can´t wait to watch the director´s cut. Anyone know more about this cut? More violence? More lovestory? Someone told me it was shorter hmmmm, this is an exciting release!
#12
Moderator
It clocks in at 100 minutes (original ran 123 minutes) with the following features:
Commentary with Director Tony Scott
"Obsession": The Sex and Violence of Revenge
Commentary with Director Tony Scott
"Obsession": The Sex and Violence of Revenge
#14
DVD Talk God
What the hell is up with a shorter Director's Cut? First Oliver Stone and now Tony Scott. At least it has a commentary and maybe Tony will shed some light on this. BTW, the artwork stinks. What's up with Costner looking like the Marlboro man?
#15
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: ...wait a minute, where the hell am I?
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, is there going to be another worthless dvd review from dvdtalk where the reviewer has not seen to previous cut of the film, again?
#16
Registered
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Marblehead, MA
Posts: 6,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by purplechoe
So, is there going to be another worthless dvd review from dvdtalk where the reviewer has not seen to previous cut of the film, again?
#17
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What the hell is up with a shorter Director's Cut? First Oliver Stone and now Tony Scott. At least it has a commentary and maybe Tony will shed some light on this.
Personally, while I really like the original cut (I think it's far and away Scott's best movie), I can definitely see where it could be tightened a lot. The whole Sally Kirkland sequence in particular strikes me as a terribly pointless (and contrived) plot device that could be cut without much trouble.
I'm kind of hoping this isn't just a case of editing out but also adding stuff we've never seen before, too. The movie could use a lot more of the Miguel Ferrer and John Leguizamo characters. It'd also be nice if there was more time spent fleshing out the Costner/Quinn relationship. As is we kind of have to take it on faith that they're good friends. They certainly don't act it, even before Costner lays the pipe to Quinn's trophy wife.
BTW, the artwork stinks. What's up with Costner looking like the Marlboro man?
Last edited by Count_Zero; 05-04-07 at 11:04 AM.
#18
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Sorry, but I am not going to hate. If Scott had control over this, which it appears he did, and thinks it is a better movie at 100 minutes, then I trust him. And last time I saw it, I thought it easily could have been cut in areas. Longer does not mean better.
#19
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone have any more opinions on the director's cut vs the theatrical cut? I was bummed to see that the original dvd is so old and apparently fullscreen. I loved this movie and was hoping to finally replace my laser disc, but all I have to replace it with is a seriously cut down Director's cut or a very old pressing of the original cut in fs What are the chances they release the original cut in a new pressing?
Last edited by Crow331; 08-17-08 at 09:34 PM.
#20
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's an Original Version in Widescreen- 16x9
but it appears to be Out Of Print for some time.-like all the flippers that had widescreen/fullscreen version
there's a huge line of these dvd's that are hard, but possible to find in Widescreen ( Roxanne, Idle Hands, Cable Guy, Multiplicity, etc.
I'd say checked USED stores. also on ebay, they go for cheap, but kinda hard to decipher at times if you are in fact getting one with the widescreen version as well
but it appears to be Out Of Print for some time.-like all the flippers that had widescreen/fullscreen version
there's a huge line of these dvd's that are hard, but possible to find in Widescreen ( Roxanne, Idle Hands, Cable Guy, Multiplicity, etc.
I'd say checked USED stores. also on ebay, they go for cheap, but kinda hard to decipher at times if you are in fact getting one with the widescreen version as well
#21
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone have any more opinions on the director's cut vs the theatrical cut? I was bummed to see that the original dvd is so old and apparently fullscreen. I loved this movie and was hoping to finally replace my laser disc, but all I have to replace it with is a seriously cut down Director's cut or a very old pressing of the original cut in fs What are the chances they release the original cut in a new pressing?
If you could locate a copy of the old DVD, with the widescreen presentation, get it.
(This is probably the last film where Madeline Stowe looked so beautiful, shortly after she underwent the much publicized plastic surgery).
Pro-B
#22
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like this film quite a bit. I have the old DVD with the PAN/SCAN and 16/9 versions on it and it is clearly the better version to have. I viewed the BR disc which offers the shorter cut the director favored but it definitely stutters - I would not recommend it.
If you could locate a copy of the old DVD, with the widescreen presentation, get it.
(This is probably the last film where Madeline Stowe looked so beautiful, shortly after she underwent the much publicized plastic surgery).
Pro-B
If you could locate a copy of the old DVD, with the widescreen presentation, get it.
(This is probably the last film where Madeline Stowe looked so beautiful, shortly after she underwent the much publicized plastic surgery).
Pro-B
I never could figure out how some stars get bad surgeries. You would think they would have first hand knowledge of the best out there.
#23
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's an Original Version in Widescreen- 16x9
but it appears to be Out Of Print for some time.-like all the flippers that had widescreen/fullscreen version
there's a huge line of these dvd's that are hard, but possible to find in Widescreen ( Roxanne, Idle Hands, Cable Guy, Multiplicity, etc.
I'd say checked USED stores. also on ebay, they go for cheap, but kinda hard to decipher at times if you are in fact getting one with the widescreen version as well
but it appears to be Out Of Print for some time.-like all the flippers that had widescreen/fullscreen version
there's a huge line of these dvd's that are hard, but possible to find in Widescreen ( Roxanne, Idle Hands, Cable Guy, Multiplicity, etc.
I'd say checked USED stores. also on ebay, they go for cheap, but kinda hard to decipher at times if you are in fact getting one with the widescreen version as well