Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

Sony out of MGM's back catalog, 20th Century Fox in

DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

Sony out of MGM's back catalog, 20th Century Fox in

Old 05-30-06, 09:19 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,531
Sony out of MGM's back catalog, 20th Century Fox in

From Reuters:

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. on Tuesday unveiled new plans to revitalize the movie studio by ending video and DVD distribution pacts with Sony Pictures Entertainment and reestablishing a TV sales division.

MGM said it signed a new worldwide video and DVD distribution pact with 20th Century Fox to consolidate sales efforts under one company.Previously MGM split video and DVD distribution between Fox overseas and Sony in domestic arenas.

For Sony, MGM's decision cuts both ways. Sony's home video business will lose lucrative distribution fees it would have earned for releasing titles from MGM's library of 4,000 movies and 10,000 TV episodes. However, Sony will benefit if MGM makes more money because Sony owns 20 percent of the company.

Sony also secured a deal to extend a film co-production and distribution pact with MGM for one more James Bond film beyond November's release of "Casino Royale." Sony and MGM further agreed to co-produce and distribute a new "Pink Panther" comedy and other yet-to-be determined films.

Finally, MGM will continue supporting Sony's blu-ray DVD technology by releasing DVDs in the new video format.

"We have identified another important opportunity to build out our business by returning our worldwide television sales operations in-house and by consolidating our home entertainment releases with a single distributor," MGM chairman and CEO Harry Sloan said.

Sony has a seat on MGM's board, meaning it had a say in the decision.

The moves follow MGM's March announcement to again begin distributing movies to theaters on its own, and it comes about seven months after Sloan took the reins of the company.

Venerable MGM, known for producing movies like "The Wizard of Oz" and "Gone with the Wind" during Hollywood's Golden Age, was acquired last year by the Sony-led consortium for roughly $3 billion in cash, plus assumed debt.

Private equity investors Texas Pacific Group and Providence Equity Partners together own roughly 50 percent of MGM, Sony and cable TV company Comcast Corp. each own about 20 percent. Other major investors include DLJ Merchant Banking, Quadrangle Group and Sloan.

Sony Pictures is part of Japanese electronics company Sony Corp, and Fox is part of News Corp.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060531/...NlYwN5bmNhdA--
Adboy151 is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 10:00 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Posts: 6,364
Hmm, maybe I won't have to suffer with the Richard Burton/John Hurt version of 1984 being out of print for too much longer now...
Filmmaker is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 10:02 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Times Square
Posts: 12,133
Since Sony was rumored to be ignoring the catalog titles of MGM, this is potentially a great bit of news for movie lovers. Let's hope ....
marty888 is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 10:06 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
This is VERY interesting should Fox decide to support HD DVD one day.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 10:41 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Docking Bay 94
Posts: 14,259
Originally Posted by Adboy151
Venerable MGM, known for producing movies like "The Wizard of Oz" and "Gone with the Wind" during Hollywood's Golden Age, was acquired last year by the Sony-led consortium for roughly $3 billion in cash, plus assumed debt.
And I thought the WHOLE reason for spending the $3b was so Sony would have access to those 4000 movies and 10000 TV episodes for distribution. (At least, that's what all of the press indicated at the time.)

I'm confused. Why would Sony spend all of that $$$$ and then allow Fox to distribute the stuff? They've paid $3 billion for 20% of video profits and a James Bond film? And, is MGM still locked in as an exclusive Blu-ray distributor (as, I assume, Sony would want them)? Or is Fox allowed to call the shots and release MGM properties on HD-DVD, if they wish?

This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me... anyone have any insight?
bboisvert is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 10:46 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Fox isn't a part of HD DVD...yet. If they were, I would assume MGM would go along with them, hence my comment.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 10:48 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 2,456
Originally Posted by bboisvert
And I thought the WHOLE reason for spending the $3b was so Sony would have access to those 4000 movies and 10000 TV episodes for distribution. (At least, that's what all of the press indicated at the time.)

I'm confused. Why would Sony spend all of that $$$$ and then allow Fox to distribute the stuff? They've paid $3 billion for 20% of video profits and a James Bond film? And, is MGM still locked in as an exclusive Blu-ray distributor (as, I assume, Sony would want them)? Or is Fox allowed to call the shots and release MGM properties on HD-DVD, if they wish?

This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me... anyone have any insight?
I think Sony's big mistake was not outright buying MGM themselves instead of going into this consortium. They could have folded MGM/United Artists in with Columbia, Tristar, and Sony Pictures Classics and had total control.
NitroJMS is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 10:52 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Docking Bay 94
Posts: 14,259
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Fox isn't a part of HD DVD...yet. If they were, I would assume MGM would go along with them, hence my comment.
Right, I know that they aren't yet...

... I guess my question is why Sony got involved in this and spent so much $$$$ if MGM can essentially just walk away from them. Sony got into a huge bidding war w/Warner over the MGM catalog and paid out a ton of cash, paid off debts, etc... and then a year later, right as Sony is about to launch their new format, MGM walks away??? I guess I don't understand how this whole thing is structured. I assumed that Sony at the very least had a majority vote -- and therefore essentially had control of the company.
bboisvert is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 11:00 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Originally Posted by bboisvert
Right, I know that they aren't yet...

... I guess my question is why Sony got involved in this and spent so much $$$$ if MGM can essentially just walk away from them. Sony got into a huge bidding war w/Warner over the MGM catalog and paid out a ton of cash, paid off debts, etc... and then a year later, right as Sony is about to launch their new format, MGM walks away??? I guess I don't understand how this whole thing is structured. I assumed that Sony at the very least had a majority vote -- and therefore essentially had control of the company.
It's possible that since Sony knows WB is format-agnostic that they wanted to do anything they could to secure those rights away from WB until such a time that it might not matter any more. ? I'm completely speculating and that might not make sense.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 11:04 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 11,841
Originally Posted by bboisvert
And I thought the WHOLE reason for spending the $3b was so Sony would have access to those 4000 movies and 10000 TV episodes for distribution. (At least, that's what all of the press indicated at the time.)

I'm confused. Why would Sony spend all of that $$$$ and then allow Fox to distribute the stuff? They've paid $3 billion for 20% of video profits and a James Bond film? And, is MGM still locked in as an exclusive Blu-ray distributor (as, I assume, Sony would want them)? Or is Fox allowed to call the shots and release MGM properties on HD-DVD, if they wish?

This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me... anyone have any insight?
My understanding is MGM is up and running itself again, and Sony is a minority shareholder. Here's a breakdown of who spent what in the MGM-Sony deal. In short, sounds like Sony's screwed up.

Providence Equity Partners - $525 million
Texas Pacific Group - $350 million.
Sony and Comcast Corp - $300 million each.
DLJ Merchant Banking Partners - $125 million
JP Morgan Chase - leading a bank syndicate to provide as much as $4.25 billion more in senior debt financing together with Credit Suisse First Boston.

Last edited by DthRdrX; 05-30-06 at 11:23 PM.
DthRdrX is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 11:23 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Macon, Georgia
Posts: 267
One interesting thing to consider here is that 20th Century Fox has licensed titles to Criterion (Naked Lunch, Kagemusha, and Young Mr. Lincoln are a few examples). I wonder if this deal would allow them to license out MGM titles.
Detective Thorn is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 02:27 AM
  #12  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Truth or Consequences, NM
Posts: 1,216
OK Fox......




FROM BEYOND




please?
dablueguy is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 02:54 AM
  #13  
DVD Talk Legend
 
The Valeyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Posts: 10,553
This is great news. Let anyone other than Sony have control of MGMs catalog. Let's see some justice done to some of those titles.

Let the lion roar again.
The Valeyard is online now  
Old 05-31-06, 02:55 AM
  #14  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 67
Anyone know if will affect the Upcoming Bond DVD's?
DarkEye is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 03:28 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 531
I'm just off the blower to Hiratoa Komitsu at Sony Japan Inc. and he's confirmed they are very happy with the new deal because Sony Computer Entertainment has retained the PlayStation3 game transfer rights to the entire back catalogue of Golan-Globus's Cannon Films from 1990 onwards from MGM-JP Morgan. He said that the ground-breaking artistic quality of the back catalogue would be particularly suited to the PS3.

That's a good deal

Reservoir is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 05:19 AM
  #16  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,918
Whats in MGMs TV library that hasn't been on DVD?
dvd-4-life is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 07:30 AM
  #17  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Francisco. CA
Posts: 63
I am glad to hear that MGM is back in business. I thought they had been completely taken over by Sony. Long live Leo the Lion!
jimnysf is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 08:11 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Bacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: the 870
Posts: 21,190
Great News any time anyone other than Sony controls titles its a great thing !!
Bacon is online now  
Old 05-31-06, 09:57 AM
  #19  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Docking Bay 94
Posts: 14,259
So, I assume that means that the previously-announced (then postponed/cancelled) Mad Max Superbit will now never happen.
bboisvert is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 10:28 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 425
Please get the MIDNIGHT MOVIES series back up and running...
FILMCZY is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 11:11 AM
  #21  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
BSTNFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NW of Boston
Posts: 1,207
Originally Posted by FILMCZY
Please get the MIDNIGHT MOVIES series back up and running...
EXACTLY! That was my immediate reaction.
BSTNFAN is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 01:09 PM
  #22  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 96
"Please get the MIDNIGHT MOVIES series back up and running..."

I THIRD THE MOTION!!!
Daniel McKenzey is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 01:17 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 1,747
I'm very, very confused. But if this means the missing Leone movies will finally get R1 releases, then I'm OK with that.
MEJHarrison is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 04:07 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Trencher's Farm
Posts: 1,989
I don't care who does it as long as they come out and they're properly done.
mike7162 is offline  
Old 05-31-06, 04:55 PM
  #25  
Cool New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 26
Originally posted by Detective Thorn
One interesting thing to consider here is that 20th Century Fox has licensed titles to Criterion (Naked Lunch, Kagemusha, and Young Mr. Lincoln are a few examples). I wonder if this deal would allow them to license out MGM titles.
It appears that way. Here's a quote from the Hollywood Reporter:
"When the MGM board, which includes Sony representation, met Tuesday to consider the issue, Fox was touted as a better alternative because it has invested heavily in third-party distribution, making it a potentially more favorable purveyor of MGM fare."

You can read the entire article here.
eddiemunster is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.