![]() |
I can't imagine Criterion mucking up their covers like that.
Maybe that "C" and the logo on the side are just stickers on the shrink-wrap, or some sort of paper overlay under the shrink-wrap? |
I really don't care either way....they can do what they want. It won't make me buy more or less.....nor will I enjoy the film more or less. I've never really cared about coverart and it will never make me not buy something. They can ship ANY dvd to me in a fucking paper bag and as long as it's undamaged.....I'll be just fine. I've made my own inserts for years....why not coverart if I need it?
|
Well, after giving it time to grow on me, I still do not like it. I probably will not buy anymore Criterion titles.
...after I pick up the new Seven Samurai. Unless they release more Hitchcock. Or Renoir. Or Bergman. A Criterion of Syriana would be nice. I would break down for Lang. And maybe de Sica. ...or any other great movie with a quality transfer and informative supplaments. So I guess I will continue to be Criterion, but every time I do I will take a moment to think "that is an ugly, stupid C." |
It kinda sucks that Seven Samurai, Yojimbo and Sanjuro are gonna be re-released with that new crappy logo. I think I'll hold onto my old cover art.
|
Originally Posted by Shagrath
Someone over at criterionforum.org posted an example of what the Rohmer box would have looked like if Criterion had kept the old banner, and I think it looks a lot better. Everything just seems to blow better. The new "C" and tab look like they were just added in as an afterthought without actually integrating them into the color scheme of the cover.
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6460/rohmer0dl.jpg The tilted, haphazard C just makes it look sloppy. |
Originally Posted by basaro
It's not like the old/new numbers will be mixed up, so they won't be intertwined.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.