Apocalypse Now: The Complete Dossier, Bram Stoker’s Dracula and More HD Coppola
#154
DVD Talk Legend
I wonder if the reason they split it up was to stop people from keeping one version of the film and selling or giving away the other (which would be a potential lost sale).
I still think that Hearts of Darkness is too "big" to be an extra feature in an AN set. It played theatrically. It will get its own release, if it ever gets released, that is.
I still think that Hearts of Darkness is too "big" to be an extra feature in an AN set. It played theatrically. It will get its own release, if it ever gets released, that is.
#155
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drexl
I wonder if the reason they split it up was to stop people from keeping one version of the film and selling or giving away the other (which would be a potential lost sale).
I still think that Hearts of Darkness is too "big" to be an extra feature in an AN set. It played theatrically. It will get its own release, if it ever gets released, that is.
I still think that Hearts of Darkness is too "big" to be an extra feature in an AN set. It played theatrically. It will get its own release, if it ever gets released, that is.
Still unbelievable that they would do such a thing.
#156
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But no mention whether the theatrical cut on this edition is better A/V wise compared to the original release. Any definitive answers out there yet ?
#157
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While I agree that splitting the original 1979 theatrical version across two 2 DVD's is stupid, isn't splitting Redux in half the right thing to do, given that it's 3 hours and 22 minutes long? It seems like the smart thing to do would have to been make it 3 discs, with Disc 1 being the original, Disc 2 and 3 being Redux, and then have the extras spread out among all three discs.
#158
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Compton (Straight Outta)
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Exactly. Correct the problem yourself.
Paramount really fucked this one up.
Paramount really fucked this one up.
#159
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sb5
While I agree that splitting the original 1979 theatrical version across two 2 DVD's is stupid, isn't splitting Redux in half the right thing to do, given that it's 3 hours and 22 minutes long? It seems like the smart thing to do would have to been make it 3 discs, with Disc 1 being the original, Disc 2 and 3 being Redux, and then have the extras spread out among all three discs.
By splitting up Redux, depending on how much is on each disc, they might buy more space for extras.
Three discs is what they should have done. The current two-disc layout, IMO, will somewhat affect enjoyment of the original cut. Redux could use a bathroom break though. I almost, but not quite, made it to the end while watching the current DVD.
I have this on pre-order right now, but every now and then I consider cancelling it. The extras are tempting me a bit, but I have the original releases with the films all on one disc, and that might be enough for now. I'm not parting with them even if I get the new set.
#160
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Superdaddy
This would have been a good solution.
By splitting up Redux, depending on how much is on each disc, they might buy more space for extras.
Three discs is what they should have done. The current two-disc layout, IMO, will somewhat affect enjoyment of the original cut. Redux could use a bathroom break though. I almost, but not quite, made it to the end while watching the current DVD.
I have this on pre-order right now, but every now and then I consider cancelling it. The extras are tempting me a bit, but I have the original releases with the films all on one disc, and that might be enough for now. I'm not parting with them even if I get the new set.
By splitting up Redux, depending on how much is on each disc, they might buy more space for extras.
Three discs is what they should have done. The current two-disc layout, IMO, will somewhat affect enjoyment of the original cut. Redux could use a bathroom break though. I almost, but not quite, made it to the end while watching the current DVD.
I have this on pre-order right now, but every now and then I consider cancelling it. The extras are tempting me a bit, but I have the original releases with the films all on one disc, and that might be enough for now. I'm not parting with them even if I get the new set.
I say cancel it. Send them the message.
#162
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by emhello
I say cancel it. Send them the message.
#164
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Average
Zoetrope handles their own DVD authoring. I'm pretty sure you should take it up with them.
But for those that do, have at it.
#165
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: WA State
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
from the bargains section, here's what circuit city is offering:
Apocalypse Now: The Complete Dossier >>>> $12.99 ****
****Circuit City Exclusive: Free 20 minute bonus DVD // Includes added & expanded scenes from Apocalypse Now: Redux, the destruction of the Kurtz compound with Coppola commentary & trailers
****Circuit City Exclusive: Free 20 minute bonus DVD // Includes added & expanded scenes from Apocalypse Now: Redux, the destruction of the Kurtz compound with Coppola commentary & trailers
#166
DVD Talk Hero
Let me get this straight...
They're still cropping the image.
Both versions are unnecessarily split between two discs.
I'm surprised FFC didn't get ILM to stick Jar-Jar Binks into half of the scenes.
Christ, how many different ways can they fuck this release up?
They're still cropping the image.
Both versions are unnecessarily split between two discs.
I'm surprised FFC didn't get ILM to stick Jar-Jar Binks into half of the scenes.
Christ, how many different ways can they fuck this release up?
#168
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm floored that the missing material from the first two DVDs is only being offered through Circuit City ... that's unbelievably aggravating. I'm curious as to whether Paramount's gotten wind yet of the fury this edition's generated ...
#169
I considered selling my original theatrical cut of the film but I knew they would somehow screw this release up. I'm considering not buying this new release at all, maybe they'll get this one right with an HD release in the future.
#170
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
Christ, how many different ways can they fuck this release up?
I sold my copy of Redux last month in anticipation of this release. Once I read about the specs of this abortion, I canceled my pre-order and ordered a copy of the original for $5 from half.com.
#172
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I considered trading/selling my original cut DVD when I first heard about this release, but surely glad I didn't. Feels good to pass on a sucka's release like this one.
While I'd love to (finally) see this film on home video in its OAR, and hear that amazing soundscape reproduced in a full bitrate DTS track, it appears that such will have to await the next generation of home video media.
BTW, remember when Coppolla/Zoetrope were calling the original cut "permanently retired" back when Redux hit the theaters? Heh. Well, as Jim Morrison might say "goodie for us that we know they are a liar." Goodie for them, too. Hopefully, if this podperson who's been calling himself "Coppolla" since the early-80s should decide to take a scissors to "I" or "II", it won't be to the negative.
While I'd love to (finally) see this film on home video in its OAR, and hear that amazing soundscape reproduced in a full bitrate DTS track, it appears that such will have to await the next generation of home video media.
BTW, remember when Coppolla/Zoetrope were calling the original cut "permanently retired" back when Redux hit the theaters? Heh. Well, as Jim Morrison might say "goodie for us that we know they are a liar." Goodie for them, too. Hopefully, if this podperson who's been calling himself "Coppolla" since the early-80s should decide to take a scissors to "I" or "II", it won't be to the negative.
#173
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Korova Milkbar
Posts: 5,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Add me to the list of those taking a pass on this release... AN is one of my top 5 films of all time but this release is a joke. No thanks, I'll keep my original and Redux copies...
#174
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I resisted buying any previous versions, but I waited long enough and decided that the cut-price was good enough to get it now.
Coppola does describe the Hearts Of Darkness doc, on the intro video before the film plays, as "Excellent", which dimisses the theory that he doesn't like it because it portrays him as a madman.
Apologies for the dreadful quality of the picture, but I've misplaced my camera and I had to use my phone.
Coppola does describe the Hearts Of Darkness doc, on the intro video before the film plays, as "Excellent", which dimisses the theory that he doesn't like it because it portrays him as a madman.
Apologies for the dreadful quality of the picture, but I've misplaced my camera and I had to use my phone.